Panasonic Lumix FZ48 Bridge Camera - 1/3 off (was £299) now £199.00 argos
Panasonic Lumix FZ48 Bridge Camera - 1/3 off (was £299) now £199
Featuring an impressive 24x optical zoom and 25mm wide-angle lecia lens, this Panasonic FZ48 bridge digital camera allows you take breathtakingly crisp and clear shots, as well as capturing Full HD quality video. The FZ48 also boasts an optical image stabiliser for reduced blur and a hi-speed CCD sensor for increased light sensitivity and even better image quality.
•Panasonic.
•12.1 megapixels.
•Black.
•CCD sensor.
•Focal length of 4.5-108mm.
•24 x optical zoom.
•32 x digital zoom.
•View finder.
•8 focus points in the viewfinder.
•3in screen.
•TFT LCD screen.
•Minimum ISO rating 100 and maximum ISO rating 1600.
•Shutter speed of 1/2000 to 60 sec.
•Image stabilisation.
•Optical anti-blur.
•Continuous shooting 3.7fps.
•Accepts SD, SDHC and SDXC memory card formats.
•24 scene modes.
•Built-in flash.
•1080 HD recording .
•Video capture video capture with sound and video playback with sound.
•PictBridge compatible.
•Includes strap, shoulder strap and USB cable.
•24 scene modes.
•Features intelligent scene mode feature.
•HDMI connection.
•Requires 1 x Li-Ion batteries (included).
•Size H7.9, W12, D9.1cm.
•Weight 454g.
•Manufacturer's 1 year.
EAN/MPN/UPC/ISBN: 5025232639762


Top Comments (1)
The DSLR will have a better image quality, especially at low light levels. The sensor in this thing is very small, unlike the sensors in DSLRs or compact system cameras like the Nex. The smaller sensor also gives you much less depth of field, DSLRs are better at taking pictures with a sharp subject and a nice smooth background. A DSLR has an optical viewfinder, this one has an electronic one. A DSLR has exchangeable lenses and flashes. This thing is pretty compact, and has a great zoom range, getting lenses to cover this range on an SLR is quite expensive. In short, this is practical for travel, whereas a DSLR gives you more creative control. I have used a predecessor to this camera and a DSLR, both give great pictures and it is hard to distinguish a 20x30cm print. At a pixel level the difference is obvious and clearly in the DSLR' s favour, but that only matters for really large prints.
All Comments (46)
Jump to unread Post a Commenthttp://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/Products/LUMIX+Digital+Cameras/LUMIX+Digital+Cameras/DMC-FZ48/Overview/7902620/index.html
Voted hot, though.
Other options for similar cameras for bargain prices........
HS20exr or HS30exr from Fuji refurb site with 10% off using the code found in many HUKD threads.
I don't think I have ever found anything in stock close to me in Argos that has been posted up on HKUD.
Hope that helps
Other options for similar cameras for bargain prices........
HS20exr or HS30exr from Fuji refurb site with 10% off using the code found in many HUKD threads.
I just bought the Hs30exr from Amazon last week. Fuji make very very good bridge cameras - manual zoom and focus is a massive plus in my opinion
Non-interchangeable lens.
I have the g2 micro which is very good
As a really rough guide, in order of ascending quality, compacts then bridge then micros then dslrs
That said this Fz48 is good as you don't have to change lens it's a superzoom
Difficult to compare really as they are not the same things. This one has a great zoom range with good picture quality. A G3 will be a couple of steps up in quality but you'll spend an enormous amount on lenses to get anywhere near this zoom range (possibly into 4 figures!).
The DSLR will have a better image quality, especially at low light levels. The sensor in this thing is very small, unlike the sensors in DSLRs or compact system cameras like the Nex. The smaller sensor also gives you much less depth of field, DSLRs are better at taking pictures with a sharp subject and a nice smooth background. A DSLR has an optical viewfinder, this one has an electronic one. A DSLR has exchangeable lenses and flashes. This thing is pretty compact, and has a great zoom range, getting lenses to cover this range on an SLR is quite expensive. In short, this is practical for travel, whereas a DSLR gives you more creative control. I have used a predecessor to this camera and a DSLR, both give great pictures and it is hard to distinguish a 20x30cm print. At a pixel level the difference is obvious and clearly in the DSLR' s favour, but that only matters for really large prints.