Michael Jackson - The Essential (2CD) £6.99 @ Bang CD - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit
-244Expired

Michael Jackson - The Essential (2CD) £6.99 @ Bang CD

Ricardo Kaka Avatar
7y, 4m agoFound 7 years, 4 months ago
Michael Jackson - The Essential (2CD)

CD 1:
ABC (The Jackson 5)
Got To Be There
Ben
Shake Your Body
Off The Wall
She's Out Of My Life
The Girl Is Mine (With Paul McCartney)
Beat It
Human Nature
I Just Can't Stop Loving You

CD 2:
The Way You Make Me Feel
Dirty Diana
Smooth Criminal
Black Or White
In The Closet
Heal The World
You Are Not Alone
They Don't Care About Us
I Want You Back
The Love You Save (The Jackson 5)
Rockin' Robin
Blame It On The Boogie
Don't Stop Til You Get Enough
Rock With You
Can You Feel It
Billie Jean
Wanna Be Startin' Something
P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing)
Thriller

Bad
Man In The Mirror
Another Part Of Me
Leave Me Alone
Remember The Time
Who Is It
Will You Be There
Earth Song
You Rock My World

Cheapest By A Fair Bit.. Next Cheapest £8.93 @ Tesco.. Or £11.99 At Most Other Places
Deal Tags:
More From BangCD:

All Comments

(18) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#1
http LINK REMOVED
Do not post links to illegal download websites
#2
MJ's been dead a over a week now, no more sympathy buying needed.
#3
I think you've put the wrong price.. shouldn't it be £6.99?

it might get a bit warmer if you change it
#4
Captain Hook
I think you've put the wrong price.. shouldn't it be £6.99?

it might get a bit warmer if you change it


:oops: Sorry Mate, Typo.. Fixed Now Though :thumbsup:
banned#5
Im not sure if I'm the only one but I'm deeply offended by the jokes surrounding Michael Jackson's death over the past week. The man was truly special he touched me in ways only a catholic priest would understand.
#6
SHOWMAN36
Im not sure if I'm the only one but I'm deeply offended by the jokes surrounding Michael Jackson's death over the past week. The man was truly special he touched me in ways only a catholic priest would understand.


No, you're not the only one, I feel the same about all these tasteless jokes. So many immature a***holes in this world.

I suppose it's what he would have wanted...
#7
Rubisco
No, you're not the only one, I feel the same about all these tasteless jokes. So many immature a***holes in this world.

I suppose it's what he would have wanted...


+1. Jacko = Legend.
#8
wondering why so cold, seems like a good price to me. would help if the link was to the actual product though.
banned#9
copthis1;5681499
Lets paly a game.......................what do the following have in common

Michael Jackson, Jonathan King and Gary Gkitter.......... answers on a postcard please. :roll:

They were all involved in the music industry.

Now lets play, Which one is the odd one out, Michael Jackson, Jonathan King or Gary Glitter.....

Michael Jackson, as he was found not guilty.
#10
Try to get it the coldest ever! No more MJ guys
#11
N20Y1D
They were all involved in the music industry.

Now lets play, Which one is the odd one out, Michael Jackson, Jonathan King or Gary Glitter.....

Michael Jackson, as he was found not guilty.


To be fair, so was R Kelly, even though there was clear video evidence of him shagging a 14 year old, so you can't exactly trust the judgement of US courts where the rich and famous are concerned.

I don't think Michael did do it though, for the simple reason that of the hundreds of kids who hung around with him at Neverland, only 2 made allegations. If he had molested kids I'm sure there would be more.
banned#12
N20Y1D;5683069
They were all involved in the music industry.

Now lets play, Which one is the odd one out, Michael Jackson, Jonathan King or Gary Glitter.....

Michael Jackson, as he was found not guilty.


I believe he also payed one of his "special friends" 20 million dollars to keep quiet a strange act of an innocent man dont you think?
banned#13
SHOWMAN36;5687040
I believe he also payed one of his "special friends" 20 million dollars to keep quiet a strange act of an innocent man dont you think?



Not really, he's loaded and figured it was better to do go down that road rather than spend millions on legal fees and years and years going through the courts knowing full well that even when cleared of child abuse there will always be idiots who refuse to accept the verdict.

Also the fact Chandler father (his mother didnt believe the charges ) accepted money speaks volumes, any parent who honestly beleived there child had been molested would want revenge not a fat pay cheque (which he could have fought for after the criminal charges).
banned#14
Rubisco;5683444
To be fair, so was R Kelly, even though there was clear video evidence of him shagging a 14 year old, so you can't exactly trust the judgement of US courts where the rich and famous are concerned.
.


If there was "clear video evidence of him shagging a 14 year old" then he would have been found guilty also would the parents of the girl involved have told the jury it wasnt her if it was?
#15
N20Y1D
If there was "clear video evidence of him shagging a 14 year old" then he would have been found guilty also would the parents of the girl involved have told the jury it wasnt her if it was?


There are any number of valid reasons why the parents would deny it was her.

If it wasn't her then don't you think it would have come to light who it actually was?
banned#16
Rubisco;5687881
There are any number of valid reasons why the parents would deny it was her.

If it wasn't her then don't you think it would have come to light who it actually was?


I think if it was "clear video evidence" then they would have had no choice other than to identify her.

This is the perfect example of why Jackson paid off Chandlers father.....
#17
N20Y1D
I think if it was "clear video evidence" then they would have had no choice other than to identify her.

This is the perfect example of why Jackson paid off Chandlers father.....


It's not grainy CCTV footage. It's an explicit home sex video involving a clearly identifyable R Kelly and somebody who looks underage.

Can you think of a possible scenario whereby an innocent R Kelly facing such accusations would not immediately identify the girl in the video if she was of legal age?
banned#18
Rubisco;5689053
It's not grainy CCTV footage. It's an explicit home sex video involving a clearly identifyable R Kelly and somebody who looks underage.

Can you think of a possible scenario whereby an innocent R Kelly facing such accusations would not immediately identify the girl in the video if she was of legal age?


Maybe she was married and didnt want her life ruined? Why couldnt the prosecution produce the victim?


He was cleared on all 14 charges.

However you seem convinced she was underage, so i think we should leave it there as i believe the watching of underage sex videos is a little bit illegal.... :whistling:

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Top of Page
Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!