Concorde Alternative? - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

Concorde Alternative?

doritos Avatar
5y, 6m agoPosted 5 years, 6 months ago
Hi guys,

In this day and age where technology is constantly advancing.

Is there an alternative to the concorde that is more cost efficient/less pollution etc being produced?


E.g.

London to New York

Concorde = 3 hrs 30minutes.

normal aeroplane now = 7hr/8hrs?

It seems we have gone a huge step back.

Anyone shed any light on this, I'm intrigued..
doritos Avatar
5y, 6m agoPosted 5 years, 6 months ago
Options

All Comments

(33) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#1
Faster doesn't necessarily mean better... the new A380's are a step forward in terms of fuel efficiency which is the industry's primary concern.
#2
The Luddites were responsible for Concorde's and the Harrier's demise.
banned#3
Concorde was very expensive to travel on too
#4
lol, I think the biggest issue is the safest commerciall plane in the world is retired..............(bar new planes since then)
banned#5
Concorde made a huge loss on the developement cost with the limited sells they had, Would you spend billions building a replacement in the knowledge you'd never recoup it
#6
Alfonse
lol, I think the biggest issue is the safest commerciall plane in the world is retired..............(bar new planes since then)

I wouldn't say it was the safest at all.
#7
This :

http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/_44376374_ss2_wk2_416.jpg
#8
loulou11
Alfonse
lol, I think the biggest issue is the safest commerciall plane in the world is retired..............(bar new planes since then)


I wouldn't say it was the safest at all.


1 crash ever, if its not barring new planes since then ie A380, then what is?
banned#9
I'm often disappointed at the slow pace in which we seem to be developing in most technological areas.
banned#10
banned#11
Alfonse
loulou11
Alfonse
lol, I think the biggest issue is the safest commerciall plane in the world is retired..............(bar new planes since then)

I wouldn't say it was the safest at all.

1 crash ever, if its not barring new planes since then ie A380, then what is?

One crash because it rarely flew, bit like saying i rarely have a day off sick from work because i never work
#12
Alberto Medici, Lambrusco Bianco is a good alternative, very similar
#13
whatsThePoint
Alfonse
loulou11
Alfonse
lol, I think the biggest issue is the safest commerciall plane in the world is retired..............(bar new planes since then)


I wouldn't say it was the safest at all.


1 crash ever, if its not barring new planes since then ie A380, then what is?


One crash because it rarely flew, bit like saying i rarely have a day off sick from work because i never work


yes compared to all those other supersonic commercial flights available, compare with apples with apples

ninny
#14
pretty much guarantee you this to be one of the "safest" planes going ... lol

http://publicdomainpictures.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/u-s-air-force-ac-130h-spectre-gunship-jettisons-decoy-flares.jpg
#15
master_chief
I'm often disappointed at the slow pace in which we seem to be developing in most technological areas.


Money. Put simply Concorde cost too much and carried only 100 passengers. The engines were extremely powerful and so likely used a lot of fuel anyway.

Great plane. Limited use and numbers and costs were just too great.

To an airline carrying 100 passengers every 3 or 4 hours instead of 300+ every or 8 seems less appealling.

Didn't Concorde have limited airports it could use too?
banned#16
Alfonse
whatsThePoint
Alfonse
loulou11
Alfonse
lol, I think the biggest issue is the safest commerciall plane in the world is retired..............(bar new planes since then)

I wouldn't say it was the safest at all.

1 crash ever, if its not barring new planes since then ie A380, then what is?

One crash because it rarely flew, bit like saying i rarely have a day off sick from work because i never work

yes compared to all those other supersonic commercial flights available, compare with apples with apples

ninny

Oh so you want me to compare it with other supersonic passenger aircraft, not other subsonic ones
Umm that would be the Tupolev Tu-144 which never crashed in service, 2 did crash but thats not comparing apples with apples
#17
London Heathrow, Paris, JFK

allowed to stop in Leed/bradford on special occasions
#18
whatsThePoint
Alfonse
whatsThePoint
Alfonse
loulou11
Alfonse
lol, I think the biggest issue is the safest commerciall plane in the world is retired..............(bar new planes since then)


I wouldn't say it was the safest at all.


