Does Hot Deals Voting System Need A Rethink? - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

All Comments

(100) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
Page:
[admin] 2 Likes #1
I'm happy to take ideas to improve the system.

I don't think forced commenting is an improvement though.
banned#2
kfc deals are rubbish so deserve big minus scores imo

we can't all be wrong!
#3
If people had to comment each time they vote the threads would be huge though.
But I get what you mean
#4
I voted that deal cold because it was a carp deal.
banned#5
How about a certain amount of votes a day. People would have to think about their votes then

Wouldn't be suprised if the poster of that thread left. People should be shamed of theselves that mass voted COLD

The worlds gone bloomin mad!
#6
Banjo String
How about a certain amount of votes a day.

Wouldn't be suprised if the poster of that thread left. People should be shamed of theselves that mass voted COLD

The worlds gone bloomin mad!


Says the person who is a serial cold voter often giving the most ridiculous explanations as to why they have voted cold :roll:
#7
well if it got to minus 400 then it had ALOT of cold votes the maximun is 9pts as i remember and alot of people dont have that
banned 1 Like #8
Banjo String;4041925
How about a certain amount of votes a day. People would have to think about their votes then

Wouldn't be suprised if the poster of that thread left. People should be shamed of theselves that mass voted COLD

The worlds gone bloomin mad!

Maybe the cold voters have a bit more respect for animal welfare than you do. You sir, are the one who should be ashamed for promoting Kentucky Fried Cruelty. :x

Have some free education:-

http://www.kentuckyfriedcruelty.com/
[helper]#9
Banjo String


People should be shamed of theselves that mass voted COLD


I didn't mass vote cold - I did it all by myself:thumbsup:
banned#10
tregs;4042144
I didn't mass vote cold - I did it all by myself:thumbsup:

lol - me too :-D
banned#11
csiman
Maybe the cold voters have a bit more respect for animal welfare than you do. You sir, are the one who should be ashamed for promoting Kentucky Fried Cruelty. :x

Have some free education:-

http://www.kentuckyfriedcruelty.com/



OMG suppose everyone that voted cold breeds there own chickens and cows and sheep for their meat and then slaughters them humanely??

It's the way of the world !
#12
Banjo String
Wouldn't be suprised if the poster of that thread left. People should be shamed of theselves that mass voted COLD


Nah, that poster will never leave (believe me, we've tried!!).

It was posted as a result of a thread in Misc.

Anyway, where's the 500+ mobile deal? Sadly there hasn't been a 500+ mobile contract deal in over two weeks, and that was the iPhone...
#13
Banjo String
How about a certain amount of votes a day. People would have to think about their votes then

Wouldn't be suprised if the poster of that thread left. People should be shamed of theselves that mass voted COLD

The worlds gone bloomin mad!


Banjo String
Voting cold due to overated player. Pele is like an old time Robbie Savage


Your right people have gone mad with crazy cold voting, somting should be done :whistling:
banned#14
SCARFACE 1618
Your right people have gone mad with crazy cold voting, somting should be done :whistling:


Hello please refrain from wading into my threads or ones i have posted in and re posting my old posts. havent you got something better to do like posting deal etc are you my stalker or someting

Mods take note of SCARFACE 1618
4 Likes #15
Sorry, your stupidity keeps me amused. You slate everyones post off then complain when it happens to yours. I'd rather try to post a good deal rather than lots of bad ones like you. And as for asking the mods to take not of me why don't i ask my mommy to tell me of for you instead :oops: ban me, don't ban me either way i can still view deals :p
1 Like #16
SSSSSSSNNNNNNNOOOOOOOORRRRRRRREEEEEEEEE!!

