lg eg910 v 55 oled tv £1199 Selfridges - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit
266

lg eg910 v 55 oled tv £1,199.00 Selfridges

£1199.00 @ Selfridges
Best price for this model from a reputable seller. 5 year warranty
AAAli Avatar
6m, 2w agoFound 6 months, 2 weeks ago
Best price for this model from a reputable seller. 5 year warranty
Deal Tags:
More From Selfridges:
AAAli Avatar
6m, 2w agoFound 6 months, 2 weeks ago
Options

All Comments

(31) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
4 Likes #1
No HDR?!

One for the toilet or guest room only, methinks.

Edited By: HedgyHoggy on Aug 09, 2016 21:06
2 Likes #2
Sure pal - buy a HDR 4K 55 hisense for 679
1 Like #3
Hisense or no-sense
Compared to a lg oled !
#4
Typical, we bought this model a week ago elsewhere for £100 more :(
#5
AAAli
Sure pal - buy a HDR 4K 55 hisense for 679

HDR means nothing on a HiSense TV. Non standardised and thus not ratified.

Edited By: fishmaster on Aug 09, 2016 23:32
1 Like #6
fishmaster
AAAli
Sure pal - buy a HDR 4K 55 hisense for 679

HDR means nothing on a HiSense TV. Non standardised and thus not ratified.


Lol that was my point to hedgy. Some people get lost in tech talk with out understanding it. HD makes up the significant chuck of current transmission, the TV above is one of the best for it.
#7
posted a few days ago
#8
HedgyHoggy
No HDR?!

One for the toilet or guest room only, methinks.


​you stick to Samsung with its HDR, and all the other rubbish.

lol. HDR hype is invented by Samsung as they can't compete with the quality of OLED..
#9
Shock
HDR hype is invented by Samsung as they can't compete with the quality of OLED..

There are OLED HDR TVs. The quality can be amazing, stunning even (and unlike estate agents, I don't use the term lightly).
#10
I didn't say there aren't HDR OLED, it's just not as heavily promoted or needed on an OLED..
1 Like #11
This TV is stunning (yes I would say that wouldn't I). I have one and paid £200 more than this price. Worth it. Great find OP.
#12
Shock
I didn't say there aren't HDR OLED, it's just not as heavily promoted or needed on an OLED..


I'd say hdr is much better suited to an oled, much darker blacks and hdr gives you the much needed detail.

even tho the hdr content isn't there yet, I would be future proofing in spending that bit more, this isn't exactly a cheap TV that you would want to replace soon.
#13
This is not an HDR model OLED
#14
houston26
Shock
I didn't say there aren't HDR OLED, it's just not as heavily promoted or needed on an OLED..
I'd say hdr is much better suited to an oled, much darker blacks and hdr gives you the much needed detail.
even tho the hdr content isn't there yet, I would be future proofing in spending that bit more, this isn't exactly a cheap TV that you would want to replace soon.

I'd be a bit careful in future proofing just yet. There's two competing HDR formats at the moment and devices like the Xbox One S only support one of them (in the XboxOne S case its HDR-10)
#15
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.

Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
#16
daxx2009
This is not an HDR model OLED
We already know that.
1 Like #17
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)

Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.
#18
afroylnt
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.

I'd laugh more that those people buying TVs without 4K. You don't pay a premium for 4K anymore.
Besides, there are plenty of 4K sources coming online. Most stuff in 4K is amazing. So stop laughing and go grab a Kleenex to wipe your tears. (_;)
2 Likes #19
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.
I'd laugh more that those people buying TVs without 4K. You don't pay a premium for 4K anymore.
Besides, there are plenty of 4K sources coming online. Most stuff in 4K is amazing. So stop laughing and go grab a Kleenex to wipe your tears. (_;)
So where can I get 4k for free? good for you believing all the marketing hype and paying extra for 4k sources; well done - at least you are helping the economy..
remember poor picture = poor picture even if its 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k, 128k etc

Edited By: afroylnt on Aug 10, 2016 15:10
#20
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.
I'd laugh more that those people buying TVs without 4K. You don't pay a premium for 4K anymore.
Besides, there are plenty of 4K sources coming online. Most stuff in 4K is amazing. So stop laughing and go grab a Kleenex to wipe your tears. (_;)
So where can I get 4k for free? good for you believing all the marketing hype and paying extra for 4k sources; well done - at least you are helping the economy..
remember poor picture = poor picture even if its 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k, 128k etc

Awww, poor you. We could have a whip-round for you if you like?
Come out of the dark ages and get yourself a non-sky digital source with 1080p output..... you'll never regret it :)
#21
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.
I'd laugh more that those people buying TVs without 4K. You don't pay a premium for 4K anymore.
Besides, there are plenty of 4K sources coming online. Most stuff in 4K is amazing. So stop laughing and go grab a Kleenex to wipe your tears. (_;)
So where can I get 4k for free? good for you believing all the marketing hype and paying extra for 4k sources; well done - at least you are helping the economy..
remember poor picture = poor picture even if its 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k, 128k etc
Awww, poor you. We could have a whip-round for you if you like?
Come out of the dark ages and get yourself a non-sky digital source with 1080p output..... you'll never regret it :)
Thank you for confirming my point; for many people its not worth the money and can lead to a poorer picture on SD sources.

