chain mail or real? - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HotUKDeals, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HotUKDeals app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

chain mail or real?

£0.00 @
got this email from a mate dont know if its chain mail or real. i hope its just chain mail Read More
bigbob909 Avatar
8y, 9m agoPosted 8 years, 9 months ago
got this email from a mate dont know if its chain mail or real.

i hope its just chain mail
bigbob909 Avatar
8y, 9m agoPosted 8 years, 9 months ago
Options

All Comments

(14) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#1
SORRY!!! BUT PLEASE TAKE TWO MINS TO READ THIS, IT MATTERS!



Do you remember February 1993 in England , when a
young boy of 3 was taken from a Liverpool shopping
centre by two 10-year-old boys?
Jamie Bulger walked away from his mother for only
a second, Jon Venables took his hand and led him out
of the mall with his friend Robert Thompson. They took
Jamie on a walk for over 2 and a half miles, along the
way stopping every now and again to
torture the poor little boy who was crying
constantly for his mummy.


Finally they stopped at a railway track where they
brutally kicked him, threw stones at him, rubbed paint
in his eyes, pushed batteries up his anus and cut his
fingers off with scissors. Other mutilations were
inflicted but not reported in the press.

N.B. :- Remember, a 3year old cannot possibly
defend themselves against a 10 year old, let alone of 2 them.

What these two boys did was so horrendous that
Jamie's mother was forbidden to identify his body.
They then left his beaten small body on railway
tracks so a train could run him over to hide the mess
they had created. These two boys, even being boys,
understood what they did was wrong, hence trying to
make it look like an accident.

This week Lady Justice Butler-Sloss has awarded
the two boys ( now men ), anonymity for the rest of
their lives when they leave custody with new
identities. They will also leave custody early only
serving just over half of their sentence.
They are being relocated to Australia to live out
the rest of their lives. They disgustingly and
violently took Jamie's life away and in return they
each get a new life!
#2
I have seen this one before. Just bin it. There is no real reason to forward it to anyone else.
#3
Oh I hate those! Chain mail... the funny ones are like "HOTMAIL WILL BE CLOSING ON 22/07/1987" yeah right. that was like 648538 years ago.
Bin ittttttttt :)
#5
twinks
I think it's not so much a chain mail, but someone trying to get across how appalling the justice system is that has allowed this to happen I remember it , my son was born 2 days after Jamie was taken, it was sickening beyond belief.


What she said but it's been around for years.
1 Like #6
THIS IS old news, i got same email over a year ago. Also agree or disagree with me but i feel very strongly that what the 2 10 years old did beggars belief iits absolutely horrendous abominable and couldnt believe any 10 year old were capable of it. Which leads me to my point what the f**** did make them do such an atrocity against a poor defenseless little boy.
What were these two 10 years old subjected to and exposed to, to make them even think or such cruelty let alone act it out. I believe they were victims too at 10 years old i played with my dolls and did ballet lessons and im only 6 years older than the boys.

It would never entered my mind to do what they did to anyone even if they had done stuff to me let alone a beautiful innocent boy. Maybe today with the widespread use of the internet and the gruesome video games kids play. Young innocent children are exposed to such things. But 15 years ago i think not.

Its not the boys fault that in the british judicial system life dont mean life. They have served their time that is set by the law of this land. Yes it should of been longer but we dont have the power to change that today here and now. But bearing in mind these boys musta suffered a bad childhood to even think let alone commit their horrific offence plus the fact they served their time.

I do believe they should be given a chance at life . In sure they wouldnt of got parole without showing remorse and undergoing a lot of pyschological help.
#7
can you serve enough time for that - I dont think so - a lifetime is not time enough, they should never have been released
1 Like #8
They don't deserve to live for what they did.

Even if they were 10.
#9
Snopes!!
banned 1 Like #10
DIVA1977
THIS IS old news, i got same email over a year ago. Also agree or disagree with me but i feel very strongly that what the 2 10 years old did beggars belief iits absolutely horrendous abominable and couldnt believe any 10 year old were capable of it. Which leads me to my point what the f**** did make them do such an atrocity against a poor defenseless little boy.
What were these two 10 years old subjected to and exposed to, to make them even think or such cruelty let alone act it out. I believe they were victims too at 10 years old i played with my dolls and did ballet lessons and im only 6 years older than the boys.

