can a traffic officer do you for speeding on the other dual carriageway? - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

can a traffic officer do you for speeding on the other dual carriageway?

the porter Avatar
6y, 8m agoPosted 6 years, 8 months ago
i was driving on the dual carriageway going south and the cop was on the other side going north i broke and noticed he broke on the other side of the road could i get done for speeding i was doing maybe 75 in a 60 cheers
Tags:
the porter Avatar
6y, 8m agoPosted 6 years, 8 months ago
Options

All Comments

(30) Jump to unreadLocked
Comments/page:
1 Like #1
this is the silly sort of question my missus comes out with, panicing
1 Like #2
No...
1 Like #3
Well in theory it only takes the testament of both officers to say you were speeding. But in reality it's not going to happen.
1 Like #4
I'm fairly sure they have to follow procedure and follow you for 1/4mile to assess your speed. I doubt they could judge it if you were both travelling towards each other and you were only 15mph over...

saying that, my knowledge is purely based on Traffic Cops and Motorway Patrol on Bravo and Dave!
1 Like #5
no I think they have to actually give you the ticket with a speed reading to prove you were speeding
banned#6
GAVINLEWISHUKD
Well in theory it only takes the testament of both officers to say you were speeding. But in reality it's not going to happen.


wrong on every level
#7
[url]www.pepipoo.com[/url]
#8
GAVINLEWISHUKD
Well in theory it only takes the testament of both officers to say you were speeding. But in reality it's not going to happen.
1 Like #9
No mate they can't. Dont worry about it, your safe.
#10
dimebars
wrong on every level


On what level? My dad was a copper for 30 years.

A testament from 2 officers to say you were in excess of the speed limit is enough. They don't need to follow you or clock your speed.
#11
dimebars
Yes

He has measured your speed using quantum physics.

His X-ray vision has also recorded your registration through the armco barrier and imprinted it on his super-chip

Clown




hahaha, I like this thank you, have some rep
#12
i just cant believe someone is asking such a silly question, homer simpson comes to mind, "DOH!"
banned#13
the porter
its not over the top at all you dont know him or he,r they say the same things everytime ive said it before and ill say it again theres not many folk i dont like on here but i cant stand him or her hes a complete tool :thumbsup:


keep going........................

better to keep quiet and have someone think you are a fool than to open your mouth and prove it beyond all reasonable doubt

or something like that
banned#14
GAVINLEWISHUKD
On what level? My dad was a copper for 30 years.

A testament from 2 officers to say you were in excess of the speed limit is enough. They don't need to follow you or clock your speed.


Maybe 30 years ago

No court in the land would convict a driver of speeding based on the testament of 2 officers without documented proof
#15
GAVINLEWISHUKD
On what level? My dad was a copper for 30 years.

A testament from 2 officers to say you were in excess of the speed limit is enough. They don't need to follow you or clock your speed.


I think your dad was winding you up, cos that is total bumph
#16
takes a thing called evidence....................
#17
yesterday i was speeding doing about 80mph in a 30 zone, today a police car went past me and slowed down and looked, is he going to do me for speeding........................
banned#18
the porter
i thought it was quite a valid question its nowt to some i have seen on here ,1 or 2 from you if i remember rightly :thumbsup:


See what thought did...............
banned#19
wickedteen
yesterday i was speeding doing about 80mph in a 30 zone, today a police car went past me and slowed down and looked, is he going to do me for speeding........................


Gerbil? Is that you?
#20
dimebars
Gerbil? Is that you?


er who? no...
#21
All too many a thread resulting in personal insults imo......
#22
dimebars
Maybe 30 years ago

No court in the land would convict a driver of speeding based on the testament of 2 officers without documented proof


He retired in 2007.

The documented proof is the statements. As I said not very likely, but possible all the same. Normally drivers that it applies to are charged with a more serious offence like dangerous driving.

pinkleponkle
I think your dad was winding you up, cos that is total bumph


Next time you see a cop you ask them. Gets used often on assault chargers where the victim doesn't make a complaint.
#23
My sister is a copper, and I spent some time as a special constable.

The testament of two officers is correct, but it has to be reasonable grounds. Were you to race past the coppers at an obvious speed whilst they were stationary, and they were then able to catch up with you then yes. They could pull you over and give you a rollocking and often a producer ( HORT1) for your documents, but proof is required if they were to issue a fixed penalty.

you were on a dual carriageway, and doing probably 15 mpg over. Now you are given a 10% limit due to speedometer differences, and if you were to get your GPS, you'd probably find that you were doing possibly 10% under the speed shown on your speedometer.

As a paramedic now, I've seen enough injuries and death caused by reckless driving, so I disapprove of all speeding regardless of how much

that's my two pence worth. Point of the matter is that you've got away with it this time
#24
Actually, on a normal road, all that is needed to get a prosecution for speeding, is an officers opinion, and a collaboration, this could be another officer, a speed gun or a speedometer.

So, YES, the opinion of two policeman IS enough to prosecute for speeding. They don't need a speed.

On a motorway, it gets even worse, they only need ONE opinion.
1 Like #25
If you broke and he broke then maybe his equipment was broken too so he couldn't record speed or anything!! If everything and everyone was broken maybe there's nothing that could be used as evidence.
banned#26
the porter
i have said what i need to say to you stick to littlewoods voucher threads :)


obviously a sore point

how much did they take from you?
#27
shibi din
If you broke and he broke then maybe his equipment was broken too so he couldn't record speed or anything!! If everything and everyone was broken maybe there's nothing that could be used as evidence.


+1:thumbsup:
banned#28
peodude;8609393
Actually, on a normal road, all that is needed to get a prosecution for speeding, is an officers opinion, and a collaboration, this could be another officer, a speed gun or a speedometer.

So, YES, the opinion of two policeman IS enough to prosecute for speeding. They don't need a speed.

On a motorway, it gets even worse, they only need ONE opinion.

hate this pish ,i know at least two bent coppers so that aint good...
#29
Were they Police, or highways agency traffic officers?
banned#30
Thread closed.

OP - Don't create a thread then use it as a launch pad for spouting offensive remarks towards other members.

Post a Comment

No more comments can be posted to this thread.
Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!