Bankers' bonuses axed by people power - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

Bankers' bonuses axed by people power

WoolyM Avatar
5y, 9m agoPosted 5 years, 9 months ago
Ok so its in Holland. But it will be interesting to watch the situation, with many in this county claiming it can't be done.

Dutch bankers' bonuses axed by people power
An online campaign has overturned ING's executive pay policy, and the mood in Amsterdam is getting increasingly militant about bonuses at bailed-out banks
WoolyM Avatar
5y, 9m agoPosted 5 years, 9 months ago
Options

All Comments

(36) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
banned#2
Inb4 the usual defenders of the indefensible.
1 Like #3
So lots of the best/most profitable bankers from Holland will now be looking for jobs elsewhere so they can get their £100k bonuses, so less tax for Holland.
Genius.
#4
couldnt give a monkeys if they left our country
99.9% people would agree
1 Like #5
sickly sweet
So lots of the best/most profitable bankers from Holland will now be looking for jobs elsewhere so they can get their £100k bonuses, so less tax for Holland.
Genius.

Just think what could happen if governments at the G20 or suchlike all agreed such a policy.
Lots more revenue and less need for cuts.
#6
WoolyM
sickly sweet
So lots of the best/most profitable bankers from Holland will now be looking for jobs elsewhere so they can get their £100k bonuses, so less tax for Holland.
Genius.

Just think what could happen if governments at the G20 or suchlike all agreed such a policy.
Lots more revenue and less need for cuts.

Can you read?
#7
Very shortsighted of the Dutch.
#8
autolesbona
WoolyM
sickly sweet
So lots of the best/most profitable bankers from Holland will now be looking for jobs elsewhere so they can get their £100k bonuses, so less tax for Holland.
Genius.


Just think what could happen if governments at the G20 or suchlike all agreed such a policy.
Lots more revenue and less need for cuts.


Can you read?


Read what?
1 Like #9
WoolyM
sickly sweet
So lots of the best/most profitable bankers from Holland will now be looking for jobs elsewhere so they can get their £100k bonuses, so less tax for Holland.
Genius.


Just think what could happen if governments at the G20 or suchlike all agreed such a policy.
Lots more revenue and less need for cuts.


If that was the case (very unlikely as it would be to the detriment of governments to sign up to it), then the best bankers would go to Hong Kong and such countries outside of the G20.
It really is a case of cutting your nose to spite your face - good for jo public to get short term confidence in their government but long term loss of tax revenue through individuals and companies transferring abroad (of course they want the best of the best, if one employee can make a bank £40million, and give him £100k bonus, is that not better than a lesser skilled employee who makes the bank £10million getting no bonus?)
#10
There was an interesting point raised in one of the comments at the end of the article which I do have some sympathy with

Talented people do not work simply for money. They don't have to. Those that do - as our recent history neatly illustrates - are not the most talented....
2 Likes #11
Again this was a link from one of the comments in the article
A study carried out by MIT about what motivates us.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc (10 mins long)
#12
guv
Inb4 the usual defenders of the indefensible.


i wonder who your thinking of? :{
banned#13
sickly sweet
If that was the case (very unlikely as it would be to the detriment of governments to sign up to it), then the best bankers would go to Hong Kong and such countries outside of the G20.


Have China been kicked out?
#14
guv
sickly sweet
If that was the case (very unlikely as it would be to the detriment of governments to sign up to it), then the best bankers would go to Hong Kong and such countries outside of the G20.

Have China been kicked out?
Thnk they are still in if this wiki document is correct. Interesting that they have the EU as one member but then also UK, France etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-20_major_economies






Edited By: WoolyM on Mar 29, 2011 18:38
banned#15
candi
couldnt give a monkeys if they left our country
99.9% people would agree


So you would be happy if the financial services industry and associated taxe receipts left this country?
banned 2 Likes #16
candi
couldnt give a monkeys if they left our country
99.9% people would agree


99.9% of people would be pretty stupid then
#17
So would you leave then Filth if this happened in the UK?

Edited By: WoolyM on Mar 29, 2011 18:51
banned#18
WoolyM
So would you leave then Filth if this happened in the UK?