When I am in the market for a 65" TV I will look for an OLED hdr one. 4K the new 3D?
#22
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.
I'd laugh more that those people buying TVs without 4K. You don't pay a premium for 4K anymore.
Besides, there are plenty of 4K sources coming online. Most stuff in 4K is amazing. So stop laughing and go grab a Kleenex to wipe your tears. (_;)
So where can I get 4k for free? good for you believing all the marketing hype and paying extra for 4k sources; well done - at least you are helping the economy..
remember poor picture = poor picture even if its 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k, 128k etc
Awww, poor you. We could have a whip-round for you if you like?
Come out of the dark ages and get yourself a non-sky digital source with 1080p output..... you'll never regret it :)
Thank you for confirming my point; for many people its not worth the money and can lead to a poorer picture on SD sources.
When I am in the market for a 65" TV I will look for an OLED hdr one. 4K the new 3D?

In your case, I agree that you should definitely hang on till at least the year 2050, hopefully by then all your SD sources will have converted to 4K and it will be worth your while watching the "Dave Channel" in glorious 4K X)
#23
If I was spending this much money on a tv it would be one without the horrible motion judder you get on these.
#24
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.
I'd laugh more that those people buying TVs without 4K. You don't pay a premium for 4K anymore.
Besides, there are plenty of 4K sources coming online. Most stuff in 4K is amazing. So stop laughing and go grab a Kleenex to wipe your tears. (_;)
So where can I get 4k for free? good for you believing all the marketing hype and paying extra for 4k sources; well done - at least you are helping the economy..
remember poor picture = poor picture even if its 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k, 128k etc
Awww, poor you. We could have a whip-round for you if you like?
Come out of the dark ages and get yourself a non-sky digital source with 1080p output..... you'll never regret it :)
Thank you for confirming my point; for many people its not worth the money and can lead to a poorer picture on SD sources.
When I am in the market for a 65" TV I will look for an OLED hdr one. 4K the new 3D?
In your case, I agree that you should definitely hang on till at least the year 2050, hopefully by then all your SD sources will have converted to 4K and it will be worth your while watching the "Dave Channel" in glorious 4K X)
Nah 4k will have long gone by then (apart from adverts for it on Dave) ; it will be some other pointless feature - anything to avoid having to develop a great picture...(_;)
#25
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.
I'd laugh more that those people buying TVs without 4K. You don't pay a premium for 4K anymore.
Besides, there are plenty of 4K sources coming online. Most stuff in 4K is amazing. So stop laughing and go grab a Kleenex to wipe your tears. (_;)
So where can I get 4k for free? good for you believing all the marketing hype and paying extra for 4k sources; well done - at least you are helping the economy..
remember poor picture = poor picture even if its 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k, 128k etc
Awww, poor you. We could have a whip-round for you if you like?
Come out of the dark ages and get yourself a non-sky digital source with 1080p output..... you'll never regret it :)
Thank you for confirming my point; for many people its not worth the money and can lead to a poorer picture on SD sources.
When I am in the market for a 65" TV I will look for an OLED hdr one. 4K the new 3D?
In your case, I agree that you should definitely hang on till at least the year 2050, hopefully by then all your SD sources will have converted to 4K and it will be worth your while watching the "Dave Channel" in glorious 4K X)
Nah 4k will have long gone by then (apart from adverts for it on Dave) ; it will be some other pointless feature - anything to avoid having to develop a great picture...(_;)

HDR is the biggest improvement in image quality since colour TV. The difference compared to normal 8-bit images is much more obvious than SD vs HD.


Edited By: HedgyHoggy on Aug 10, 2016 16:13
#26
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.
I'd laugh more that those people buying TVs without 4K. You don't pay a premium for 4K anymore.
Besides, there are plenty of 4K sources coming online. Most stuff in 4K is amazing. So stop laughing and go grab a Kleenex to wipe your tears. (_;)
So where can I get 4k for free? good for you believing all the marketing hype and paying extra for 4k sources; well done - at least you are helping the economy..
remember poor picture = poor picture even if its 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k, 128k etc
Awww, poor you. We could have a whip-round for you if you like?
Come out of the dark ages and get yourself a non-sky digital source with 1080p output..... you'll never regret it :)
Thank you for confirming my point; for many people its not worth the money and can lead to a poorer picture on SD sources.
When I am in the market for a 65" TV I will look for an OLED hdr one. 4K the new 3D?

