NOT REFURB. HP Pavilion G6 Laptop, Intel Core i5, 6GB RAM, 500GB HDD, 1Yr Warranty, Windows7 + free optical mouse & bull guard antivirus @ ebay (save-on-laptops) £399.97
HP Pavilion G6 Laptop, Intel Core i5, 6GB RAM, 500GB HDD, 1Yr Warranty, Windows7
ebay Item number: 261016481272
Brand New
Processor Intel® Core™ i5-2450M Dual Core (2.5GHz, Intel Sandy Bridge Architecture, 3MB Cache, Intel Turbo Boost up to 3.1GHz)
Screen 15.6" (HP BrightView, LED Backlit, 1366 x 768 HD 16:9 Screen)
Operating System Windows 7 Home Premium Edition 64-bit
RAM 6GB (DDR3)
Hard Drive 500GB
Optical Drive DVD Rewriter (Records DVDs 8x & CDs 24x & Dual Layer Super Multi)
Graphics Integrated (Intel® HD 3000 Graphics with up to 1274MB Shared Memory)
Wireless LAN Wireless (802.11b/g/n Wireless)
Network Card 10/100Mbps Fast Ethernet
Integrated Webcam Integrated Webcam with Microphone
Card Reader 2-in-1 card reader ( SD, MMC )
USB Ports 3x USB 2.0 ports
VGA Port 1 External VGA Port
HDMI 1x HDMI Port
Warranty HP Pavilion 12 Month Warranty (Also use for Consumer Compaq's)
Speakers Integrated Altec Lansing Sound System
Kensington Lock Kensington lock slot
Charge Time 2.5 Hours
Battery Life 3-4 Hours (up to 4 hours with power management)
Weight 2-3 Kg (This Model 2.5 Kg)
similar to previous deal but with i5 processor
http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/hp-pavilion-g6-1331ea-15-6-quad-core-amd-a8-3520m-laptop-silver-6gb-750gb-dedicated-1207722


All Comments (13)
Jump to unread Post a CommentI've been told to avoid this? Is that a bad graphics thingymibob? (I know nothing!)
I've been told to avoid this? Is that a bad graphics thingymibob? (I know nothing!)
I had bought Inspiron 15R before which has same thing. Not seen any probs till date.
Edited By: gazjon on May 04, 2012 07:58
then this might be your interest link
...but still holding out for a lower price!
Edited By: solid on May 04, 2012 09:02
I've been told to avoid this? Is that a bad graphics thingymibob? (I know nothing!)
It depends.....
Do you do a lot of heavy (or actually even light) gaming/video editing/photo processing?
Because if you do, these graphics will be absolutely useless...
And BTW, just so you know, I'd wait a bit longer for the new Ivy Bridge computers to come out, because these Sandybridge ones will be reduced to nothing....methinks... (_;)
I've been told to avoid this? Is that a bad graphics thingymibob? (I know nothing!)
It depends.....
Do you do a lot of heavy (or actually even light) gaming/video editing/photo processing?
Because if you do, these graphics will be absolutely useless...
And BTW, just so you know, I'd wait a bit longer for the new Ivy Bridge computers to come out, because these Sandybridge ones will be reduced to nothing....methinks... (_;)
Really? Because my PC also has an i5 processor with 6gb of RAM and I can play Starcraft 2 on medium settings with a smooth frame rate. I think it'd be able to handle video editing with ease.
I've been told to avoid this? Is that a bad graphics thingymibob? (I know nothing!)
It depends.....
Do you do a lot of heavy (or actually even light) gaming/video editing/photo processing?
Because if you do, these graphics will be absolutely useless...
And BTW, just so you know, I'd wait a bit longer for the new Ivy Bridge computers to come out, because these Sandybridge ones will be reduced to nothing....methinks... (_;)
You're living in the dark ages, Intel HD3000 is actually pretty good.
You wont notice a difference in photoshop unless you use the gpu accelarated features, which I dont use on my i3.
You can do light gaming also.
I've been told to avoid this? Is that a bad graphics thingymibob? (I know nothing!)
It depends.....
Do you do a lot of heavy (or actually even light) gaming/video editing/photo processing?
Because if you do, these graphics will be absolutely useless...
And BTW, just so you know, I'd wait a bit longer for the new Ivy Bridge computers to come out, because these Sandybridge ones will be reduced to nothing....methinks... (_;)
You're living in the dark ages, Intel HD3000 is actually pretty good.
You wont notice a difference in photoshop unless you use the gpu accelarated features, which I dont use on my i3.
You can do light gaming also.
Intel's onboard graphics never come close to "pretty good" to me. Dedicated graphics is a must for me personally.
I've been told to avoid this? Is that a bad graphics thingymibob? (I know nothing!)
It depends.....
Do you do a lot of heavy (or actually even light) gaming/video editing/photo processing?
Because if you do, these graphics will be absolutely useless...
And BTW, just so you know, I'd wait a bit longer for the new Ivy Bridge computers to come out, because these Sandybridge ones will be reduced to nothing....methinks... (_;)
You're living in the dark ages, Intel HD3000 is actually pretty good.
You wont notice a difference in photoshop unless you use the gpu accelarated features, which I dont use on my i3.
You can do light gaming also.
Intel's onboard graphics never come close to "pretty good" to me. Dedicated graphics is a must for me personally.
So saying an HD3000 is useless for image editing is correct in your eyes?
I've been told to avoid this? Is that a bad graphics thingymibob? (I know nothing!)
It depends.....
Do you do a lot of heavy (or actually even light) gaming/video editing/photo processing?
Because if you do, these graphics will be absolutely useless...
And BTW, just so you know, I'd wait a bit longer for the new Ivy Bridge computers to come out, because these Sandybridge ones will be reduced to nothing....methinks... (_;)
You're living in the dark ages, Intel HD3000 is actually pretty good.
You wont notice a difference in photoshop unless you use the gpu accelarated features, which I dont use on my i3.
You can do light gaming also.
Intel's onboard graphics never come close to "pretty good" to me. Dedicated graphics is a must for me personally.
So saying an HD3000 is useless for image editing is correct in your eyes?
It is not useless. You at least need a graphics card (dedicated or not) to get things to work.
The HD3000 works, but it only barely does the job.
It does not have dedicated ram and the performance is significantly slower than dedicated graphics.
For example, when you are using photoshop, having a nvidia or amd gpu does give you the advantage with better graphics acceleration.
Edited By: kafability on May 05, 2012 01:08
I've been told to avoid this? Is that a bad graphics thingymibob? (I know nothing!)
If you want to play games then it has limited use, if you type hd3000 and the name of the game you want to play on youtube you can sometimes get an idea of how a game will run using that GPU, for example >
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1uK9ZoQ84U
Bear in mind it's getting on for 5 years old that game, but it can give you an idea.
Here's Crysis 2 >
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g00Y5K-SE-4
The example above is using a desktop cpu not a laptop cpu, so it can be deceptive as some people have overclocked the GPU.
Edited By: fishmaster on May 05, 2012 08:52