Cyclist Girl Gets Revenge On Catcalling Van Drivers. - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HotUKDeals, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HotUKDeals app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

Cyclist Girl Gets Revenge On Catcalling Van Drivers.

£0.00 @
A female cyclist exacted her revenge on a cat caller in a van who pestered her at a junction by chasing after him and ripping off his wing mirror. Got a lot of time for this :) https://www.youtu… Read More
MrScotchBonnet Avatar
banned4m, 2d agoPosted 4 months, 2 days ago
A female cyclist exacted her revenge on a cat caller in a van who pestered her at a junction by chasing after him and ripping off his wing mirror.

Got a lot of time for this :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Crsugjz8RU0
MrScotchBonnet Avatar
banned4m, 2d agoPosted 4 months, 2 days ago
Options

All Comments

(31) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
2 Likes #1
Eye witness claims it was staged
1 Like #2
drasim
Eye witness claims it was staged

Probably was, most of these types of things are.
banned#3
drasim
Eye witness claims it was staged

Don't say that :(

Where?
#4
MrScotchBonnet
drasim
Eye witness claims it was staged
Don't say that :(
Where?

There's a few sources but here's an article from the Metro:
http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/22/video-of-catcalled-cyclist-getting-revenge-could-actually-be-fake-6465650/
banned#5
drasim
MrScotchBonnet
drasim
Eye witness claims it was staged
Don't say that :(
Where?
There's a few sources but here's an article from the Metro:http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/22/video-of-catcalled-cyclist-getting-revenge-could-actually-be-fake-6465650/

Meh.
3 Likes #6
Just post a link to the metro saves you time posting all these threads :D
#7
The real story though is the walking dead tshirt from Primark hows that racist and offensive.

The person complaining "if I was black" typical do gooder.
4 Likes #8
So catcalling is not ok but criminal damage is ok?

Sounds liberal to me.
#9
alanbeenthere
So catcalling is not ok but criminal damage is ok?
Sounds liberal to me.

Literally the first comment mate...

:|
1 Like #10
alanbeenthere
So catcalling is not ok but criminal damage is ok?
Sounds liberal to me.

She should be prosecuted really. She felt that their actions had deserved consequences so in reality so does hers.
#11
g8spur
alanbeenthere
So catcalling is not ok but criminal damage is ok?
Sounds liberal to me.
She should be prosecuted really. She felt that their actions had deserved consequences so in reality so does hers.
er lol? her 'consequence' was the initial provocation
she should be punished twice for existing?
how is your van?
2 Likes #12
brilly
g8spur
alanbeenthere
So catcalling is not ok but criminal damage is ok?
Sounds liberal to me.
She should be prosecuted really. She felt that their actions had deserved consequences so in reality so does hers.
er lol? her 'consequence' was the initial provocation
she should be punished twice for existing?
how is your van?

That makes no sense. So if I punch you, you can burn down my house but that's ok because I hit you first?! I really hope you aren't an adult.

It's criminal damage and she should pay for it, literally. There isn't really any other argument.
banned 1 Like #13
brilly
g8spur
alanbeenthere
So catcalling is not ok but criminal damage is ok?
Sounds liberal to me.
She should be prosecuted really. She felt that their actions had deserved consequences so in reality so does hers.
er lol? her 'consequence' was the initial provocation
she should be punished twice for existing?
how is your van?

Spurs fan :D
#14
RossD89
alanbeenthere
So catcalling is not ok but criminal damage is ok?
Sounds liberal to me.
Literally the first comment mate...:|

I didnt click the link.
It will only encourage this kind of trash.
#15
g8spur
brilly
g8spur
alanbeenthere
So catcalling is not ok but criminal damage is ok?
Sounds liberal to me.
She should be prosecuted really. She felt that their actions had deserved consequences so in reality so does hers.
er lol? her 'consequence' was the initial provocation
she should be punished twice for existing?
how is your van?
That makes no sense. So if I punch you, you can burn down my house but that's ok because I hit you first?! I really hope you aren't an adult.
It's criminal damage and she should pay for it, literally. There isn't really any other argument.
that would be slightly disproportional
your post concentrates on the evil female, had you said they were both wrong you'd have had a point but you didn't
got a mirror yet mr grown up?
#16
brilly
g8spur
brilly
g8spur
alanbeenthere
So catcalling is not ok but criminal damage is ok?
Sounds liberal to me.
She should be prosecuted really. She felt that their actions had deserved consequences so in reality so does hers.
er lol? her 'consequence' was the initial provocation
she should be punished twice for existing?
how is your van?
That makes no sense. So if I punch you, you can burn down my house but that's ok because I hit you first?! I really hope you aren't an adult.
It's criminal damage and she should pay for it, literally. There isn't really any other argument.
that would be slightly disproportional
your post concentrates on the evil female, had you said they were both wrong you'd have had a point but you didn't
got a mirror yet mr grown up?

Disproportional like criminal damage in response to verbal abuse?

