only pay when you sell on ebay - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HotUKDeals, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HotUKDeals app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit
-237Expired

only pay when you sell on ebay

£0.00 @ eBay
only pay when you sell on ebay from 01.02.17 till 28.02.17 Read More
Ryanallen1994 Avatar
4m, 3w agoFound 4 months, 3 weeks ago
only pay when you sell on ebay from 01.02.17 till 28.02.17
More From eBay:

All Comments

(6) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
1 Like #1
Hey, is that not always the case. Never paid before I have sold
1 Like #2
Bendown
Hey, is that not always the case. Never paid before I have sold


yeah good point but I think it means like no insertion fees if it doesnt sell maybe anyway cold ha.
suspended 3 Likes #3
Another **** gimmick from these arrogant enforcers, What they should be doing is getting rid of the illegal enforcer 10% on p+p, Blanket charging all sellers for a very small minority of p+p abusers is not what a company like this should do but i am afraid they are doing it and using it to grab even more profit.Lowering the final FVF to 7% and no basic listing fees ever, That way along with their sister company paypal the fee would be 10%ish overall fee which is good for an online platform and would make a lot more people happier as a seller and reverse the growing percieved hatred for this massively profitable company that uses its vast profits to buy up any up and coming threats to their monopoly at any price, Just google their aquisitions from billions of profit and you will see that what they are doing is buying a monopoly which should be illegal and they should be fined massively. If they did what i said they would have as more if not more profit and they would just be the best place overall and could not be beaten because they have a unique platform that is brilliant for buyers but is quite clearly abusing sellers who do all the work.
#4
Glamwampam
Another **** gimmick from these arrogant enforcers, What they should be doing is getting rid of the illegal enforcer 10% on p+p, Blanket charging all sellers for a very small minority of p+p abusers is not what a company like this should do but i am afraid they are doing it and using it to grab even more profit.Lowering the final FVF to 7% and no basic listing fees ever, That way along with their sister company paypal the fee would be 10%ish overall fee which is good for an online platform and would make a lot more people happier as a seller and reverse the growing percieved hatred for this massively profitable company that uses its vast profits to buy up any up and coming threats to their monopoly at any price, Just google their aquisitions from billions of profit and you will see that what they are doing is buying a monopoly which should be illegal and they should be fined massively. If they did what i said they would have as more if not more profit and they would just be the best place overall and could not be beaten because they have a unique platform that is brilliant for buyers but is quite clearly abusing sellers who do all the work.


If they reduce their profits by decreasing their commission, "they will make as much, if not more profit" ..?
#5
j3remy42
Glamwampam
Another **** gimmick from these arrogant enforcers, What they should be doing is getting rid of the illegal enforcer 10% on p+p, Blanket charging all sellers for a very small minority of p+p abusers is not what a company like this should do but i am afraid they are doing it and using it to grab even more profit.Lowering the final FVF to 7% and no basic listing fees ever, That way along with their sister company paypal the fee would be 10%ish overall fee which is good for an online platform and would make a lot more people happier as a seller and reverse the growing percieved hatred for this massively profitable company that uses its vast profits to buy up any up and coming threats to their monopoly at any price, Just google their aquisitions from billions of profit and you will see that what they are doing is buying a monopoly which should be illegal and they should be fined massively. If they did what i said they would have as more if not more profit and they would just be the best place overall and could not be beaten because they have a unique platform that is brilliant for buyers but is quite clearly abusing sellers who do all the work.


If they reduce their profits by decreasing their commission, "they will make as much, if not more profit" ..?


past your bedtime..
suspended#6
j3remy42
Glamwampam
Another **** gimmick from these arrogant enforcers, What they should be doing is getting rid of the illegal enforcer 10% on p+p, Blanket charging all sellers for a very small minority of p+p abusers is not what a company like this should do but i am afraid they are doing it and using it to grab even more profit.Lowering the final FVF to 7% and no basic listing fees ever, That way along with their sister company paypal the fee would be 10%ish overall fee which is good for an online platform and would make a lot more people happier as a seller and reverse the growing percieved hatred for this massively profitable company that uses its vast profits to buy up any up and coming threats to their monopoly at any price, Just google their aquisitions from billions of profit and you will see that what they are doing is buying a monopoly which should be illegal and they should be fined massively. If they did what i said they would have as more if not more profit and they would just be the best place overall and could not be beaten because they have a unique platform that is brilliant for buyers but is quite clearly abusing sellers who do all the work.
If they reduce their profits by decreasing their commission, "they will make as much, if not more profit" ..?
My point being a lot more people would be selling items on there if the fees were lower so the volume in sales would increase and they would make even more profit because of sheer volume and they would restore perceptions as being the best place to sell goods and be the cheapest, The problem is there is to many greedy crooks running the Company as it stands, with large donations to people like Hillary Cliton to enforce and protect their monopoly and inforce collections of fees that are illegal in my view With the charge on p+p being a step to far.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Top of Page
Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!