hastorresscoredforchelsea.com - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

hastorresscoredforchelsea.com

marsland95l2cr Avatar
5y, 7m agoPosted 5 years, 7 months ago
marsland95l2cr Avatar
5y, 7m agoPosted 5 years, 7 months ago
Options

All Comments

(39) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#2
LOL....
#3
Isn't as good as the 'original'
http://didthecavswinlastnight.com
#4
Saw this a few weeks ago...

The webpage has been updated since then... Theres now ads!!! oO

Same message though... :p

Edited By: tomwatts on Apr 07, 2011 15:54
#5
Posted this last night after the match!
banned 2 Likes #6
tomwatts
Saw this a few weeks ago...

The webpage has been updated since then... Bigger 'No' and now theres Ads!!! :o

Same message though... :p


I'm going to have to register http://www.havearsenalwonatrophy.com.
#7
ew, those "sponsors" links really ruin it now.

it was a lot funnier with just the "NO" before.
#8
Just thought I would "re-ignite" this thread.
#9
http://hascarrollscoredforliverpool.com/

I prefer to look on the positive side.
#10
Ha! Brilliant.
#11
mus_ne
ew, those "sponsors" links really ruin it now.

it was a lot funnier with just the "NO" before.


agreed
#12
greg_68
mus_ne
ew, those "sponsors" links really ruin it now.

it was a lot funnier with just the "NO" before.


agreed


It's awful. the dude probably got a lot hits then got greedy and thought he would start advertising ****.

Ah well, still ticks off chelsea fans.
banned#13
mus_ne
greg_68
mus_ne
ew, those "sponsors" links really ruin it now.

it was a lot funnier with just the "NO" before.


agreed


It's awful. the dude probably got a lot hits then got greedy and thought he would start advertising ****.

Ah well, still ticks off chelsea fans.


Not really. :|
banned#14
FilthAndFurry
mus_ne
greg_68
mus_ne
ew, those "sponsors" links really ruin it now.

it was a lot funnier with just the "NO" before.

agreed

It's awful. the dude probably got a lot hits then got greedy and thought he would start advertising ****.

Ah well, still ticks off chelsea fans.

Not really. :|

well you did bite.
banned#15
master_chief
FilthAndFurry
mus_ne
greg_68
mus_ne
ew, those "sponsors" links really ruin it now.

it was a lot funnier with just the "NO" before.


agreed


It's awful. the dude probably got a lot hits then got greedy and thought he would start advertising ****.

Ah well, still ticks off chelsea fans.


Not really. :|


well you did bite.


Pointing out that 'Chelsea fans' aren't ticked off by this isn't exactly a decent 'bite'.

In fact we really aren't taking this season seriously. Why else would we play Kalou or Ferreira?
banned#16
how many minutes is he up to now without a goal, or even more than one shot on target lol?
#17
csiman
how many minutes is he up to now without a goal, or even more than one shot on target lol?


Lmao. Chelsea fans pretend they're so not bothered about it.

Fun times :') hahaha :')

Edited By: mus_ne on Apr 13, 2011 14:01
#18
11 games now and tbf he never even looked like either scoring or over exerting himself last night, £50 million is embarrassing and he should be ashamed of his performances so far. I also find it hilarious at the Chelsea fans who are claiming not to be too bothered, if he had signed fo rany other club and performed in the same way they'd be crowing from the rooftops.
I still have my doubts as to who wanted him, who bought him and whether he himself wants to be there.
#19
FilthAndFurry
master_chief
FilthAndFurry
mus_ne
greg_68
mus_ne
ew, those "sponsors" links really ruin it now.

it was a lot funnier with just the "NO" before.


agreed


It's awful. the dude probably got a lot hits then got greedy and thought he would start advertising ****.

Ah well, still ticks off chelsea fans.


Not really. :|


well you did bite.


Pointing out that 'Chelsea fans' aren't ticked off by this isn't exactly a decent 'bite'.

In fact we really aren't taking this season seriously. Why else would we play Kalou or Ferreira?

Not seriously?! £50 milion on Torres............ no your not, are you! :p
banned#20
greg_68
11 games now and tbf he never even looked like either scoring or over exerting himself last night, £50 million is embarrassing and he should be ashamed of his performances so far. I also find it hilarious at the Chelsea fans who are claiming not to be too bothered, if he had signed fo rany other club and performed in the same way they'd be crowing from the rooftops.
I still have my doubts as to who wanted him, who bought him and whether he himself wants to be there.

11 games wtf!

so he is close to breaking the 1000 minutes barrier - LMAO

he was so obviously only there for the dosh. So he's been paid over a £1000000 for sweet FA, if not making them lose more games if anything!
#21
£7.5 million for Forlan doesn't really compare to £50 miilion though does it?
#22
thegroutch
greg_68
£7.5 million for Forlan doesn't really compare to £50 miilion though does it?


it was a fair whack 9 years ago


It's not quite comparable but ain't far off.
As a Liverpool fan I think he needs a rest and to get a few players behind him who we enable him to play of there shoulder.
He will come good but I feel sorry for Drogba more then anyone, been a loyal servant to Chelsea FC for a long while.
banned 2 Likes #23
thegroutch
remind you of anyone?

http://www.laligaticketsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Diego-Forlan-001.jpg

More like
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00794/andriy_shevchenko12_794449c.jpg
#24
thegroutch
remind you of anyone?

http://www.laligaticketsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Diego-Forlan-001.jpg


We (Man Utd) got him too early in his career imo. If he came when he was in his mid-late 20s he would have been a United legend.
#25
dtovey89
thegroutch
remind you of anyone?

http://www.laligaticketsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Diego-Forlan-001.jpg


We (Man Utd) got him too early in his career imo. If he came when he was in his mid-late 20s he would have been a United legend.


