Zotac GeForce GTX 1050Ti 4 GB Mini Graphics Card £127.98 from Amazon - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HotUKDeals, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HotUKDeals app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit
82

Zotac GeForce GTX 1050Ti 4 GB Mini Graphics Card £127.98 from Amazon

£127.98 @ Amazon
Was looking for a RX480 when seen this, seems like a good price for the 4GB version Specs: CUDA cores 768 Video Memory 4GB GDDR5 Memory Bus 128-bit Engine Clock Base: 1392 MHz Boost:1506 MHz … Read More
UN_98 Avatar
1w, 1d agoFound 1 week, 1 day ago
Was looking for a RX480 when seen this, seems like a good price for the 4GB version

Specs:
CUDA cores 768
Video Memory 4GB GDDR5
Memory Bus 128-bit
Engine Clock Base: 1392 MHz
Boost:1506 MHz
Memory Clock 7 GHz
PCI Express 3.0
Display Outputs DisplayPort 1.4
HDMI 2.0b
DL-DVI
Recommended Power Supply 300W
Power Consumption 75W
Card Length 174mm x 111.15mm

Review:
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/review/graphics-cards/zotac-geforce-gtx-1050-ti-4gb-oc-edition-review-3652294/

camelcamelcamel:
https://uk.camelcamelcamel.com/Zotac-GeForce-1050Ti-Mini-Graphics/product/B01M8M5T4T?utm_campaign=chrome_ext&utm_medium=camelizer&utm_source=
UN_98 Avatar
1w, 1d agoFound 1 week, 1 day ago
Options

All Comments

(4) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
1 Like #1
This is nowhere near the RX480 though, even if it's a good price for the 1050ti.
#2
Lahn
This is nowhere near the RX480 though, even if it's a good price for the 1050ti.
Yes, it's a good price but the 1050Ti is around 65% the speed of a RX480 according to CB
https://www.computerbase.de/thema/grafikkarte/rangliste/
or 63% according to TPU (although they only have an 8GB 480 in their bench):
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_1060_Armor/30.html
Uses a lot less power though.
TPU card only: 57W vs 163W (106W difference)
CB complete sytem power: 130W vs 215W (85W difference)
The difference between them is possible explained by the hardware scheduler on the Radeon vs the drivers doing that work on Nvidia cards, but none of these benches show the CPU load. While I appreciate the likes of TPU measuring the card only, if different GPUs stress the CPU differently it doesn't tell the whole story; I guess it goes to show yet again that if you want the complete picture you have to read multiple reviews. Maybe the calculated TDP which Guru3D use is more accurate:
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/palit_geforce_gtx_1050_ti_kalmx_review,8.html


Edited By: Gkains on Apr 18, 2017 10:19
#3
I guess it's a little worse value than a RX480, but will be really nice for people who either don't have a 6/8pin PCI-E power plug, or just wants a more efficient GPU.
#4
Voted hot, good price. I just don't like that its a single slot card. I've my eye on the Gigabyte version, more outputs, backplate, and takes a 6pin connector so hopefully overclocks better, but it is £13 more expensive.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Top of Page
Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!