About HotUKDeals
HUKD is a community for deal seekers. Find and share the best deals, promotional codes and vouchers from on and off the web.
HotUKDeals Stats
Now Online
:
6426
(5611 Guests / 815 Members ) Record Users : 49023Total Members : 798735Member Activity : 1286800 Threads , 14974382 Posts
(5611 Guests / 815 Members ) Record Users : 49023Total Members : 798735Member Activity : 1286800 Threads , 14974382 Posts
HUKD Tools and API
Copyright 2013. All rights reserved.
All Comments (134)
Jump to unread Post a Commenta) Mr Evra pushed the Chelsea head groundsman with his chest (as was admitted by Mr Evra)
b) He struck Mr Sam Bethell, a groundsman at Chelsea, on the side of his head
c) He subsequently, ie after the previous incident had begun to calm down, ran back to confront Mr Bethell again (as was also admitted by Mr Evra)
d) Then became involved in a further physical altercation with Mr Bethell.
The Commission considered this was an incident of violent behaviour by Mr Evra which was therefore punished by a suspension for four first team matches as from Monday, December 22 and imposed a fine of £15,000 on Mr Evra.
The Regulatory Commission found two charges against Chelsea both proved. On the first charge the Commission found that during the course of the same incidents connected with the warm-down by Manchester United players, Chelsea employee Mr Sam Bethell, had conducted himself in a disorderly fashion and that his conduct and language had been abusive and provocative.
Charges against Mr Bethell had previously been dismissed on the ground that the FA had no jurisdiction over him personally. Chelsea were charged because they failed in their responsibility to ensure that their employee Mr Bethell conducted himself in an orderly fashion and refrained from abusive and provocative conduct and language. The commission fined Chelsea £25,000 on this charge.
An allegation that Mr Bethell had engaged in racist conduct or language was not proved. Accordingly, so far as the charge against Chelsea was based on its alleged responsibility for such racist conduct and language by Mr Bethell, the charge against the club was not proved.
A second charge against Chelsea of failure to specify in Mr Bethell's contract of employment by the club that Mr Bethell was directly under the disciplinary control of the FA was upheld but the commission did not find it appropriate to impose any penalty on that charge.
Mr Evra and Chelsea were each ordered to pay half the costs of the regulatory commission proceedings."
It wasn't proved, Doesn't mean it didn't happen.
The boy that cried wolf springs to mind. He's accused Finnan in the past too. Personally I think he has a chip on his shoulder, had tantrums in the past. So if Suarez is found not guilty do you think Evra should be punished (very much doubt so). Could be touted as a smeer campaign to me.
Going to be interesting what the Chelsea fans yell on Sunday, 'Your racist Suarez, what a mo, so is John by media standards.'
a) Mr Evra pushed the Chelsea head groundsman with his chest (as was admitted by Mr Evra)
b) He struck Mr Sam Bethell, a groundsman at Chelsea, on the side of his head
c) He subsequently, ie after the previous incident had begun to calm down, ran back to confront Mr Bethell again (as was also admitted by Mr Evra)
d) Then became involved in a further physical altercation with Mr Bethell.
The Commission considered this was an incident of violent behaviour by Mr Evra which was therefore punished by a suspension for four first team matches as from Monday, December 22 and imposed a fine of £15,000 on Mr Evra.
The Regulatory Commission found two charges against Chelsea both proved. On the first charge the Commission found that during the course of the same incidents connected with the warm-down by Manchester United players, Chelsea employee Mr Sam Bethell, had conducted himself in a disorderly fashion and that his conduct and language had been abusive and provocative.
Charges against Mr Bethell had previously been dismissed on the ground that the FA had no jurisdiction over him personally. Chelsea were charged because they failed in their responsibility to ensure that their employee Mr Bethell conducted himself in an orderly fashion and refrained from abusive and provocative conduct and language. The commission fined Chelsea £25,000 on this charge.
An allegation that Mr Bethell had engaged in racist conduct or language was not proved. Accordingly, so far as the charge against Chelsea was based on its alleged responsibility for such racist conduct and language by Mr Bethell, the charge against the club was not proved.
A second charge against Chelsea of failure to specify in Mr Bethell's contract of employment by the club that Mr Bethell was directly under the disciplinary control of the FA was upheld but the commission did not find it appropriate to impose any penalty on that charge.
Mr Evra and Chelsea were each ordered to pay half the costs of the regulatory commission proceedings."
