Hooked on hotukdeals|Join HUKD!

Sandisk Ultra 60gb £39.98 at novatech

nonumbnonumb

60gb version of the sandisk ultra ssd

Read Speed: 280MB/Sec, Write Speed: 270MB/Sec, Flash: MLC, Controller: SandForce SF-1200

Add £2.39 for delivery if you cant collect.

Also the 120gb posted here recently is matched at £65
http://www.novatech.co.uk/products/components/harddrives-internal/solidstate/upto128gb/sdssdh-120g-g25.html

I know its another ssd deal but I think its pretty good value - As far as I know the cheapest 60gb SSD with decent speeds. Good deal for those who don't want/need 120gb.

Quidco/TCB too

TIP: Get the Best Deals In Your Inbox

or
1254° Hot Cold

Top Comments (2)

    silver145
    JakeBiles
    VashTheStampede
    CDR
    If you have a media PC, why would you need an SSD if the files are located on a network?

    I'm not trolling, I have a HTPC (Acer Revo with XBMC) and have the files stored on this desktop in the study, but the HTPC is never off, and only runs mkv's, so what advantage would you get from running it on a SSD?


    fast bootup

    Actually you use ROM located on the motherboard for the start up procedure, making it irrelevant.


    haha, yes, the OS is installed into ROM, oh where did my education go so wrong....
    polly69
    Heres a little help for you all who are buying a small SSD as a boot drive when using one of these small drive when you set windows up on your machine it allocates some of the HDD as a paging file also known as virtual memory this is usually the same as the actual amount of physical memory in your machine, my main i7 desktop has 16gb of vengeance ram and has also allocated 16gb of virtual ram for paging meaning im loosing 16gb of SSD storage which is a fair chunk, its not so bad on a 120gb+ drive but on a 60 or 64gb drive its a lot as most laptops now come with a minimum of 4gb so that's 4gb of a small boot drive gone. My laptop has 8gb so if i had my spare 64gb SSD in i would loose 8gb of space. The thing is a paging file was only really useful when systems had a small amount of ram as there wasn't enough ram so it would use the allocated space on the HDD which was slower but did the trick, new systems with 4gb or more don't need the paging file so to get your space back disable the paging file altogether.

    The thing i would do would be to open the task manager and check the performance tab when your using your machine as you normally would if there a good amount of headroom disable it. If i had 4gb of memory i would probably change the page file to 1gb to be safe earning you back 3gb of precious SSD space but anything over 4gb and just disable it as the chance of eating 6 or 8gb of memory is pretty much impossible so its a useless waste of space.

    Right click computer and choose properties,
    on the left hand side of the properties page will be advanced system settings, click that.
    That should land you on the advanced tab if it doesn't choose the advanced tab.
    Choose the settings button in the top box performance.
    then choose the advanced tab if it doesnt dump you there.
    The second box down will be virtual memory choose change
    untick automatically manage paging file at the top.
    Highlight C or what ever your boot device letter is and click no paging file followed by set, windows will complain just click yes.
    Windows will then ask to rebbot to make the cange and when you reboot you will have your space back.

    This also works on desktops so if your like me and have 16gb of memory and a SSD disable your page file and gain your 16gb of space back.

All Comments (114)

Jump to unread Post a Comment
1
    GAVINLEWISHUKD
    In before somebody post this in a few hours for the same price from Amazon, Ebuyer, Dabs*



    *Delete as appropriate!
    Oneday77
    I paid £60 for a refurb C300 60gb about a year ago so this is a good deal.
    CDR
    If you have a media PC, why would you need an SSD if the files are located on a network?

    I'm not trolling, I have a HTPC (Acer Revo with XBMC) and have the files stored on this desktop in the study, but the HTPC is never off, and only runs mkv's, so what advantage would you get from running it on a SSD?
    spannerzone
    I guess the silent hard drive would be the benefit for media pc perhaps?
    nonumb
    CDR
    If you have a media PC, why would you need an SSD if the files are located on a network?

    I'm not trolling, I have a HTPC (Acer Revo with XBMC) and have the files stored on this desktop in the study, but the HTPC is never off, and only runs mkv's, so what advantage would you get from running it on a SSD?


    Its a bedroom pc so doesnt stay on and silent is best, also a revo, dualboot ubuntu and open elec. I have SSDs in all my pcs and really cant stand slow computers - at this price I think its worth it for the speed upgrades. I'll probably actually swap this with a kingston one I have in another pc as this is faster.

    Edited By: nonumb on May 22, 2012 21:58
    VashTheStampede
    CDR
    If you have a media PC, why would you need an SSD if the files are located on a network?

    I'm not trolling, I have a HTPC (Acer Revo with XBMC) and have the files stored on this desktop in the study, but the HTPC is never off, and only runs mkv's, so what advantage would you get from running it on a SSD?


    fast bootup - people generally consider htpc's as an appliance, rather than a computer, faster boot would make it feel more like that.

    Edited By: VashTheStampede on May 22, 2012 21:59
    JakeBiles
    VashTheStampede
    CDR
    If you have a media PC, why would you need an SSD if the files are located on a network?