Banjo, you're driving me crackers!!!!!
#17
SCARFACE 1618
Sorry, your stupidity keeps me amused. You slate everyones post off then complain when it happens to yours. I'd rather try to post a good deal rather than lots of bad ones like you. And as for asking the mods to take not of me why don't i ask my mommy to tell me of for you instead :oops: ban me, don't ban me either way i can still view deals :p


have some rep for that ^

banjo, you are just a loser and your threads are proving it!
#18
I'd also like to point out that (according to his profile), this guy has only been registered 5 days! LOL
#19
duckmagicuk2
Nah, that poster will never leave (believe me, we've tried!!).

It was posted as a result of a thread in Misc.

Anyway, where's the 500+ mobile deal? Sadly there hasn't been a 500+ mobile contract deal in over two weeks, and that was the iPhone...


lol ducky u cheeky beggar haha! i thought that kfc thread was immense, can admin stick it bk up or one of the mods please, i was loling during work, got to -200 in like 30mins haha!
#20
urmum
have some rep for that ^

banjo, you are just a loser and your threads are proving it!


Thanks for that lol and i agree with you 100%
#21
SCARFACE 1618
Thanks for that lol and i agree with you 100%


u really should look at what u bring the site when ppl rep u for flaming on another member.
2 Likes #22
acecatcher3
u really should look at what u bring the site when ppl rep u for flaming on another member.


And you should look through the 101 reasons why everybody is doing it to him before you comment!
2 Likes #23
SCARFACE 1618
And you should look through the 101 reasons why everybody is doing it to him before you comment!


Seconded. Anyway, look at this for Banjo:

Join Date: 07-01-2009
Total Posts: 256 (50.03 posts per day).

And he wants a restriction on how many votes are done a day? lol.... maybe a post restriction is in order - that way, people would make their posts count, rather than going on a politically correct garbage spewing spree. If you've got time to do 50 posts a day, maybe a hobby is in order for you Banjo?
#24
[email protected] hypocrisy of the OP,posts cold votes all over the place,i've mentioned it to him/her numerous times before,laughable!
#25
duckmagicuk2;4042222
Nah, that poster will never leave (believe me, we've tried!!).


I just had to LOL at that. :w00t:
#26
emasu
I just had to LOL at that. :w00t:


haha u know its not hukd without me emasu!
[Moderator]#27
Rory Joe
Seconded. Anyway, look at this for Banjo:

Join Date: 07-01-2009
Total Posts: 256 (50.03 posts per day).

And he wants a restriction on how many votes are done a day? lol.... maybe a post restriction is in order - that way, people would make their posts count, rather than going on a politically correct garbage spewing spree. If you've got time to do 50 posts a day, maybe a hobby is in order for you Banjo?


LOL or maybe a job :whistling:
#28
duckmagicuk2;4042222

Anyway, where's the 500+ mobile deal? Sadly there hasn't been a 500+ mobile contract deal in over two weeks, and that was the iPhone...


I think the member was referring to these (which didn't reach 500)

http://www.hotukdeals.com/item/303612/three-mix-and-match-500-tariff-lg-v/
http://www.hotukdeals.com/item/316114/lg-u990-viewty-refurbished-with-the/
#29
banned#30
csamual


How was that a cold vote?
Not voting.

Profiteering over a dead man is immoral voted WRONG


People need to stop this bloomin childish witchhunt!

I'm learnin from me mistakes here. giving valid reasons now mentioning ive not voted eitherway when i comment on a deal for gods sake stop!
banned#31
Superman Christopher Reeve Collection: 9dvd: Box Set £17.99 @ HMV

Banjo String:
Not voting.

Profiteering over a dead man is immoral voted WRONG


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

LOL - Stupidity has no limits
#32
Banjo String
Hello please refrain from wading into my threads or ones i have posted in and re posting my old posts. havent you got something better to do like posting deal etc are you my stalker or someting

Mods take note of SCARFACE 1618



Banjo String; 4042941
Superman Christopher Reeve Collection: 9dvd: Box Set £17.99 @ HMV

Banjo String:
Not voting.

Profiteering over a dead man is immoral voted WRONG



:thumbsup: You can't whine about cold votes if you don't correctly use the system yourself. I've made some wrong cold votes in the past but placing bad votes based on it being immoral due to some obsured reason is beyond the norm.

