The Omen Blu-Ray - £6.99@Play.com - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HotUKDeals, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HotUKDeals app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit
186Expired

The Omen Blu-Ray - £6.99@Play.com

£6.99 @ Play.Com
Posted a few weeks back at £7.99, now £6.99. Pretty good price for blu-ray, tons of extras too. Read More
n64play Avatar
7y, 10m agoFound 7 years, 10 months ago
Posted a few weeks back at £7.99, now £6.99. Pretty good price for blu-ray, tons of extras too.
Deal Tags:
More From Play.Com:

All Comments

(18) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#1
Excellent price heat and rep.
#2
I'm glad that's the original. :p

Heat added.
#3
Why would they put a 1976 film onto blu-ray?
I mean, why?
#4
winemart
Why would they put a 1976 film onto blu-ray?
I mean, why?

:lol:

good price op!
#5
winemart
Why would they put a 1976 film onto blu-ray?
I mean, why?


Because it's a bloody good film :thumbsup:
#6
winemart
Why would they put a 1976 film onto blu-ray?
I mean, why?


Well Star Wars is a 1977 film and would look great on blu ray and I think would be the one film nost would want to see released on blu ray.

Dr No and From Russia with Love are even older, have been released on Blu ray and look superb. Its a common misconception that old films cannot look good. I have not see the Omen on BD though so cannot comment on its video quality.
banned#7
winemart;5911930
Why would they put a 1976 film onto blu-ray?
I mean, why?

You obviously dont realise that films are a higher resolution than blu-ray :whistling:
#8
Seems to get a decent review for blu-ray transfer here http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/movies.php?id=997&show=review
Voted hot.
#9
csiman
You obviously dont realise that films are a higher resolution than blu-ray :whistling:


Don't be silly! Digital cameras are also better quality than negatives! :whistling:
#10
Almost, I heard that snapshot film was equivalent to about 20 megapixels.
banned#11
ChocoBootehMan;5913126
Don't be silly! Digital cameras are also better quality than negatives! :whistling:

you really havent got a clue. :whistling:

try blowing a 10mp picture up on to a 100ft screen and see how bad it looks lol

I;m sure someone else can explain better how foolish you just made yourself look :roll:
#12
csiman
you really havent got a clue. :whistling:

try blowing a 10mp picture up on to a 100ft screen and see how bad it looks lol

I;m sure someone else can explain better how foolish you just made yourself look :roll:


Was that a sarcastic reply or did you really not see my sarcasm? :D
#13
[SIZE="7"]DO NOT BUY THIS[/SIZE]

I absolutely love this film, excitedly ordered it from Play.com a month or so ago. The transfer is absolute rubbish, completely the same as the DVD. I have a large collection of Blu-Rays and this one is the worst I have ever seen. Waste of time & money.
banned#14
ChocoBootehMan;5914930
Was that a sarcastic reply or did you really not see my sarcasm? :D

Opps! - I thought you were serious. Should have added a wink icon ;-)

:oops:
banned#15
TrueBeliever88;5918036
[SIZE=7]DO NOT BUY THIS[/SIZE]

I absolutely love this film, excitedly ordered it from Play.com a month or so ago. The transfer is absolute rubbish, completely the same as the DVD. I have a large collection of Blu-Rays and this one is the worst I have ever seen. Waste of time & money.

have you watched it all as the review does state the first part of the film isnt great but then it does turn into an excellent transfer.
#16
winemart
Why would they put a 1976 film onto blu-ray?
I mean, why?


35mm film has a detail level far better than HD televisions - even a 1930s film will look better on blu ray if a decent quality print is needed.
a lot of people seem to think that films for the cinema were filmed at television resolution before that advent of HDTV. ( wrong people ).
do photos from 1970 have worse picture quality than ones taken in 2009 ?
#17
They missed a trick here, the price should have been £6.66
#18
Rusty!
They missed a trick here, the price should have been £6.66


:w00t:

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Top of Page
Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!