Duke Nuke'Em Forever Balls Of Steel Edition £59 ! @ Blockbusters - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit
Very cheap for the Balls Edition !
Deal Tags:
More From Blockbuster [In Administration]:
×
Get the Hottest Deals Daily
Stay informed. Once a day, we'll send you the deals our members voted as the best.
Failed
PS3Deals Avatar
5y, 7m agoFound 5 years, 7 months ago
Options

All Comments

(24) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#1
Gonna wait for this drop abit more! Gotma feelin this will be in the bargain bin very soon!
3 Likes #2
worst game of the year
3 Likes #3
defard
worst game of the year

Worst Game in 14 Years ;)
2 Likes #4
£59.................. biggest waste of money ever
3 Likes #5
After playing it this morning i would say that all the versions of DNF are balls editions!

Rent it if you must but please don't buy it.
1 Like #6
solonely
defard
worst game of the year

Worst Game in 14 Years ;)


lol, 14 years ago it might have been ok, but by today's standards it really is such a crap game, i wouldn't even recommend pirating it, let alone even renting it.
3 Likes #7
I can tell some people aren't fans, or even aware, of His Majesty, because I keep seeing this 'Nuke'Em' thing cropping up. Hehe.
#8
I've got balls of steeeeel.
1 Like #9
I enjoyed it.

If you havent played it then give it a go. Dont base your opinion on reviews.

Online is pretty mental, but it is exactly what i expected from duke./
#10
Just wait until this plummets in price as I can't see this being too 'limited'
#11
http://www.airbornegamer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Duke-Nukem-funny-fan-art5.jpg
#12
HEAT ADDED! £79.99 @ Game in store
1 Like #13
Near enough normal price for the balls of steel edition.

Also, its an awesome game, but too many sheep follow a few poor reviews and judge it without playing it. Fair enough, the Xbox 360 version is garbage, but the PS3 and PC ones still play well. Far too many idiots these days focus on the graphics and not the gameplay, one of the many reasons why this generation of games is by far the worst yet.

If this was released 4-5 years earlier, people would be saying its a revelation to the FPS genre (even though technically it was a PC only game till Gearbox picked it up).

The game itself is better than anything in the awful CoD series, and quite a way ahead of other FPS games, but still generic, as all FPS games these days are.

Its laughable how IGN slate it for bringing nothing new to FPS games, and having bad graphics, when CoD has been doing the same thing for the last 4 years, spewing out the same garbage year after year, and still uses what is effectively a 5 year old graphics engine.
#14
striker33
Near enough normal price for the balls of steel edition.

Also, its an awesome game, but too many sheep follow a few poor reviews and judge it without playing it. Fair enough, the Xbox 360 version is garbage, but the PS3 and PC ones still play well. Far too many idiots these days focus on the graphics and not the gameplay, one of the many reasons why this generation of games is by far the worst yet.

If this was released 4-5 years earlier, people would be saying its a revelation to the FPS genre (even though technically it was a PC only game till Gearbox picked it up).

The game itself is better than anything in the awful CoD series, and quite a way ahead of other FPS games, but still generic, as all FPS games these days are.

Its laughable how IGN slate it for bringing nothing new to FPS games, and having bad graphics, when CoD has been doing the same thing for the last 4 years, spewing out the same garbage year after year, and still uses what is effectively a 5 year old graphics engine.



what a load of shiv, this game is awful. end of!!!
#15
lukekey
striker33
Near enough normal price for the balls of steel edition.

Also, its an awesome game, but too many sheep follow a few poor reviews and judge it without playing it. Fair enough, the Xbox 360 version is garbage, but the PS3 and PC ones still play well. Far too many idiots these days focus on the graphics and not the gameplay, one of the many reasons why this generation of games is by far the worst yet.

If this was released 4-5 years earlier, people would be saying its a revelation to the FPS genre (even though technically it was a PC only game till Gearbox picked it up).

The game itself is better than anything in the awful CoD series, and quite a way ahead of other FPS games, but still generic, as all FPS games these days are.

Its laughable how IGN slate it for bringing nothing new to FPS games, and having bad graphics, when CoD has been doing the same thing for the last 4 years, spewing out the same garbage year after year, and still uses what is effectively a 5 year old graphics engine.



what a load of shiv, this game is awful. end of!!!


Ah, such a hugely detailed and well written post, I salute you good sir.
#16
striker33
lukekey
striker33
Near enough normal price for the balls of steel edition.

Also, its an awesome game, but too many sheep follow a few poor reviews and judge it without playing it. Fair enough, the Xbox 360 version is garbage, but the PS3 and PC ones still play well. Far too many idiots these days focus on the graphics and not the gameplay, one of the many reasons why this generation of games is by far the worst yet.

If this was released 4-5 years earlier, people would be saying its a revelation to the FPS genre (even though technically it was a PC only game till Gearbox picked it up).

The game itself is better than anything in the awful CoD series, and quite a way ahead of other FPS games, but still generic, as all FPS games these days are.

Its laughable how IGN slate it for bringing nothing new to FPS games, and having bad graphics, when CoD has been doing the same thing for the last 4 years, spewing out the same garbage year after year, and still uses what is effectively a 5 year old graphics engine.



what a load of shiv, this game is awful. end of!!!


Ah, such a hugely detailed and well written post, I salute you good sir.



thank you.short and to the point i think.nothing else really needs to be said, as most people that have played this game will agree.
#17
lukekey
striker33
lukekey
striker33
Near enough normal price for the balls of steel edition.