I don't work in the banking industry.

But if this did happen and our economy did suffer, I think a lot of people would leave (not just bankers).
#19
Well obviously the bankers families as well. But you know Hong Kong is quite crowded and I really cant see it being bolthole of everyone in the banking industry.
banned#20
FilthAndFurry
candi
couldnt give a monkeys if they left our country
99.9% people would agree


So you would be happy if the financial services industry and associated taxe receipts left this country?


He didn't say that. I would imagine he's referring to the fat cats with their noses in the trough.

Funnily a mate of mine who used to get crazy bonuses as the treasurer of an Arab bank in London, did exactly that and left for Geneva approx 10 years ago. We were over there with them when this hedge fund problem first surfaced in the US and he predicted within a year it would be causing a recession and serious problems in the banking industry in the UK and worldwide. He lost his job as the treasurer for an Arab bank based in Geneva 18 months ago through cutbacks.

He always used to say he got paid for doing booger all and whilst he's a very intelligent man, he admitted his bonuses were unjustified. Strangely, he explained to me what the problems we would be facing were and why its a ridiculous situation they got themselves into. But these guy were experts and couldn't, yet I could see instantly how idiotic they had been. Go figure. (Clue... Greed)

No one is irreplaceable and lets be fair, with the mess they've made, a replacement couldn't do much worse. The banks could give us better interest rates on the millions they'd be saving too. X)

.


Edited By: guv on Mar 29, 2011 19:13
1 Like #21
Are not bonuses taxed at a higher rate than corporate profits? I may be wrong but wouldn't that mean that the country actually gets less tax receipts?
banned#22
colinsunderland
candi
couldnt give a monkeys if they left our country
99.9% people would agree


99.9% of people would be pretty stupid then

+1
banned#23
Less bonuses equates to more money the bank will no doubt find ways of getting rid of through 'tax efficient' means so the economy won't see any more from corporation tax, and they'll actually see less from income tax revenue.

It still amazes me how short sighted some people on here are. A knee jerk to stop a bankers bonus has consequences far worse that you care to think about.

But as long as that nasty banker isn't getting that new Porsche, I guess you're happy.

Silly economics from some very silly people.

Edited By: JonnyTwoToes on Mar 29, 2011 19:38
1 Like #24
There is a member on here who claims to be a banker and if he is typical of them then this is good news if it comes to the UK as they would appear to be annoying little oiks

However the same member is also know for being a blatant liar and a supporter of terrorism though so will reserve my final judgment on bankers for now


Edited By: boothy on Mar 29, 2011 19:42
banned#25
Power to the people, right on.
#26
point to note is that it was these highly paid financial ppl that got us in this mess. I say more regulation.
I wouldn't mind if they actually did a good job but...
despite the above we still need them grrr
#27
You may want to check what pay rises the bankers have managed to give themselves over the last 18 months. Some sources say they have increased the salaries by the amount they've reduced bonuses, in some cases upto 50%.

What's the point of banning the bonus, you'd have better luck banning the bomb!
#28
It's the price of capitalism. But the cost of any other system would be much higher imo...
#29
FilthAndFurry
candi
couldnt give a monkeys if they left our country
99.9% people would agree


So you would be happy if the financial services industry and associated taxe receipts left this country?

out of interest.....where would they all go and would their families want to go there?

pretty sick of hearing this nonsense.
banned#30
casparwhite
FilthAndFurry
candi
couldnt give a monkeys if they left our country
99.9% people would agree


So you would be happy if the financial services industry and associated taxe receipts left this country?

out of interest.....where would they all go and would their families want to go there?

pretty sick of hearing this nonsense.


Any of the emerging markets. It's not the rank and file members who are largely replaceable, but the major figures in departments who would get pay increases (in real terms due to lower taxes) to relocate and set up the new headquarters.

If even one major bank decided to do this it would irrevocably damage the reputation of 'the City' and severely damage Britain as a whole.
#31
jiminym
You may want to check what pay rises the bankers have managed to give themselves over the last 18 months. Some sources say they have increased the salaries by the amount they've reduced bonuses, in some cases upto 50%.

