Joie Trillo Shield Group 1/2/3 Car Seat (5.5% Quidco) - £50.00 @ Uberkids - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HotUKDeals, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HotUKDeals app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit
204

Joie Trillo Shield Group 1/2/3 Car Seat (5.5% Quidco) - £50.00 @ Uberkids

£50.00 @ Uber Kids
+ 5.5% Quidco Just bought this as an occasional car seat for my son, it's by far the best price for this seat and perfect for grandma's car. EDIT: + Free Side Window Sunshade x2 Read More
madasacatter Avatar
6m, 1w agoFound 6 months, 1 week ago
+ 5.5% Quidco

Just bought this as an occasional car seat for my son, it's by far the best price for this seat and perfect for grandma's car.

EDIT: + Free Side Window Sunshade x2
madasacatter Avatar
6m, 1w agoFound 6 months, 1 week ago
Options

All Comments

(22) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#1
Did really well in the crash tests too.
1 Like #2
Cold - front facing group 1 seats are not as safe as rear facing and should be banned. There is no excuse for putting a child at increased risk of death or serious injury for the sake of saving some money.
3 Likes #3
nitro228
Cold - front facing group 1 seats are not as safe as rear facing and should be banned. There is no excuse for putting a child at increased risk of death or serious injury for the sake of saving some money.


rear facing isn't always possible and impact shield seats are believed to be the next best option.
#4
They state this will be dispatched in Feb
#5
good price, just a shame they're not despatched immediately
1 Like #6
nitro228
Cold - front facing group 1 seats are not as safe as rear facing and should be banned. There is no excuse for putting a child at increased risk of death or serious injury for the sake of saving some money.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9YwK9fbS-wo/Vq5ATLquKBI/AAAAAAAAOHM/u4R5cpLlV9E/s1600/gonna-die.jpg
#7
This beats most rear facing seats in crash tests.
1 Like #8
vivski123
nitro228
Cold - front facing group 1 seats are not as safe as rear facing and should be banned. There is no excuse for putting a child at increased risk of death or serious injury for the sake of saving some money.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9YwK9fbS-wo/Vq5ATLquKBI/AAAAAAAAOHM/u4R5cpLlV9E/s1600/gonna-die.jpg


Yes, we all are going to die, but a child in a front facing seat who is unfortunate enough to be involved in a car accident is far more likely to die early, or end up paralysed than one in a rear facing seat. The evidence is overwhelming yet people seem happy to take the risk for the sake of saving a few quid.
#9
phillsmit3
This beats most rear facing seats in crash tests.


I doubt that very much. Most car seat tests only look at the distance a child moves in a crash and don't consider the forces that the child is subjected to. The important factor is the loading on the child's neck, which is huge in crashes at even moderate speeds. The only test that actually measures the loading on the child's neck is the Swedish plus test. This is the strictest car seat test in the world. Every seat that has passed the test is rear facing. If people are happy to take the risk with their child's life that is up to them, I just hope for the child's sake that they are never involved in a crash.
#10
nitro228
vivski123
nitro228
Cold - front facing group 1 seats are not as safe as rear facing and should be banned. There is no excuse for putting a child at increased risk of death or serious injury for the sake of saving some money.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9YwK9fbS-wo/Vq5ATLquKBI/AAAAAAAAOHM/u4R5cpLlV9E/s1600/gonna-die.jpg
Yes, we all are going to die, but a child in a front facing seat who is unfortunate enough to be involved in a car accident is far more likely to die early, or end up paralysed than one in a rear facing seat. The evidence is overwhelming yet people seem happy to take the risk for the sake of saving a few quid.

Car travel is safer than flying by aeroplane, fact, and you don't get a rear facing seat on a plane. Case and point.
#11
nitro228
vivski123
nitro228
Cold - front facing group 1 seats are not as safe as rear facing and should be banned. There is no excuse for putting a child at increased risk of death or serious injury for the sake of saving some money.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9YwK9fbS-wo/Vq5ATLquKBI/AAAAAAAAOHM/u4R5cpLlV9E/s1600/gonna-die.jpg

Yes, we all are going to die, but a child in a front facing seat who is unfortunate enough to be involved in a car accident is far more likely to die early, or end up paralysed than one in a rear facing seat. The evidence is overwhelming yet people seem happy to take the risk for the sake of saving a few quid.