1 crash ever, if its not barring new planes since then ie A380, then what is?


One crash because it rarely flew, bit like saying i rarely have a day off sick from work because i never work


yes compared to all those other supersonic commercial flights available, compare with apples with apples

ninny


Oh so you want me to compare it with other supersonic passenger aircraft, not other subsonic ones
Umm that would be the Tupolev Tu-144 which never crashed in service, 2 did crash but thats not comparing apples with apples


fail
#19
Is anything in the pipeline to create a faster alternative?
1 Like #20
arcangel111
London Heathrow, Paris, JFK

allowed to stop in Leed/bradford on special occasions


to pick up Bin Laden when he wanted to travel?

:p


Edited By: numptyj on May 06, 2011 13:20
banned#21
Alfonse
whatsThePoint
Alfonse
whatsThePoint
Alfonse
loulou11
Alfonse
lol, I think the biggest issue is the safest commerciall plane in the world is retired..............(bar new planes since then)

I wouldn't say it was the safest at all.

1 crash ever, if its not barring new planes since then ie A380, then what is?

One crash because it rarely flew, bit like saying i rarely have a day off sick from work because i never work

yes compared to all those other supersonic commercial flights available, compare with apples with apples

ninny

Oh so you want me to compare it with other supersonic passenger aircraft, not other subsonic ones
Umm that would be the Tupolev Tu-144 which never crashed in service, 2 did crash but thats not comparing apples with apples

fail

Your limited reply when proven to be wrong (yet again) is getting boring, but then again if i was wrong as often as you, I expect even i would of ran out of words to say by now as well :D
#22
arcangel111
London Heathrow, Paris, JFK

allowed to stop in Leed/bradford on special occasions

What were such special occassions? ISTR hearing Concorde overhead occasionally near Leeds. Must have been around 1997/98.

Oh and Richard Branson wanted to take them on and BA refused. Wonder why!

Edited By: anewman on May 06, 2011 13:37: a
#25
The same could be said about the Tupolev Tu-144.

http://www.tupolev.ru/images/Pictures/Archive/144-68.jpg
#26
Didn't the Americans try to develop a hypersonic upper atmosphere plane that would travel from LA to Sydney in just a couple of hours. I think the idea was to accelerate into a very low orbit and then drop back to land as a glider, same as the shuttle.
I seem to recall a presentation at the Farnborough Air Show in the mid 80's.
I wonder whatever happened to that ?
#27
I seen something similar a couple of years ago. Was it not Virgin developing it ?
#28
http://www.broadlandballoons.co.uk/images/balloons/hot-air-balloon-flights-east-anglia.jpg
banned#29
master_chief
I'm often disappointed at the slow pace in which we seem to be developing in most technological areas.

I disagree:-

Concorde passenger miles per imperial gallon = 17

A380-800 passenger miles per imperial gallon = 82
#30
After seeing the Concorde and SR-71 at Duxford then reading a book on Skunkworks, it's hard not to feel a bit depressed looking at the current passenger planes particularly stepping off a particularly dumpy looking Airbus A330 after a transatlantic flight.

The problem is the general market wants economy and planes like Concorde are not only expensive to design and maintain but also difficult to fit in with noise and other regulations. An SR-71 based airliner would be rather nippy but sadly ever so slightly impractical in about a hundred different ways.

John
#31
If a wealthy person managed to buy a Concorde as a business jet, would he be allowed to use it?
#32
Civic EG6
If a wealthy person managed to buy a Concorde as a business jet, would he be allowed to use it?

Unlikely, apparently Branson tried to buy the fleet but aside from economic issues apparently the French wouldn't sign off the Concorde as air worthy. Concorde had various problems as to where it could fly due to its range and noise, I suspect the latter would be a bigger problem now as some of the Russian passenger jets are no longer allowed in European airspace due to noise.

John
#33
arcangel111
pretty much guarantee you this to be one of the "safest" planes going ... lol

With at least 12 of that type having been destroyed and over 350 of the general C-130x sharing a similar fate, I wouldn't quite say it's safe even though that's not bad for a military plane.

John

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!