    I'm not trolling, I have a HTPC (Acer Revo with XBMC) and have the files stored on this desktop in the study, but the HTPC is never off, and only runs mkv's, so what advantage would you get from running it on a SSD?


    fast bootup

    Actually you use ROM located on the motherboard for the start up procedure, making it irrelevant.
    hellyea12
    It's not your hard drive thats limiting the stream bandwidth, it's the network connection. Getting SSD to HTPC will give you virtually no gain, since good ol' hdd's, or even flash drives are good enough to keep codecs/system ect.
    nonumb
    georgecat
    VashTheStampede
    CDR
    If you have a media PC, why would you need an SSD if the files are located on a network?

    I'm not trolling, I have a HTPC (Acer Revo with XBMC) and have the files stored on this desktop in the study, but the HTPC is never off, and only runs mkv's, so what advantage would you get from running it on a SSD?


    fast bootup




    Yeah the boot speed of an always-on PC is critical :p

    I dont have it always on though. Its a second media pc and so doesnt get used as much so not really great to waste energy having it always on.

    Edited By: nonumb on May 22, 2012 22:03
    mbuckhurst
    CDR
    If you have a media PC, why would you need an SSD if the files are located on a network?

    I'm not trolling, I have a HTPC (Acer Revo with XBMC) and have the files stored on this desktop in the study, but the HTPC is never off, and only runs mkv's, so what advantage would you get from running it on a SSD?


    I'd understand a person wanting an SSD more than a person who leaves a HTPC switched on all the time, in reality it must be possible to find a window where there is utterly no point in leaving the machine running? I know I had mine off for hours every day, but it was possible to schedule the machine to boot at specific times.

    In fact the reason I'm reading this thread is because I'm considering this would be a perfect purchase for my HTPC, that uses an external 3TB drive for local data and an HP microserver with 12TB for networked data, but is powered by an Atom, so might perform better with a faster disk.

    mike
    MBeeching
    It secretly pains me to see SSD prices so low these days :p
    nonumb
    MBeeching
    It secretly pains me to see SSD prices so low these days :p


    I know what you mean I paid £160 for 2 40gb kingstons a couple of years ago.

    I still think its one of the best upgrades you can make to a pc. Especially if the hardware is a bit old, stick on a lightweight linux distro add a ssd and its like brand new.
    smicer07
    Worth paying extra for the 128?
    Simulacra
    These are getting so cheap now. Every SSD ive fitted has improved the machines speed no end. Don't worry about it being 'another ssd deal' either. Keep 'em coming abd ignore the few idiot ssd deal haters.
    kypok
    will wait till it drops to £20 :)
    jwsg
    The future is .... http://www.play.com/PC/PCs/4-/32140250/Crucial-CT256V4SSD2-256GB-V4-Solid-State-Drives/Product.html slower it seems - not the new Crucial we're expecting
    silver145
    JakeBiles
    VashTheStampede
    CDR
    If you have a media PC, why would you need an SSD if the files are located on a network?

    I'm not trolling, I have a HTPC (Acer Revo with XBMC) and have the files stored on this desktop in the study, but the HTPC is never off, and only runs mkv's, so what advantage would you get from running it on a SSD?


    fast bootup

    Actually you use ROM located on the motherboard for the start up procedure, making it irrelevant.


    haha, yes, the OS is installed into ROM, oh where did my education go so wrong....
    999tigger
    Yep all these deals are encouraging so that ssds will be standard and the price will fall much more. For anything with programs, then I think 120gb is the min usable. In the last 12 months thoygh they seem to have dropped loads.
    nonumb
    999tigger
    Yep all these deals are encouraging so that ssds will be standard and the price will fall much more. For anything with programs, then I think 120gb is the min usable. In the last 12 months thoygh they seem to have dropped loads.

    I disagree. I have 80gb in my main rig, 64gb in my netbook and 30gb in my media centre. I think you only need 120gb if you have lots of games, or a lot of programmes.
    plewis00
    nonumb
    999tigger
    Yep all these deals are encouraging so that ssds will be standard and the price will fall much more. For anything with programs, then I think 120gb is the min usable. In the last 12 months thoygh they seem to have dropped loads.

    I disagree. I have 80gb in my main rig, 64gb in my netbook and 30gb in my media centre. I think you only need 120gb if you have lots of games, or a lot of programmes.


    Kind of missing the point, 120GB is a reasonable minimum for a laptop - I had a Corsair Force F60 in my Alienware and while it was fast (I'll ignore the constant blue screens), I only had space for Windows and World of Warcraft.

    This is a good deal if you're after a 60GB drive then but unless you can pair it with a larger mechanical disk (17" DTR laptops mainly or desktops), it would be nearly pointless for a laptop user.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

I Approve
Your Comments On This Post
Comment Preview
Close

PRIVATE MESSAGE

Close
Sorry, you can’t currently send PMs. Once you’re a more active member of the forum, the PM service will be unlocked for you.
Welcome to HUKD!
Close
Join the Community