Two police officers stopped a teenage photographer from taking pictures of an Armed Forces Day parade - and then claimed they did not need a law to detain him.
The audio recording begins minutes later with an officer initially arguing that it is illegal to take photographs of children. He then claims that it is illegal to take images of army members and police officers.
Under laws that guarantee the freedom of press in Britain, there is no restriction on photography of children, police or armed forces in a public space. There is new legislation to protect the identities of some police officers but only those working undercover or in instances where an officer genuinely believes a photographer is collecting data for terrorist purposes.
In the audio recording, when asked by Mr Mattsson what law police were using to detain him and ask for details, one officer replies: We dont have to have a law.
The 16-year-old continues to argue his case, informing the officers that he has a right to photograph in public places and asks whether he can get back to work.
Instead he is told by a second officer that he is now considered a threat under the Terrorism Act and escorted away from the parade. Mr Mattsson claims he was then pushed down a set of four concrete stairs and detained until the parade passed.http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/officers-claim-they-dont-need-law-to-stop-photographer-taking-pictures-2012827.html
Yet another case, of after not being able to find a relevant law, falling back onto abuse of the Terrorism Act.