Have to agree with that now. Still talk of him coming to the premiership some how, loads saying LFC, but that was bull.
#26
Adam2050
dtovey89
thegroutch
remind you of anyone?

http://www.laligaticketsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Diego-Forlan-001.jpg


We (Man Utd) got him too early in his career imo. If he came when he was in his mid-late 20s he would have been a United legend.


Have to agree with that now. Still talk of him coming to the premiership some how, loads saying LFC, but that was bull.


Even in his 30s he tore up the latest World Cup - won player of the tournament didn't he?
I could imagine him playing for either Spurs or Liverpool but would still like him at United for a few seasons.
#27
dtovey89
Adam2050
dtovey89
thegroutch
remind you of anyone?

http://www.laligaticketsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Diego-Forlan-001.jpg


We (Man Utd) got him too early in his career imo. If he came when he was in his mid-late 20s he would have been a United legend.


Have to agree with that now. Still talk of him coming to the premiership some how, loads saying LFC, but that was bull.


Even in his 30s he tore up the latest World Cup - won player of the tournament didn't he?
I could imagine him playing for either Spurs or Liverpool but would still like him at United for a few seasons.


Think Harry will likely go in for him this summer. Think there was talk of him trying last and his playing partner Mr bobby Agro.
#28
From what I have seen of him this year he is well past his prime. The likes of Spurs and Liverpool do not want to go down the road of signing players like him these days, they should be aimimg for players of higher quality and longevity than that.

Edited By: greg_68 on Apr 13, 2011 15:05
#29
greg_68
From what I have seen of him this year he is well past his prime. The likes of Spurs and Liverpool do not want to go down the road of signing players like him these days, they should be aimimg for players of higher quality and longevity than that.


I beg to differ. There are still some energy in some of the older players.
Why not get them on a free/dirt cheap to add an instant impact and experience to the team. IF Wenger had done this with a few centre backs and keeper (not Lehman) then they would have won at least one trophy this season.
banned#30
greg_68
11 games now and tbf he never even looked like either scoring or over exerting himself last night, £50 million is embarrassing and he should be ashamed of his performances so far. I also find it hilarious at the Chelsea fans who are claiming not to be too bothered, if he had signed fo rany other club and performed in the same way they'd be crowing from the rooftops.
I still have my doubts as to who wanted him, who bought him and whether he himself wants to be there.


The reason Chelsea fans aren't that bothered about it is because it's not simply an issue of him not playing well. He's making the right runs and getting in the right positions, but he's been unlucky and Carlo has got the tactics wrong.

Last night was absurd. He's not the type of player you can leave 20 yards from the nearest player and pump balls up to. Malouda shouldn't be in the team at the moment and as much as it pains me to say it, neither should Lampard.
#31
FilthAndFurry
greg_68
11 games now and tbf he never even looked like either scoring or over exerting himself last night, £50 million is embarrassing and he should be ashamed of his performances so far. I also find it hilarious at the Chelsea fans who are claiming not to be too bothered, if he had signed fo rany other club and performed in the same way they'd be crowing from the rooftops.
I still have my doubts as to who wanted him, who bought him and whether he himself wants to be there.


The reason Chelsea fans aren't that bothered about it is because it's not simply an issue of him not playing well. He's making the right runs and getting in the right positions, but he's been unlucky and Carlo has got the tactics wrong.

Last night was absurd. He's not the type of player you can leave 20 yards from the nearest player and pump balls up to. Malouda shouldn't be in the team at the moment and as much as it pains me to say it, neither should Lampard.


Woy Hodgson tried the same tactics with him on a lot of occasions and found this out.
#32
as a liverpool fan, I can say that these two were a fail:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_nukPK9PiB2E/TBjcST5Dq8I/AAAAAAAAECE/py8mkCLKrUA/s1600/morientes-liverpool.jpg

And:

http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00497/Peter_Crouch_497582a.jpg

But for £50 million. LMAO.
#33
mus_ne


But for £50 million. LMAO.


Luis Garcia was probably the last decent striker you had (other than Torres when he was on form)
#34
dtovey89
mus_ne


But for £50 million. LMAO.


Luis Garcia was probably the last decent striker you had (other than Torres when he was on form)


Lol. ok :)
#35
Crouch came at the wrong time as did a certain Anelka.
#36
Adam2050
Crouch came at the wrong time as did a certain Anelka.


You've had a quite a few come at the wrong time, do you think it may been the right time but the wrong club?



Edited By: greg_68 on Apr 13, 2011 15:55
banned#37
OP you're just being cruel. This one is better.

www.35yearswithoutatrophy.co.uk
#38
mus_ne
dtovey89
mus_ne


But for £50 million. LMAO.


Luis Garcia was probably the last decent striker you had (other than Torres when he was on form)


Lol. ok :)


Who else was there lol?
#39
Here I am, re-igniting this thread.

http://swns.com/fernando-torres-no-website-goes-viral-141126.html

It's gone viral;)

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!