What's the point of banning the bonus, you'd have better luck banning the bomb!

The point is that salaries are declared to shareholders whereas bonuses are not. This makes a company appear more attractive to shareholders because the total salary bill is lower. It's a much more transparent and therefore fairer system to just pay everything as a salary

It's a very similar to MPs who were propping up their lifestyles by drawing expenses and so were able to be better off while telling voters that they were doing their bit to support the economy by drawing a small salary.
#32
FilthAndFurry
casparwhite
FilthAndFurry
candi
couldnt give a monkeys if they left our country
99.9% people would agree

So you would be happy if the financial services industry and associated taxe receipts left this country?
out of interest.....where would they all go and would their families want to go there?

pretty sick of hearing this nonsense.

Any of the emerging markets. It's not the rank and file members who are largely replaceable, but the major figures in departments who would get pay increases (in real terms due to lower taxes) to relocate and set up the new headquarters.

If even one major bank decided to do this it would irrevocably damage the reputation of 'the City' and severely damage Britain as a whole.

So did you bother to watch the study from MIT on what motivates people?
#33
FilthAndFurry
casparwhite
FilthAndFurry
candi
couldnt give a monkeys if they left our country
99.9% people would agree


So you would be happy if the financial services industry and associated taxe receipts left this country?

out of interest.....where would they all go and would their families want to go there?

pretty sick of hearing this nonsense.


Any of the emerging markets. It's not the rank and file members who are largely replaceable, but the major figures in departments who would get pay increases (in real terms due to lower taxes) to relocate and set up the new headquarters.

If even one major bank decided to do this it would irrevocably damage the reputation of 'the City' and severely damage Britain as a whole.


so where would they go ....brazil.....china......UAE?

not a chance for most family men and even the batchelors could only put up with a sub standard life in n "emerging country" for so long,regardless of the few extra quid in bonuses they probbly couldnt spend in the first place
#34
casparwhite


so where would they go ....brazil.....china......UAE?

not a chance for most family men and even the batchelors could only put up with a sub standard life in n "emerging country" for so long,regardless of the few extra quid in bonuses they probbly couldnt spend in the first place


Soldiers relocate for a lot less.
banned#35
casparwhite
FilthAndFurry
casparwhite
FilthAndFurry
candi
couldnt give a monkeys if they left our country
99.9% people would agree


So you would be happy if the financial services industry and associated taxe receipts left this country?

out of interest.....where would they all go and would their families want to go there?

pretty sick of hearing this nonsense.


Any of the emerging markets. It's not the rank and file members who are largely replaceable, but the major figures in departments who would get pay increases (in real terms due to lower taxes) to relocate and set up the new headquarters.

If even one major bank decided to do this it would irrevocably damage the reputation of 'the City' and severely damage Britain as a whole.


so where would they go ....brazil.....china......UAE?

not a chance for most family men and even the batchelors could only put up with a sub standard life in n "emerging country" for so long,regardless of the few extra quid in bonuses they probbly couldnt spend in the first place


I wouldn't want to work there, but there are plenty of young 20-somethings who look at the money on offer in places like Dubai and are literally queuing up to go. I also know of a couple of chaps working in Hong Kong, so it's not that strange.

You only have to look at people living in some places in this country that aren't ever going to 'emerge' and they seem quite content. :)
banned#36
WoolyM
FilthAndFurry
casparwhite
FilthAndFurry
candi
couldnt give a monkeys if they left our country
99.9% people would agree


So you would be happy if the financial services industry and associated taxe receipts left this country?

out of interest.....where would they all go and would their families want to go there?

pretty sick of hearing this nonsense.


Any of the emerging markets. It's not the rank and file members who are largely replaceable, but the major figures in departments who would get pay increases (in real terms due to lower taxes) to relocate and set up the new headquarters.

If even one major bank decided to do this it would irrevocably damage the reputation of 'the City' and severely damage Britain as a whole.


So did you bother to watch the study from MIT on what motivates people?


Maybe if you paid me.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!