So many contradictions in your statement.

It's highly unlikely you would be able to purchase anything other than 4k HDR panels now, never mind in the future.

Simply because the panel can display 4k resolution doesn't mean it isn't capable of scaling the source input to produce a good image.

There's not a massive amount of 4k material out there, but what is there isn't necessarily expensive. For example, to get Netflix 4k, it's £2 per month more than HD and you get more profiles. YouTube 4k is free.

Upscaling Blu-ray players are very competent at displaying 4k images from standard Blu-ray, which many people already own, prices start at around £50.
#27
moob
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.
I'd laugh more that those people buying TVs without 4K. You don't pay a premium for 4K anymore.
Besides, there are plenty of 4K sources coming online. Most stuff in 4K is amazing. So stop laughing and go grab a Kleenex to wipe your tears. (_;)
So where can I get 4k for free? good for you believing all the marketing hype and paying extra for 4k sources; well done - at least you are helping the economy..
remember poor picture = poor picture even if its 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k, 128k etc
Awww, poor you. We could have a whip-round for you if you like?
Come out of the dark ages and get yourself a non-sky digital source with 1080p output..... you'll never regret it :)
Thank you for confirming my point; for many people its not worth the money and can lead to a poorer picture on SD sources.
When I am in the market for a 65" TV I will look for an OLED hdr one. 4K the new 3D?
So many contradictions in your statement.

It's highly unlikely you would be able to purchase anything other than 4k HDR panels now, never mind in the future.

Simply because the panel can display 4k resolution doesn't mean it isn't capable of scaling the source input to produce a good image.

There's not a massive amount of 4k material out there, but what is there isn't necessarily expensive. For example, to get Netflix 4k, it's £2 per month more than HD and you get more profiles. YouTube 4k is free.

Upscaling Blu-ray players are very competent at displaying 4k images from standard Blu-ray, which many people already own, prices start at around £50.

HDR could well be the standard that continues rather than 4k. To scale an sd signal well to 4k requires a good 4k tv; the cheaper ones don't scale that well.

Netflix has limited content. Personally I would be much more interested in watching 4k bluray films but I would much prefer oled and hdr than 4k and hdr; blacks rendered as dark grey are still dark grey regardless of whether it's 4k, 8k, 16k, 64k, 128k..
#28
HedgyHoggy
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.
I'd laugh more that those people buying TVs without 4K. You don't pay a premium for 4K anymore.
Besides, there are plenty of 4K sources coming online. Most stuff in 4K is amazing. So stop laughing and go grab a Kleenex to wipe your tears. (_;)
So where can I get 4k for free? good for you believing all the marketing hype and paying extra for 4k sources; well done - at least you are helping the economy..
remember poor picture = poor picture even if its 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k, 128k etc
Awww, poor you. We could have a whip-round for you if you like?
Come out of the dark ages and get yourself a non-sky digital source with 1080p output..... you'll never regret it :)
Thank you for confirming my point; for many people its not worth the money and can lead to a poorer picture on SD sources.
When I am in the market for a 65" TV I will look for an OLED hdr one. 4K the new 3D?
In your case, I agree that you should definitely hang on till at least the year 2050, hopefully by then all your SD sources will have converted to 4K and it will be worth your while watching the "Dave Channel" in glorious 4K X)
Nah 4k will have long gone by then (apart from adverts for it on Dave) ; it will be some other pointless feature - anything to avoid having to develop a great picture...(_;)
HDR is the biggest improvement in image quality since colour TV. The difference compared to normal 8-bit images is much more obvious than SD vs HD.
I have'nt seen HDR in the flesh but my gut feel is that it requires a better panel to get a good improvement in the picture; I can't see cheaper TVs being trully HDR compliant (Ultra HD Premium). I don't know if HDR inherently displays blacks better than normal LCD and whether or not OLED, would still has the advantage over HDR, in this area. HDR does seem though that it could be here to stay.
#29
afroylnt
HedgyHoggy
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.
I'd laugh more that those people buying TVs without 4K. You don't pay a premium for 4K anymore.
Besides, there are plenty of 4K sources coming online. Most stuff in 4K is amazing. So stop laughing and go grab a Kleenex to wipe your tears. (_;)
So where can I get 4k for free? good for you believing all the marketing hype and paying extra for 4k sources; well done - at least you are helping the economy..
remember poor picture = poor picture even if its 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k, 128k etc
Awww, poor you. We could have a whip-round for you if you like?
Come out of the dark ages and get yourself a non-sky digital source with 1080p output..... you'll never regret it :)
Thank you for confirming my point; for many people its not worth the money and can lead to a poorer picture on SD sources.
When I am in the market for a 65" TV I will look for an OLED hdr one. 4K the new 3D?
In your case, I agree that you should definitely hang on till at least the year 2050, hopefully by then all your SD sources will have converted to 4K and it will be worth your while watching the "Dave Channel" in glorious 4K X)
Nah 4k will have long gone by then (apart from adverts for it on Dave) ; it will be some other pointless feature - anything to avoid having to develop a great picture...(_;)
HDR is the biggest improvement in image quality since colour TV. The difference compared to normal 8-bit images is much more obvious than SD vs HD.
I have'nt seen HDR in the flesh but my gut feel is that it requires a better panel to get a good improvement in the picture; I can't see cheaper TVs being trully HDR compliant (Ultra HD Premium). I don't know if HDR inherently displays blacks better than normal LCD and whether or not OLED, would still has the advantage over HDR, in this area. HDR does seem though that it could be here to stay.

