JayDubya:
My sentiments exactly. I find it astounding that so many people are happy for mono. I'd disagree with the other opinion that expensive mono is worse than cheap stereo. It may be a crystal clear signal, but in most cases, mono aside, channels are broadcast at low bit rates. If mono is so good then why do Pure sell add on speakers to make many of their expensive units into [v expensive] stereo?
The same people will buy iPods too I guess, which also have inferior sound quality.
I have put comments like this before, but....
To actually perceive a difference between stereo and mono you need to have clear separation between the left/R speakers which is dependant on your listening position. For a small compact unit that is stereo you would need to have it about 30cm in front of your face (or directly behind) to get any sort of stereo affect. Also by putting two speakers in a small stereo unit and having dual amps and two speakers for the same costs of manufacturing you could have a higher quality mono amp and single speaker which can arguably give you a higher quality reproduction across frequencies albeit with the sacrifice of the stereo effect.
I have 3 DAB radios in my house, and I purposely got a mono unit as my bed side radio as when I am listening to that one I usually have one ear pressed against a pillow….
This is a great little unit and I mite expand my DAB fleet to 4, hot deal.