Samsung 50" Full HD Freeview Plasma £784.10 delivered [using attached code] @ Bargain Crazy - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit
Use attached code to get this price!
* Samsung 50" Full HD Freeview Plasma
* Model No PS50P96FDX/XEU
* Resolution 1920 x 1080
* Contrast Ratio 15000:1
* Brightness 1000 cd/m2
* Ultra Filter Bright Technology
* Samsung's unique DNIE technology
* 3D Digital Natural Image Engine
* 3D Comb filter
* Digital noise reduction technology
* SRS TruSurround XT sound effect
* Teletext level 2.5
* 3 HDMI Sockets
* 2 SCART Sockets
* Wall mountable (bracket not supplied)
More From Bargain Crazy:
×
Get the Hottest Deals Daily
Stay informed. Once a day, we'll send you the deals our members voted as the best.
Failed
amibees Avatar
7y, 5m agoFound 7 years, 5 months ago
Options

All Comments

(15) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#1
is this better than a lcd?
#2
rashriaz
is this better than a lcd?


Different for sure.

Power hungry monster too.
#3
I personally will stay away from Plasma, LCD is better power efficiency and generally lasts longer.
#4
Here we go again with the Plasma vs LCD debate! :p
#5
Bring on OLED I say! :-D


Oh, and while I have never been a fan of Plasma TVs, 50"'s for less than £800 is stunning, it really was not all that long ago people were paying 2k + for similar.
#7
Ah OLED, the technology of tomorrow, tomorrow. Whatever happened to SED? that was supposed to kick the ass off LCD and Plasma.

Best not to stir up an LCD Vs Plasma debate. Suffice to say they both have pros and cons.
#8


On power consumption 291 KWh/24hr Power usage when up and running.

thats 12Kw per hour at my rekoning. Cant be right
banned#9
good for the money tho
#10


The LG is far superior to the Samsung Plasma!!;-)

The Samsung is a 2007 model whereas the LG is a 2009 model and it seems that LG's 2009 range is on a par with Panasonics low to mid range 2009 lineup which is quite an achievement.

The 50" LG is available for £699.11 from amazon:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B001UHMT88/?tag=ppprice1-21
#11
pdhroche
I personally will stay away from Plasma, LCD is better power efficiency and generally lasts longer.

The power difference will be less than £20 per year. LCDs lasting longer is silly, as by the time a plasma screen dulls down even half way (10 - 15 years), the vast majority of people would have gotten a new television.
#12
I got the LG recently and cannot fault it. For £700 you are not going to get a better 50" screen.
#13
Unless you are using HD sources 24/7, at this size it'll be plasma for sure. LCD's strength (sharpness) would be it's downfall at such a large picture, with artifacts and noise (ringing too) becoming more visible. Of course, it depends on your viewing distance. That's why the largest LCDs tend to be 46" and then it's all plasma.

Oh and LG over Samsung. Samsung's 2007 range often make people look like they are wearing tons of foundation.
#14
I have the Samsung PS50Q97HDX which is only the 720p version of this plasma set.

I have one of those Green Efergy Energy meters in my home, and my plasma TV set draws around 300W/h.

I'd say it's on from 8am till midnight every day [sometimes longer]

.3kw/h * 18.2p per kwH * 16 hrs = 87.3 p/day [£318.86 p.a].

I have noticed a difference on my energy bills and recently changed to a new supplier suspecting they were overcharging me. Once I'd bought the energy meter and checked the usage myself against their meter, I can put the extra electric cost to the plasma tv.

Picture quality is excellent, but it's very energy hungry - be advised.

Jav
#15
This says this model takes a ridiculous 520W http://www.cdfreaks.com/hardware/product/56226-samsung-PS50P96FDX.html

Not only is there the costs of this, but you also have to live with the sweltering heat output of these electric burners regardless of the weather.

The life expectancy of the panel is probably a red herring because long before the years for it to become dim the expensive dinosaur will probably have been scrapped as unresellable due to rises in energy costs and vastly more efficient new models.

Voting cold as the energy wastage is too hot.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Top of Page
Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!