If you want to slow down the effects some stupid cold voters have, maybe giving the powers to the longer serving members or maybes with so much feedback or something along those lines to be able to take cold deals straight out of the cold if there quite clearly wrong votes. They would have to submit a reason and would stop the minus voting on items that are voted for practically no given reason. Or on the other side give them powers to boast items up to 25 heat. Only a thought.
banned#33
At the end of the day, are people really that bothered about the temperature? I barely notice it.

Makes me laugh how people throw their toys out the pram if their deal goes cold and then stamp their feet demanding an explanation of why the cold voting. It's hardly a big deal in the wider scheme of things.
1 Like #34
csiman
At the end of the day, are people really that bothered about the temperature? I barely notice it.

Makes me laugh how people throw their toys out the pram if their deal goes cold and then stamp their feet demanding an explanation of why the cold voting. It's hardly a big deal in the wider scheme of things.


Because it effects the overall effect of that item? If its a good deal and you know its going to benefit someone then the cold voting does have a massive effect, if the item goes hot more people see it plain and simple. The site even defaults to the hot deals straight away when you log on to it. So really a narrow minded remark there. Unless you use the search function which is pretty much useless due to the amount of information on this site, then you have your work cut out. The hot deals section has saved me a lot of money in the past, and I try and scope the site for any deals but sometimes there just isn't time and I missed a few deals based on cold votes or lack of hot votes due to cold voters having issues with a member or a deal causing the deal to go freezing. Which is not the point in the website.

:whistling: Rant over
banned#35
This thread is about the voting situation.

As I've said before to other people stop stalking me and reposting my old posts. so childish

MODS TAKE NOTE
2 Likes #36
Banjo String
This thread is about the voting situation.

As I've said before to other people stop stalking me and reposting my old posts. so childish

MODS TAKE NOTE


You're like a stuck record. I've seen in multiple threads you accuse people of "stalking" you. Let me explain it nice, big and clear so that it's hard for you NOT to understand.

[SIZE="3"]NO ONE IS STALKING YOU, BUT YOU HAVE MADE NEARLY 300 POSTS IN 6 DAYS AND AS A RESULT YOU ARE EVERYWHERE AND IN NEARLY EVERY NEW DEAL. YOU DON'T HAVE OLD POSTS BECAUSE 6 DAYS ISN'T OLD.[/SIZE]

You are a total simpleton :x
1 Like #37
I think all the bad feeling comes from having cold as an option. Why not just remove it as an option. Good deals would gain heat bad ones would just labour at or around zero. That way you can easily spot the good deals and no-one takes offence by having people slate their deals.

The site could then simply amend what is hot and cold based on a combination of time posted and heat reached.
banned#38
eglons
I think all the bad feeling comes from having cold as an option. Why not just remove it as an option. Good deals would gain heat bad ones would just labour at or around zero. That way you can easily spot the good deals and no-one takes offence by having people slate their deals.

The site could then simply amend what is hot and cold based on a combination of time posted and heat reached.


Good suggestion! Well done.

Also not being able to see the temp til after you've voted hot or nuetral
#39
Banjo String
Good suggestion! Well done.

Also not being able to see the temp til after you've voted hot or nuetral


If you had to vote on every deal just to get it's rating searching for bargains would become an extremely laborious process.
#40
eglons
I think all the bad feeling comes from having cold as an option. Why not just remove it as an option. Good deals would gain heat bad ones would just labour at or around zero. That way you can easily spot the good deals and no-one takes offence by having people slate their deals.

The site could then simply amend what is hot and cold based on a combination of time posted and heat reached.


So an expensive tin of beans at say 99p would have the same heat as a tin at £3.55?

Banjo String
Good suggestion! Well done.

Also not being able to see the temp til after you've voted hot or nuetral


lol. :-D

How about not being able to vote unless you've bought the said item and posted a picture of your receipt?

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!