Gross Misconduct - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

Gross Misconduct

mcscoobs Avatar
7y, 10m agoPosted 7 years, 10 months ago
Just need some clarification here - using the following example.

Takes place in a supermarket, work clleagues working on a night shift. Incident takes place at approximately 2am, shops is closed for business and only 4/5 people are working in the building. Two workers have a row, raised voices, swearing and one worker pushes the other (as in a nudge), and thats the end of it. The other workers don't see this but can hear it.

The two workers have been suspended upon full investigation, under gross misconduct. If one of them gets the sack, should the other one too? Is this even a sackable offence?
mcscoobs Avatar
7y, 10m agoPosted 7 years, 10 months ago
Options

All Comments

(18) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#1
Yep!!!
#2
yes it is, gross misconduct
#3
any form of physical conduct can result in the sack for gross misconduct no matter how small
banned#4
It should be treated as gross misconduct but if you work where I last worked.

It would be ignored, reason I left to be honest.
#5
Your body is your own. No-one should be allowed to lay a hand on you without your permission. Even behaving in a threatening manner within personal space ( within a foot or two of your body ) is unacceptable. That's in addition to all the swearing and raised voices. They will have to investigate it fully x x
#6
How do they prove it if its one word against another? Both sacked? Both given a final warning? Both have a clean record and have been there years....
#7
mcscoobs;4544018
How do they prove it if its one word against another? Both sacked? Both given a final warning? Both have a clean record and have been there years....

The employer doesn't have to proove anything, just have belief that the employee was guilty after conducting a full investigation.
#8
As stated above, the employers would require proof of the incident such as cctv footage, otherwise it is just hearsay.

If the employee gets dismissed they would just claim unfair dismissal lol and reap in the £'s
#9
an ear witness is an eye witness though I think?
banned#10
ClarityofMind
an ear witness is an eye witness though I think?


contradiction isn't it, how can they see the punch? they could both claim they hit a wall.
#11
and if the employers have no cctv footage...? Still likely to get the boot?
#12
lumoruk
contradiction isn't it, how can they see the punch? they could both claim they hit a wall.



Good point! Although no punches were thrown in this instance....
#13
mcscoobs;4544172
and if the employers have no cctv footage...? Still likely to get the boot?


no
#14
So its all dependent on if theres cctv footage? I know that of the 2 people involved, the co-workers really don't like one of them and get on very well with the other, so that may have some positive swing to it (a good thing in this instance!)
#15
a few people on nightshift in the asda I work in have been sacked for fairly similar incidents but all are on cctv-it runs even when the store is closed-some of these have been what some might call minor scuffles but employers have to take such things very,very seriously and any laying of hands on another colleague will result in a sacking -certainly asdas way of doing things.
#16
CCTV would support it - otherwise if the 'nudge' was denied its one word against the other.

With regards to the altercation if people submit statements saying one persons language was worse than the others then that it reason to believe that he behaved worse and that could be worse.

Failing that I'd say its final written warning for use of offensive language etc.. if a employee admitted any physical contact it would be dismissal - gross misconduct
#17
Should be made to mud wrestle for their jobs imo
#18
raising their voices alone could be classed as threatening behaviour, which is reason enough to be fired for gross misconduct.

so yes they can both be fired regardless.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!