Also, its an awesome game, but too many sheep follow a few poor reviews and judge it without playing it. Fair enough, the Xbox 360 version is garbage, but the PS3 and PC ones still play well. Far too many idiots these days focus on the graphics and not the gameplay, one of the many reasons why this generation of games is by far the worst yet.

If this was released 4-5 years earlier, people would be saying its a revelation to the FPS genre (even though technically it was a PC only game till Gearbox picked it up).

The game itself is better than anything in the awful CoD series, and quite a way ahead of other FPS games, but still generic, as all FPS games these days are.

Its laughable how IGN slate it for bringing nothing new to FPS games, and having bad graphics, when CoD has been doing the same thing for the last 4 years, spewing out the same garbage year after year, and still uses what is effectively a 5 year old graphics engine.



what a load of shiv, this game is awful. end of!!!


Ah, such a hugely detailed and well written post, I salute you good sir.



thank you.short and to the point i think.nothing else really needs to be said, as most people that have played this game will agree.


And as with most people who've played the game who post 1 line comments saying the game sucks are either too stubborn to play it because it doesnt have graphics at the level of Crysis or are simply too brainwashed by today's generic garbage for the masses.
#18
defard
worst game of the year


I take it you've not tried Brink yet? :p

Edited By: Vladimir on Jun 13, 2011 01:32
#19
striker33
lukekey
striker33
lukekey
striker33
Near enough normal price for the balls of steel edition.

Also, its an awesome game, but too many sheep follow a few poor reviews and judge it without playing it. Fair enough, the Xbox 360 version is garbage, but the PS3 and PC ones still play well. Far too many idiots these days focus on the graphics and not the gameplay, one of the many reasons why this generation of games is by far the worst yet.

If this was released 4-5 years earlier, people would be saying its a revelation to the FPS genre (even though technically it was a PC only game till Gearbox picked it up).

The game itself is better than anything in the awful CoD series, and quite a way ahead of other FPS games, but still generic, as all FPS games these days are.

Its laughable how IGN slate it for bringing nothing new to FPS games, and having bad graphics, when CoD has been doing the same thing for the last 4 years, spewing out the same garbage year after year, and still uses what is effectively a 5 year old graphics engine.



what a load of shiv, this game is awful. end of!!!


Ah, such a hugely detailed and well written post, I salute you good sir.



thank you.short and to the point i think.nothing else really needs to be said, as most people that have played this game will agree.


And as with most people who've played the game who post 1 line comments saying the game sucks are either too stubborn to play it because it doesnt have graphics at the level of Crysis or are simply too brainwashed by today's generic garbage for the masses.

Nobody cares.
#20
striker33
Near enough normal price for the balls of steel edition.

Also, its an awesome game, but too many sheep follow a few poor reviews and judge it without playing it. Fair enough, the Xbox 360 version is garbage, but the PS3 and PC ones still play well. Far too many idiots these days focus on the graphics and not the gameplay, one of the many reasons why this generation of games is by far the worst yet.

If this was released 4-5 years earlier, people would be saying its a revelation to the FPS genre (even though technically it was a PC only game till Gearbox picked it up).

The game itself is better than anything in the awful CoD series, and quite a way ahead of other FPS games, but still generic, as all FPS games these days are.

Its laughable how IGN slate it for bringing nothing new to FPS games, and having bad graphics, when CoD has been doing the same thing for the last 4 years, spewing out the same garbage year after year, and still uses what is effectively a 5 year old graphics engine.

That's hilarious!

Edited By: Dantooine on Jun 13, 2011 09:00
#21
striker33
lukekey
striker33
lukekey
striker33
Near enough normal price for the balls of steel edition.

Also, its an awesome game, but too many sheep follow a few poor reviews and judge it without playing it. Fair enough, the Xbox 360 version is garbage, but the PS3 and PC ones still play well. Far too many idiots these days focus on the graphics and not the gameplay, one of the many reasons why this generation of games is by far the worst yet.

If this was released 4-5 years earlier, people would be saying its a revelation to the FPS genre (even though technically it was a PC only game till Gearbox picked it up).

The game itself is better than anything in the awful CoD series, and quite a way ahead of other FPS games, but still generic, as all FPS games these days are.

Its laughable how IGN slate it for bringing nothing new to FPS games, and having bad graphics, when CoD has been doing the same thing for the last 4 years, spewing out the same garbage year after year, and still uses what is effectively a 5 year old graphics engine.


what a load of shiv, this game is awful. end of!!!

Ah, such a hugely detailed and well written post, I salute you good sir.


thank you.short and to the point i think.nothing else really needs to be said, as most people that have played this game will agree.

And as with most people who've played the game who post 1 line comments saying the game sucks are either too stubborn to play it because it doesnt have graphics at the level of Crysis or are simply too brainwashed by today's generic garbage for the masses.


Dear lord!
to do that kind of comparison immediately remove the credible from the contradictorial stance you have

Way too many companies do not allow real reviews we all know that if they did we would slate the bizzniss out of them.
Ea is such a great company all their games have no glitches and yet always deserve the great reviews they seem to get
Kinda like how apple products are the best in the world

i must ask though why do we never hear bad things about big name companies games/product until after we buy it ????

Cod black ops = lol +1
but yet not one mention of that in any review anywhere why do you think that is ?????
#22
With the pile of cowdung this game turned out to be, this will go down in price like a lead balloon soon.
#23
Lead balloons' prices drop THAT quickly?:p
#24
ballons of lead edition?

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Top of Page
Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!