It wasn't proved, Doesn't mean it didn't happen.
The boy that cried wolf springs to mind. He's accused Finnan in the past too. Personally I think he has a chip on his shoulder, had tantrums in the past. So if Suarez is found not guilty do you think Evra should be punished (very much doubt so). Could be touted as a smeer campaign to me.
Going to be interesting what the Chelsea fans yell on Sunday, 'Your racist Suarez, what a mo, so is John by media standards.'
Yes if he was innocent, However that would be harder to prove.
a) Mr Evra pushed the Chelsea head groundsman with his chest (as was admitted by Mr Evra)
b) He struck Mr Sam Bethell, a groundsman at Chelsea, on the side of his head
c) He subsequently, ie after the previous incident had begun to calm down, ran back to confront Mr Bethell again (as was also admitted by Mr Evra)
d) Then became involved in a further physical altercation with Mr Bethell.
The Commission considered this was an incident of violent behaviour by Mr Evra which was therefore punished by a suspension for four first team matches as from Monday, December 22 and imposed a fine of £15,000 on Mr Evra.
The Regulatory Commission found two charges against Chelsea both proved. On the first charge the Commission found that during the course of the same incidents connected with the warm-down by Manchester United players, Chelsea employee Mr Sam Bethell, had conducted himself in a disorderly fashion and that his conduct and language had been abusive and provocative.
Charges against Mr Bethell had previously been dismissed on the ground that the FA had no jurisdiction over him personally. Chelsea were charged because they failed in their responsibility to ensure that their employee Mr Bethell conducted himself in an orderly fashion and refrained from abusive and provocative conduct and language. The commission fined Chelsea £25,000 on this charge.
An allegation that Mr Bethell had engaged in racist conduct or language was not proved. Accordingly, so far as the charge against Chelsea was based on its alleged responsibility for such racist conduct and language by Mr Bethell, the charge against the club was not proved.
A second charge against Chelsea of failure to specify in Mr Bethell's contract of employment by the club that Mr Bethell was directly under the disciplinary control of the FA was upheld but the commission did not find it appropriate to impose any penalty on that charge.
Mr Evra and Chelsea were each ordered to pay half the costs of the regulatory commission proceedings."
It wasn't proved, Doesn't mean it didn't happen.
The boy that cried wolf springs to mind. He's accused Finnan in the past too. Personally I think he has a chip on his shoulder, had tantrums in the past. So if Suarez is found not guilty do you think Evra should be punished (very much doubt so). Could be touted as a smeer campaign to me.
Going to be interesting what the Chelsea fans yell on Sunday, 'Your racist Suarez, what a mo, so is John by media standards.'
The F.A don't charge people for no reason, much the same way people don't end up in court for no grounds of suspicion.
Stop spreading lies.
Stop spreading lies.
This is 100% correct.
Adam2050 - It would do you no harm to read this article that I posted a few pages back in this thread, before you start accusing Evra in the wrong.
Edited By: modoc on Nov 16, 2011 20:32
Stop spreading lies.
yep, correct
Your outnumbered
No, no he didn't.
Take a hint. Get your facts right.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2006/mar/07/newsstory.sport5
Whether or not he 'claimed' racial abuse is regardless, he's obviously a victim of mistaken identity. It just didn't come from nothing, someone didnt decide to side with him because he heard it off the crowd, Evra must of said something is what I'm getting at.
Edited By: Adam2050 on Nov 16, 2011 21:12: .
We will get to the facts soon I'm sure.
edit: because racism is a serious issue I'm not going to string this out. A deaf supporter in the crowd lip read steve finnan and reported what he believed was a racist remark. Patrice Evra stated that he did not hear it.
Edited By: brett1985 on Nov 16, 2011 21:15
We will get to the facts soon I'm sure.
edit: because racism is a serious issue I'm not going to string this out. A deaf supporter in the crowd lip read steve finnan and reported what he believed was a racist remark. Patrice Evra stated that he did not hear it.
Hmm seems you are right on this, miss read articles and miss interrupted quotes do not help. I stand corrected.
Credit where its due.
exacaly the same here, however i just can't see it myself
Sepp Blatter has been around since before the slave trade..!!
Sepp Blatter has been around since before the slave trade..!!
Well his latest comment will hopefully see the end of his reign. Nasty lying piece of crap.
The guy is a joke, how is he still in his job?!..