There two HDR TV standards, one for LCD and one for OLED,

'But how can OLED, with its brightness issues, qualify for HDR compatibility which demands much higher brightness levels than standard TVs? Well, the UHD Alliance has got around the problem by introducing two standards:

STANDARD 1: More than 1,000 nits peak brightness and less than 0.05nits black level.

STANDARD 2: More than 540 nits brightness and less than 0.0005 nits black level.

While standard one demands higher brightness and tolerates a higher black level, standard two tolerates a lower brightness and demands a lower black level. This means manufacturers looking to make LED HDR TVs, which most are, will abide by standard one, while OLED TVs will be able to gain the Ultra HD Premium label by conforming to standard two.

And that’s it. In the grand scheme of things, it won’t matter which type of TV you have as to whether it will be HDR compatible or not. But if you want to get technical, LED TVs will give you an HDR image with better peak brightness but less deep blacks, whiled OLED TVs will give you an HDR image with lower peak brightness but deeper blacks.


Read more at http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/hdr-tv-high-dynamic-television-explained#TCX8CbD1XTO3mLyk.99'
#30
afroylnt
moob
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
afroylnt
Sharpharp
Whoever bought this, put your hands up because I want to laugh at you.
Only a mug would buy this first gen LG OLED effort (at any price)
Sure but only after you have finished laughting at the guilibility of the all the people who have brought 4k Tvs thinking it was a worth while feature over a better picture.
I'd laugh more that those people buying TVs without 4K. You don't pay a premium for 4K anymore.
Besides, there are plenty of 4K sources coming online. Most stuff in 4K is amazing. So stop laughing and go grab a Kleenex to wipe your tears. (_;)
So where can I get 4k for free? good for you believing all the marketing hype and paying extra for 4k sources; well done - at least you are helping the economy..
remember poor picture = poor picture even if its 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k, 128k etc
Awww, poor you. We could have a whip-round for you if you like?
Come out of the dark ages and get yourself a non-sky digital source with 1080p output..... you'll never regret it :)
Thank you for confirming my point; for many people its not worth the money and can lead to a poorer picture on SD sources.
When I am in the market for a 65" TV I will look for an OLED hdr one. 4K the new 3D?
So many contradictions in your statement.
It's highly unlikely you would be able to purchase anything other than 4k HDR panels now, never mind in the future.
Simply because the panel can display 4k resolution doesn't mean it isn't capable of scaling the source input to produce a good image.
There's not a massive amount of 4k material out there, but what is there isn't necessarily expensive. For example, to get Netflix 4k, it's £2 per month more than HD and you get more profiles. YouTube 4k is free.
Upscaling Blu-ray players are very competent at displaying 4k images from standard Blu-ray, which many people already own, prices start at around £50.
HDR could well be the standard that continues rather than 4k. To scale an sd signal well to 4k requires a good 4k tv; the cheaper ones don't scale that well.
Netflix has limited content. Personally I would be much more interested in watching 4k bluray films but I would much prefer oled and hdr than 4k and hdr; blacks rendered as dark grey are still dark grey regardless of whether it's 4k, 8k, 16k, 64k, 128k..

There's nothing really wrong with oled 4k HDR, all will remain and set the standard for all TVs to come, whether or not they become affordable is the big question.

http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/oled55e6-201604274285.htm
#31
Call or email them, I got refunded within a few days. :D

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Looking for Twitter login?
Top of Page
Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!