EXPIRED - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit
Expired

EXPIRED

hdizzle Avatar
7y, 3m agoPosted 7 years, 3 months ago
Scientifically a foetus is classed as what exists from the twelfth week of pregnancy onwards.

What do you guys think? Is a foetus defined as a 'person', and should have the same rights as every other human being, or should it not have those full rights as its not fully developed?
Let's keep this a clean, healthy debate, free from childish comments and abuse :)
hdizzle Avatar
7y, 3m agoPosted 7 years, 3 months ago
Options

All Comments

(18) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#1
I think you need to clarify what question you're offering for discussion.

P.S... I thought embryonic >> 9 weeks

9weeks + foetus?
#2
:lol: From Wiki:

A fetus (also spelled foetus or fœtus) is something I like to eat. The plural is fetuses.


If foetus' have rights, where do you draw the line? A zygote? A sperm?
#3
[SIZE="4"]I'm out[/SIZE]

http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh89/thesaint01/pics%20for%20forum/Imout.jpg
#4
ClarityofMind
I think you need to clarify what question you're offering for discussion.

P.S... I thought embryonic >> 9 weeks

9weeks + foetus?


Well the Q is, should a foetus be treated in the same way as human? Just because they are underdeveloped physically should that mean that they have less rights (i.e abortion). If they do have 'less rights', could one therefore assume that a 2 month old baby has less rights than a one year old, simply because the one year old is more developed?
#5
At 22 days, the foetus's heart beats with it's own blood. I'd say around then as a heart beat is a life. I think the stage they will routinely abort at is horrendous. Obviously it is a completely different matter when there are health issues and risks etc.
#6
hdizzle;6646511
Well the Q is, should a foetus be treated in the same way as human? Just because they are underdeveloped physically should that mean that they have less rights (i.e abortion). If they do have 'less rights', could one therefore assume that a 2 month old baby has less rights than a one year old, simply because the one year old is more developed?


Point is being born is not arbitrary, whereas a foetus beginning at 9/11/12 weeks absolutely is...

Banana79;6646528
At 22 days, the foetus's heart beats with it's own blood. I'd say around then as a heart beat is a life.


A heart is surely just a (fairly basic) organ - not necessarily a life. An artificial heart is absolutely possible - brain development is surely a better indication of life...
#7
hdizzle;6646511
Well the Q is, should a foetus be treated in the same way as human? Just because they are underdeveloped physically should that mean that they have less rights (i.e abortion). If they do have 'less rights', could one therefore assume that a 2 month old baby has less rights than a one year old, simply because the one year old is more developed?

when i think the latter part cant apply as post birth the baby is a separate entity.
#8
thesaint
[SIZE="4"]I'm out[/SIZE]

http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh89/thesaint01/pics%20for%20forum/Imout.jpg


[COLOR="Red"]I LOL'd.[/COLOR]
#9
I think once a baby has been concieved be it 1 day or 1 month or even longer it will still be a living person and I think that it has every right to be born and not aborted.
#10
OP, are you studying moral philosophy or similar?
#11
At what stage if assaulting a pregnant woman and the unborn baby died would that be classed as murder?
#12
DAMNOME
At what stage if assaulting a pregnant woman and the unborn baby died would that be classed as murder?


Depends on the juristiction of the crime and several other factors x

Thinking of a similar case in Florida last year... the husband was done for murder one, twice for the murder of his wife, and their unborn child as the baby was around 7 months gestation I think and already " viable" outside the womb.
#13
Life begins at conception
#14
windhoek
OP, are you studying moral philosophy or similar?


Well I study science, but I've been researching the philosophical side of things more recently.
banned#15
[FONT="Century Gothic"][SIZE="2"][COLOR="Navy"]not a lot


[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]
#16
vickywil5
I think once a baby has been concieved be it 1 day or 1 month or even longer it will still be a living person and I think that it has every right to be born and not aborted.

A plant is alive, is it against the grain if we don't water it?
#17
Lulu'sMammy
A plant is alive, is it against the grain if we don't water it?


If a plant was killed, no-one would be held accountable.

If a human was killed, someone would be held accountable.

The two cannot be compared.
#18
tinkerbell28
So, let's use that example, a mother is 20 weeks they find an advanced brain tumour, she dies or baby dies, they need to treat the tumour and operate, so who would you choose, allow the baby a few more weeks to live in the womb until viable, as they would have equal rights, in which time a fast growing tumour could be inoperable, or abort the pregnancy thus "killing" the unborn UNVIABLE child and give the mother a chance?


That's fair enough.

But what about in normal circumstances, where there is no threat to the mother's life?

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!