Lloyds wins second Bank charges case - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

Lloyds wins second Bank charges case

edi Avatar
9y, 6m agoPosted 9 years, 6 months ago
Lloyds TSB has won a second county court case against a customer trying to reclaim overdraft charges. :-(

A case was dismissed by a judge at Lancaster county court on 11 May, four days before a ruling in Birmingham against a claim from Kevin Berwick. A builder from Lancaster, Julian Rudd, had tried to recoup £3,000 in overdraft charges and interest.
Lloyds TSB did not turn up to argue its case, but the judge decided Mr Rudd had failed to state an adequate claim.

Judge Forrester, who heard the case, said: "It is ordered that the particulars of claim are struck out as disclosing no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim set out as a coherent set of facts, which if true, disclose a legally recognisable claim against the defendant."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6692559.stmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6692559.stm
Other Links From Case:
edi Avatar
9y, 6m agoPosted 9 years, 6 months ago
Options

All Comments

(2) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#1
On a positive note, a mate has just claimed 2k back from Natwest without any hastle....
#2
edi
Lloyds TSB has won a second county court case against a customer trying to reclaim overdraft charges. :-(

A case was dismissed by a judge at Lancaster county court on 11 May, four days before a ruling in Birmingham against a claim from Kevin Berwick. A builder from Lancaster, Julian Rudd, had tried to recoup £3,000 in overdraft charges and interest.
Lloyds TSB did not turn up to argue its case, but the judge decided Mr Rudd had failed to state an adequate claim.

Judge Forrester, who heard the case, said: "It is ordered that the particulars of claim are struck out as disclosing no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim set out as a coherent set of facts, which if true, disclose a legally recognisable claim against the defendant."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6692559.stm


Bank apology for charges letter

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6692919.stm

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!