CO2 does not make the world warmer, the world temperature increasing raises CO2 levels. - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

CO2 does not make the world warmer, the world temperature increasing raises CO2 levels.

gileswendes@hotm Avatar
8y, 1m agoPosted 8 years, 1 month ago
I was challenged on this in a post yesterday. Just interesting to see how many people still believe that their 'carbon footprint' is a cause of global warming when all the science points at the great fusion reactor in the sky!

I'll back that up too!

http://www.skepticalscience.com/solar-activity-sunspots-global-warming.htm

The fact that CO2 levels LAG behind the temperature is clear.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm

Anyone still filled with guilt about destroying our planet?
Other Links From Make:
gileswendes@hotm Avatar
8y, 1m agoPosted 8 years, 1 month ago
Options

All Comments

(17) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#2
I believe that the Global Warming issues are a con. Anyone interested in reading the facts about this ought to read The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming. The earth had gone through various stages of warming and cooling. The whole issue is about controlling people by controlling energy. Let's face it, all dictatorships grew and were maintained through fear.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51nYmW1w22L._SL500_AA240_.jpg

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Politically-Incorrect-Global-Warming-Guides/dp/1596985011/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1224835733&sr=8-1
#3
IMO its never really been a problem, its just a huge marketing ploy for create more income (mainly goverment)
#4
read a fair bit of it, very interesting - will come back and read the rest
#5
Excellent Im Of To Eat An Endangered Species
#6
The site I cited is actually skeptical of the claim that we are not causing warming but the cases made to refute the science are poor. 97% of carbon dioxide is naturally produced...
#7
i wish i could feel some global warming cos im soooooo cold
banned#8
Its just a global conspiracy to get more money out of the plebs.
#9
there was a recent documentary in 2008 which tries to map the debate on global warming (not the "Global Warming Swindle") but I cannot retrieve the title, even through Google.
#10
The global warming theories maybe defunct but being more energy efficient with fossil fuel supplies and reducing environmental pollution are still valid factors, so reducing C02 emissions is still a sound idea.
#11
nuabdi
there was a recent documentary in 2008 which tries to map the debate on global warming (not the "Global Warming Swindle") but I cannot retrieve the title, even through Google.


[url]www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.co.uk[/url]

http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle
#12
I always tell the green brigade to get their heads out of the sand, sure we cause some of the co2, but by no means all or a majority of it. Its a good idea to cut down if you can but it wont make much difference in the long run anyway, id estimate that the human race has about 100-1000 years of existence left before it destroys itself, either through nuclear war, man made disease, or even possibly technology taking over ala i-robot/matrix
#13
[SIZE="3"][COLOR="Red"]erm ... OP, you seem to have missed the point of the website you are quoting. Ironically, you are using his website to do exactly what he is opposing! John Cook is taking issue with anti-scientific global warming scepticism (of the type you and others are promoting here!); he is not a 'global warming sceptic'! I suggest you read this CAREFULLY![/COLOR][/SIZE]

[SIZE="3"]About Skeptical Science[/SIZE]

[SIZE="3"]Skeptical Science was created by John Cook, an ex-physicist (majoring in solar physics at the University of Queensland).

My interest in global warming began when I got into some discussions with a skeptical family member who handed me a speech by Senator Inhofe. It took little research to show his arguments were misleading and lacking in science.

Since then, I've scoured peer reviewed scientific literature in an attempt to penetrate the political agendas and cherry picking. I've noticed two patterns in global warming skepticism. Firstly, many reasons for disbelieving in anthropogenic global warming (AGW) seem to be political rather than scientific. Eg - it's all a liberal plot to spread socialism and destroy capitalism (or sometimes just plain dislike for Al Gore). As one person put it, "the cheerleaders for doing something about global warming seem to be largely the cheerleaders for many causes of which I disapprove".

Beneath the politics is a more elemental instinct - an aversion to alarmism. We've been burnt before. The media predicted an ice age in the 70's which never eventuated. Y2K was going to destroy society - it was barely a hiccup. And I won't deny there are alarmists in the global warming camp. Urgent cries that the ice sheets are on the verge of sliding into the sea. Or emotional pleas to save those cute little polar bears. Sadly, alarmists seem to be the loudest voices in the global warming debate. But that doesn't change the science underneath.

So I ignore the distracting politics and ad hominem arguments. Instead, I concentrate on the science. And I noticed when the discussion did get to science, the same flawed skeptic argument continue to propogate through the blogosphere, Chinese whispers style. This website is an attempt to examine all the scientific arguments that reject AGW.[/SIZE]
#14
"And I noticed when the discussion did get to science, the same flawed skeptic argument continue to propogate through the blogosphere, Chinese whispers style."
(John Cook, [url]www.skepticalscience.com[/url])


Where have all you psuedo-scientific whisperers gone? :?

:whistling:
#15
Liddle ol' me
"And I noticed when the discussion did get to science, the same flawed skeptic argument continue to propogate through the blogosphere, Chinese whispers style."
(John Cook, [url]www.skepticalscience.com[/url])


Where have all you psuedo-scientific whisperers gone? :?

:whistling:


lol :thumbsup:
#16
[email protected]


like my reply says. its NOT global warming swindle (2006/2007). Its new in 2008
and its tone is quite the opposite to the GW Swindle i.e. mentions but refutes all arguments against global warming
#17
Warming/cooling of the earth has always been cyclical. The problem is that this particular 'warming' episode is definately accelerating due to our influence. Remeber records of this are relatively new.

Never mind though.. a global economic meltdown and pandemic of avian flu should redress the balance.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!