And secondly, the world thinks it doesn't need saving, or educated. Maybe it doesn't. Especially not by the righteous. I do agree you're talking sense. But people are so stubborn, and life is a lottery. You take on a tough task :{
#12
vivski123
nitro228
vivski123
nitro228
Cold - front facing group 1 seats are not as safe as rear facing and should be banned. There is no excuse for putting a child at increased risk of death or serious injury for the sake of saving some money.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9YwK9fbS-wo/Vq5ATLquKBI/AAAAAAAAOHM/u4R5cpLlV9E/s1600/gonna-die.jpg
Yes, we all are going to die, but a child in a front facing seat who is unfortunate enough to be involved in a car accident is far more likely to die early, or end up paralysed than one in a rear facing seat. The evidence is overwhelming yet people seem happy to take the risk for the sake of saving a few quid.

Car travel is safer than flying by aeroplane, fact, and you don't get a rear facing seat on a plane. Case and point.


wrong... how many people die in car crashes each and every year compared to plane crashes??
besides, if a plane goes down the direction you're facing when it hits the ground won't make a damn bit of difference!
#13
laurieleigh
vivski123
nitro228
vivski123
nitro228
Cold - front facing group 1 seats are not as safe as rear facing and should be banned. There is no excuse for putting a child at increased risk of death or serious injury for the sake of saving some money.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9YwK9fbS-wo/Vq5ATLquKBI/AAAAAAAAOHM/u4R5cpLlV9E/s1600/gonna-die.jpg
Yes, we all are going to die, but a child in a front facing seat who is unfortunate enough to be involved in a car accident is far more likely to die early, or end up paralysed than one in a rear facing seat. The evidence is overwhelming yet people seem happy to take the risk for the sake of saving a few quid.
Car travel is safer than flying by aeroplane, fact, and you don't get a rear facing seat on a plane. Case and point.
wrong... how many people die in car crashes each and every year compared to plane crashes??
besides, if a plane goes down the direction you're facing when it hits the ground won't make a damn bit of difference!

My point exactly! And I'm pretty sure aeroplanes hold more people than cars do. Simple maths. Think about it.
#14
but how many planes crash each year? versus the number of fatalities from car crashes? you're probably looking at 300-400 people dying in plane crashes each year compared to a similar number each day in cars.
#15
laurieleigh
but how many planes crash each year? versus the number of fatalities from car crashes? you're probably looking at 300-400 people dying in plane crashes each year compared to a similar number each day in cars.

No, you're wrong.
#16
Link doesn't work.
#17
vivski123
laurieleigh
but how many planes crash each year? versus the number of fatalities from car crashes? you're probably looking at 300-400 people dying in plane crashes each year compared to a similar number each day in cars.

No, you're wrong.


ok
#18
laurieleigh
vivski123
laurieleigh
but how many planes crash each year? versus the number of fatalities from car crashes? you're probably looking at 300-400 people dying in plane crashes each year compared to a similar number each day in cars.
No, you're wrong.
ok

It took a while but we got there. :)
1 Like #19
vivski123
nitro228
vivski123
nitro228
Cold - front facing group 1 seats are not as safe as rear facing and should be banned. There is no excuse for putting a child at increased risk of death or serious injury for the sake of saving some money.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9YwK9fbS-wo/Vq5ATLquKBI/AAAAAAAAOHM/u4R5cpLlV9E/s1600/gonna-die.jpg
Yes, we all are going to die, but a child in a front facing seat who is unfortunate enough to be involved in a car accident is far more likely to die early, or end up paralysed than one in a rear facing seat. The evidence is overwhelming yet people seem happy to take the risk for the sake of saving a few quid.

Car travel is safer than flying by aeroplane, fact, and you don't get a rear facing seat on a plane. Case and point.


Car travel is not safer than flying - very far from it. Saying fact after a ludicrous statement does not make it true. Mile for mile plant travel is by far the safest form of transport. Car travel is statistically one of the most dangerous. The direction of seats in planes is largely irrelevant in this argument as plane crashes typically involve speeds of 300mph+
You are however much more likely to survive a train crash if you are rear facing.
I don't really care what decisions people make with regard to their own children's safety but I think people should be aware of the facts. Unfortunately most people are totally ignorant of the fact that rear facing is safer and therefore can't make an informed decision.

Edited By: nitro228 on Dec 29, 2016 07:43: .
#20
Lol, top notch trolling, well done!
#21
Was gonna say the same about trolling lol. Whilst I know erf is safer it has not been possible for us (& yes I care about my children's safety)partly to do with cost..... I care about their safety but I also like to feed and clothe them and the manufacturers of these seats are really cashing in, I am thankful to people posting deals on the safer forward facing seats too...far to many people making judgements on peoples parenting just on what type of carseat they have. Parents make risk assessments all the time so informed choice is important. Rant over ... And heat added
#22
offer no longer available :(

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Top of Page
Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!