It would never entered my mind to do what they did to anyone even if they had done stuff to me let alone a beautiful innocent boy. Maybe today with the widespread use of the internet and the gruesome video games kids play. Young innocent children are exposed to such things. But 15 years ago i think not.

Its not the boys fault that in the british judicial system life dont mean life. They have served their time that is set by the law of this land. Yes it should of been longer but we dont have the power to change that today here and now. But bearing in mind these boys musta suffered a bad childhood to even think let alone commit their horrific offence plus the fact they served their time.

I do believe they should be given a chance at life . In sure they wouldnt of got parole without showing remorse and undergoing a lot of pyschological help.



well said
1 Like #11
The essence of the story is true, in that the incident did happen and those who did it were being released. It's old news though, as above, and the two are released.

There's one version of the email going around that says "Liverpool, New York".

Wikipedia also states:

From the facts disclosed at trial, at this location one of the boys threw blue modelling paint on Bulger's face. They kicked him and hit him with bricks, stones and a 22 lb (10 kg) iron bar. They then placed batteries in his mouth (although false reports claimed that the batteries were pushed up his anus were spread by a chain letter [4] that also claimed that Bulger's fingers were cut off using scissors; this is also untrue). James suffered skull fractures as a result of the iron bar being struck around his head; this wound is believed to have caused his death.


Still, ultimately one of the worst events in the history of that area.

The chain letter really doesn't give the poor lad's memory the respect it deserves in my opinion. :-(
#12
What gets me is someone woman is going to meet them and not ever know what they did and will prob go on to marry/have kids with them! They should have at least had there balls chopped off.
#13
duckmagicuk2;2413846
The essence of the story is true, in that the incident did happen and those who did it were being released. It's old news though, as above, and the two are released. There's one version of the email going around that says "Liverpool, New York". Wikipedia also states: Still, ultimately one of the worst events in the history of that area. The chain letter really doesn't give the poor lad's memory the respect it deserves in my opinion. :-(


What Wikipedia states is true. Unfortunately, some close to me (even though they were not closely involved in the case), will never be able to forget the horrific facts of what happened. The fact is Jamie was murdered in an horrific way.

However, what has happened to the guilty ones is now subject to speculation that will probably go on for years, like finding Lord Lucan. Rumours of their whereabouts will go on all the time.
1 Like #14
DIVA1977
THIS IS old news, i got same email over a year ago. Also agree or disagree with me but i feel very strongly that what the 2 10 years old did beggars belief iits absolutely horrendous abominable and couldnt believe any 10 year old were capable of it. Which leads me to my point what the f**** did make them do such an atrocity against a poor defenseless little boy.


Because it's fun to hurt people. It's a universal truth that fits for nearly all living creatures intelligent enough to experience pleasure. With some people, it extends no further than a playful nip or dig here and there before the natural instincts of social protection revulses one from issuing any more pain. With others, the part of the brain that controls the conscience either hasn't formed properly, or is being overridden by a flood of emotion, and that can make them want to absolutely obliterate a creature in the most sadistic way imaginable.

And that leads nicely into this little paragraph from the Wikipedia -

From the facts disclosed at trial, at this location one of the boys threw blue modelling paint on Bulger's face. They kicked him and hit him with bricks, stones and a 22 lb (10 kg) iron bar. They then placed batteries in his mouth (although false reports claimed that the batteries were pushed up his anus were spread by a chain letter [4] that also claimed that Bulger's fingers were cut off using scissors; this is also untrue). James suffered skull fractures as a result of the iron bar being struck around his head; this wound is believed to have caused his death.


So, they didn't

a) Rub paint into his eyes
b) Put batteries up his bum
c) Cut his fingers off

What does this tell you about the author of the email? That he (or she) is equally as sadistic as the murderers. In fact, the behavior of taking a strong moral stance in decreeing something that one takes great pleasure in is rather common - you can see the same thing happening in rampant homophobes who subsequently turn out to be gay, moral crusaders who turn out to be anything but moral (one American talkshow presenter springs to mind, a woman who is violently opinionated against most things, despite being estranged from her mother, a divorcee having cheated on her husband, and a woman who promotes love in the most hateful way imaginable - alas, I cannot recall her name), and militant anti-paedos who go on to be arrested for posessing child pr0n, to give just a few examples.

Never trust a moral crusader.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!