MSI 1070 Sea hawk vs MSI 1070 Armour OC - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HotUKDeals, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HotUKDeals app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

MSI 1070 Sea hawk vs MSI 1070 Armour OC

£0.00 @ MSI
Which do you think is the best card. The Sea hawk is cheaper by £10 and is liquid cooled but uses a reference board, is it better to buy the Armour due to this ? Read More
kester76 Avatar
3m, 1w agoPosted 3 months, 1 week ago
Which do you think is the best card. The Sea hawk is cheaper by £10 and is liquid cooled but uses a reference board, is it better to buy the Armour due to this ?
Other Links From MSI:
kester76 Avatar
3m, 1w agoPosted 3 months, 1 week ago
Options

All Responses

(12) Jump to unreadPost an answer
Responses/page:
#1
In terms of cooling performance, the sea hawk would most likely be better. The cons of the sea hawk is that it requires that your case to support a 120mm rad+fan, it is still limited by voltage/power due to an unmodified bios and you need a spare fan header to power the 120mm fan as well.
The reference board is already decent enough for Pascal.
#3
For a 1070 it wouldn't make too much difference in performance. The Sea Hawk should give you better thermals and less fan noise as it's water cooled. Both cards should boost to 2000Mhz even though the MSI Armour has more power phases and an additional 6 pin power (as well as the standard 8 Pin on the 1070) it won't affect performance or overclocking as the Nvidia limits how much power can go through the card so the extra 6 pin doesn't make much difference. If you have the space in your case go for the Sea Hawk, less noise and better thermals with the same performance.
#4
Suztera
In terms of cooling performance, the sea hawk would most likely be better. The cons of the sea hawk is that it requires that your case to support a 120mm rad+fan, it is still limited by voltage/power due to an unmodified bios and you need a spare fan header to power the 120mm fan as well.
The reference board is already decent enough for Pascal.
I've got plenty of space in my case to house the cooler and fan connection wise it isn't an issue. A little weird not having the GPU control the Fan speed though but I guess a lot of AIO are like this. Do you think it being a ref board is a minus against the armour with better components and layout ?
#5
kester76
Suztera
In terms of cooling performance, the sea hawk would most likely be better. The cons of the sea hawk is that it requires that your case to support a 120mm rad+fan, it is still limited by voltage/power due to an unmodified bios and you need a spare fan header to power the 120mm fan as well.
The reference board is already decent enough for Pascal.
I've got plenty of space in my case to house the cooler and fan connection wise it isn't an issue. A little weird not having the GPU control the Fan speed though but I guess a lot of AIO are like this. Do you think it being a ref board is a minus against the armour with better components and layout ?
It's because it's reusing its existing AIO cooler rather redesigning it completely. Most of the high-end water-cooled cards will have a connector to connect the fan and can be controlled by the card itself.
Whether you get a card that overclocks well depends on your luck due to silicon lottery.
With sufficient cooling, the reference board is perfectly fine.
#6
randomvector
For a 1070 it wouldn't make too much difference in performance. The Sea Hawk should give you better thermals and less fan noise as it's water cooled. Both cards should boost to 2000Mhz even though the MSI Armour has more power phases and an additional 6 pin power (as well as the standard 8 Pin on the 1070) it won't affect performance or overclocking as the Nvidia limits how much power can go through the card so the extra 6 pin doesn't make much difference. If you have the space in your case go for the Sea Hawk, less noise and better thermals with the same performance.
Thanks, I'll look a bit futher into this. Do you think there will be any other price drops on these cards ?
#7
Suztera
kester76
Suztera
In terms of cooling performance, the sea hawk would most likely be better. The cons of the sea hawk is that it requires that your case to support a 120mm rad+fan, it is still limited by voltage/power due to an unmodified bios and you need a spare fan header to power the 120mm fan as well.
The reference board is already decent enough for Pascal.
I've got plenty of space in my case to house the cooler and fan connection wise it isn't an issue. A little weird not having the GPU control the Fan speed though but I guess a lot of AIO are like this. Do you think it being a ref board is a minus against the armour with better components and layout ?
It's because it's reusing its existing AIO cooler rather redesigning it completely. Most of the high-end water-cooled cards will have a connector to connect the fan and can be controlled by the card itself.
Whether you get a card that overclocks well depends on your luck due to silicon lottery.
With sufficient cooling, the reference board is perfectly fine.
I probably be using the default clock OC speeds on the unit but after putting up with my ref r9 290 I'd like something a little quieter during the summer months.
I think I'll sleep on this before pulling the trigger on a £380 GPU, not sure if the 1070s are going to drop a little more after the 18th.
#8
kester76
randomvector
For a 1070 it wouldn't make too much difference in performance. The Sea Hawk should give you better thermals and less fan noise as it's water cooled. Both cards should boost to 2000Mhz even though the MSI Armour has more power phases and an additional 6 pin power (as well as the standard 8 Pin on the 1070) it won't affect performance or overclocking as the Nvidia limits how much power can go through the card so the extra 6 pin doesn't make much difference. If you have the space in your case go for the Sea Hawk, less noise and better thermals with the same performance.
Thanks, I'll look a bit futher into this. Do you think there will be any other price drops on these cards ?
RIght now, most likely no. Perhaps when there is a new release of gpus, it may drop.
#9
Suztera
kester76
randomvector
For a 1070 it wouldn't make too much difference in performance. The Sea Hawk should give you better thermals and less fan noise as it's water cooled. Both cards should boost to 2000Mhz even though the MSI Armour has more power phases and an additional 6 pin power (as well as the standard 8 Pin on the 1070) it won't affect performance or overclocking as the Nvidia limits how much power can go through the card so the extra 6 pin doesn't make much difference. If you have the space in your case go for the Sea Hawk, less noise and better thermals with the same performance.
Thanks, I'll look a bit futher into this. Do you think there will be any other price drops on these cards ?
RIght now, most likely no. Perhaps when there is a new release of gpus, it may drop.
Wasn't sure if the RX 580 would cause the 1060 to drop and have a knock on effect with the other cards. Also are card manufacturers switching GDDR5 to GDDR5x on the lower tier models ?
http://www.pcgamer.com/asus-announces-geforce-gtx-1080-and-1060-cards-with-faster-ram/
#10
Thanks everyone I'm going to get some sleep and think about it.
#11
You think in your sleep? :p
#12
Wouldn't you be better of getting a 1080 for this price , I mean they don't run that hot or loudly anyway

Post an Answer

You don't need an account to leave a response. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!