I do think they are both in the wrong. Does that make you feel better?

The video only showed 1 party being punished which is why my argument was weighted against the unpunished party.

Still I wouldn't want to get in the way of you getting on your high horse so please carry on.

Edited By: g8spur on Feb 22, 2017 18:44
#17
g8spur
brilly
g8spur
brilly
g8spur
alanbeenthere
So catcalling is not ok but criminal damage is ok?
Sounds liberal to me.
She should be prosecuted really. She felt that their actions had deserved consequences so in reality so does hers.
er lol? her 'consequence' was the initial provocation
she should be punished twice for existing?
how is your van?
That makes no sense. So if I punch you, you can burn down my house but that's ok because I hit you first?! I really hope you aren't an adult.
It's criminal damage and she should pay for it, literally. There isn't really any other argument.
that would be slightly disproportional
your post concentrates on the evil female, had you said they were both wrong you'd have had a point but you didn't
got a mirror yet mr grown up?
Disproportional like criminal damage in response to verbal abuse?
I do think they are both in the wrong. Does that make you feel better?
The video only showed 1 party being punished which is why my argument was weighted against the unpunished party.
Still I wouldn't want to get in the way of you getting on your high horse so please carry on.
maybe its a lesson to not be a sleazeball, you'll know better next time you want to be a sleaze or to punch someone
#18
brilly
g8spur
brilly
g8spur
brilly
g8spur
alanbeenthere
So catcalling is not ok but criminal damage is ok?
Sounds liberal to me.
She should be prosecuted really. She felt that their actions had deserved consequences so in reality so does hers.
er lol? her 'consequence' was the initial provocation
she should be punished twice for existing?
how is your van?
That makes no sense. So if I punch you, you can burn down my house but that's ok because I hit you first?! I really hope you aren't an adult.
It's criminal damage and she should pay for it, literally. There isn't really any other argument.
that would be slightly disproportional
your post concentrates on the evil female, had you said they were both wrong you'd have had a point but you didn't
got a mirror yet mr grown up?
Disproportional like criminal damage in response to verbal abuse?
I do think they are both in the wrong. Does that make you feel better?
The video only showed 1 party being punished which is why my argument was weighted against the unpunished party.
Still I wouldn't want to get in the way of you getting on your high horse so please carry on.
maybe its a lesson to not be a sleazeball, you'll know better next time you want to be a sleaze or to punch someone

This is the strangest conversation I have ever had.
1 Like #19
FAKE, FAKE, FAKE! Was expecting someone to shout TROLLSTATION at the end!
#20
haha totally asked for it.
1 Like #21
this looks fake but if it was real fair dos from the girl that guy physically touched her he should be charged for sexual assault seems odd no one mention that.
#22
No excuse for criminal damage, the van drivers audio sounds dubbed as well.
Lock her up, throw away the keys and tampons.
1 Like #23
MynameisM
this looks fake but if it was real fair dos from the girl that guy physically touched her he should be charged for sexual assault seems odd no one mention that.

No ones mentioning it because it's nonsense. Since when did "Physically Touching" become the same thing as "Sexual Assault"? Hope I never have to ride the tube with you, you would have me in handcuffs in 5 mins flat.
#24
g8spur
MynameisM
this looks fake but if it was real fair dos from the girl that guy physically touched her he should be charged for sexual assault seems odd no one mention that.

No ones mentioning it because it's nonsense. Since when did "Physically Touching" become the same thing as "Sexual Assault"? Hope I never have to ride the tube with you, you would have me in handcuffs in 5 mins flat.


well it is if she doesn't want a random guys trying feel her up from a van. do u think it's normal behaviour to touch people on purpose for ur own gratification. we really not talking about sitting next to someone in the tube or standing next to them.
3 Likes #25
MynameisM
this looks fake but if it was real fair dos from the girl that guy physically touched her he should be charged for sexual assault seems odd no one mention that.

Oh come on, she was asking for it dressed like that.
1 Like #26
As i said on facebook, on someones post as they were asking who was in the wrong.

Sees the van pull over ans she cycles past police (or PCSOs) could have spoken to them but she didn't. She was in the wrong for criminal damage and the van passenger was in the wrong for sexual harassment and potentially sexual assault. I also added "What if the roles were reversed, would the man be making such an issue?" (that got some good comments)

If it is fake, then it doesn't change anything and both parties should be punished, even if it would be just to teach them a lesson per say.

Edited By: mac9091 on Feb 22, 2017 20:53
#27
looks like that might be error404 X)
1 Like #28
I liked how the comment after the video stated how the majority of facebook agreed with the cyclist and then proceeded to prove that by putting 4-5 comments from women... :D
#29
So is this a cutscene from the next Tombraider game.
#30
MynameisM
this looks fake but if it was real fair dos from the girl that guy physically touched her he should be charged for sexual assault seems odd no one mention that.
Sexual assault? Get a grip snowflake oO
#31
Whats wrong with just a few F words

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!