Mods going mad ?!?! - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HotUKDeals, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HotUKDeals app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit
Expired

Mods going mad ?!?!

£0.00 @
Seems a bit strange to resurrect a this thread to lock it now ??? http://www.hotukdeals.com/item/1824/for-sale-itv-on-digital-freeview-di/ I can't see that they'll be looking to re-list within 7…
emi Avatar
7y, 10m agoPosted 7 years, 10 months ago
Seems a bit strange to resurrect a this thread to lock it now ???

http://www.hotukdeals.com/item/1824/for-sale-itv-on-digital-freeview-di/

I can't see that they'll be looking to re-list within 7 days, seeing as it's 4 1/2 years since they last listed them !!
Tags:
emi Avatar
7y, 10m agoPosted 7 years, 10 months ago
Options

All Comments

(28) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
banned#2
it's aScottishBloke. You'll get used to him...
#3
hes selling three of them yourt only allowed to sell 2
banned#4
shosie
hes selling three of them yourt only allowed to sell 2


yes but 4 and a half years ago,..who'd have noticed?!
#5
shosie
hes selling three of them yourt only allowed to sell 2


But 4 1/2 years ago the rules might have been different :whistling:
#6
haha does seem funny
#7
H_K
yes but 4 and a half years ago,..who'd have noticed?!


dunno cant say ive clicked that far back
#8
I don't think the no more than 2 of the same item rule existed then so punishments are now being applied retrospectively.
#9
RedIron
I don't think the no more than 2 of the same item rule existed then so punishments are now being applied retrospectively.


Just seems a bit silly if rules weren't being broken back then. Even so, according to the seller the boxes were different makes (Philips, Nokia etc) so not really the same items.
#10
Damn I now need to wait a further 7 days before I can makemy interest known in the guys 4 year old listing. gutted.
#11
RedIron
I don't think the no more than 2 of the same item rule existed then so punishments are now being applied retrospectively.


surely if it was posted if that rule idnt exist then he wasnt breaking the rules then. ie if 16 year olds were buying ciggarettes before the smoking age went up it was legal then but the day after it was illegal sme with smoking in doors, one day nothing the day you get a fine
#12
emi;5260370
Just seems a bit silly if rules weren't being broken back then. Even so, according to the seller the boxes were different makes (Philips, Nokia etc) so not really the same items.


I think they'd be classed as similar items so it would be breaking the rules now but that rule didn't exist then.

I've seen threads being closed for dodgy reasons now (selling promo games for instance) but bumping a thread which is 4 years old is taking the p**s a bit. I wonder if the OP got an infraction.
banned 1 Like #13
Oh No..............................

I acted upon a report from a member and applied the current set of rules. My eyesite is not what it used to be. I'm trying to keep FS/FT flowing smoothly, however some may believe I've gone too far. It's a genuine mistake on my part

I owe an apology to the OP, however.
:oops:
#14
I bet the OP is worried sick on how he's gonna sell them now ....
#15
aScottishBloke;5260441
Oh No..............................

I acted upon a report from a member and applied the current set of rules. My eyesite is not what it used to be. I'm trying to keep FS/FT flowing smoothly, however some may believe I've gone too far. It's a genuine mistake on my part

I owe an apology to the OP, however.
:oops:


Name names, who reported it then :whistling:
banned#16
aScottishBloke
Oh No..............................

I acted upon a report from a member and applied the current set of rules. My eyesite is not what it used to be. I'm trying to keep FS/FT flowing smoothly, however some may believe I've gone too far. It's a genuine mistake on my part

I owe an apology to the OP, however.
:oops:


looking into things b4 infracting and warning people might help you are way way to trigger happy IMO
#17
fragaliciousbob
looking into things b4 infracting and warning people might help you are way way to trigger happy IMO


fight fight!
#18
aScottishBloke
Oh No..............................

I acted upon a report from a member and applied the current set of rules. My eyesite is not what it used to be. I'm trying to keep FS/FT flowing smoothly, however some may believe I've gone too far. It's a genuine mistake on my part

I owe an apology to the OP, however.
:oops:



I reported this not looking at the date. Not aScottishBlokes fault at all, it was bumped forward I saw that the OP was selling well over what was allowed.

Strange, I have been seeing a lot of bumped threads of late.

They can remove incorrect infractions.
banned#19
Adam2050
I reported this not looking at the date. Not aScottishBlokes fault at all, it was bumped forward I saw that the OP was selling well over what was allowed.

Strange, I have been seeing a lot of bumped threads of late.

They can remove incorrect infractions.


It had not been bumped until the mod locked it. You do know you're not a mod don't you, cos you seem rather trigger happy also on this forum.
#20
Adam2050
I reported this not looking at the date. Not aScottishBlokes fault at all, it was bumped forward I saw that the OP was

Strange, I have been seeing a lot of bumped threads of late.

They can remove incorrect infractions.


That thread hasn't had a comment in it for over 4 years, not quite sure how it was bumped... And the OP was "selling well over what was allowed." ?? He was selling 3 ffs.

:roll:

MOD WANNABE ALERT! lol
#21
ChipSticks
That thread hasn't had a comment in it for over 4 years, not quite sure how it was bumped... And the OP was "selling well over what was allowed." ?? He was selling 3 ffs.

:roll:

MOD WANNABE ALERT! lol


People post, delete the post when they realise its been over 4 years since the post?:roll:

Quick to jump on the bandwagon.

Your allowed to sell 2 per 3 month period.

Makes me a mod wannabe if I report a post. Not really if you got any mature comments please oblige. Think you will find other people report threads.
banned#22
RedIron
I don't think the no more than 2 of the same item rule existed then so punishments are now being applied retrospectively.


Some people have databases to check - and like to feel important when they manage to highlight something and get another member suspended.:whistling:
banned#23
aScottishBloke
Oh No..............................

I acted upon a report from a member and applied the current set of rules. My eyesite is not what it used to be. I'm trying to keep FS/FT flowing smoothly, however some may believe I've gone too far. It's a genuine mistake on my part

I owe an apology to the OP, however.
:oops:


Fair play. :thumbsup:
#24
Adam2050
People post, delete the post when they realise its been over 4 years since the post?:roll:

Quick to jump on the bandwagon.

Your allowed to sell 2 per 3 month period.

Makes me a mod wannabe if I report a post. Not really if you got any mature comments please oblige. Think you will find other people report threads.


Yes sir!!


Mod School thata way >>>>>>

:-D
#25
H_K;5260956
It had not been bumped until the mod locked it. You do know you're not a mod don't you, cos you seem rather trigger happy also on this forum.


If a newbie posts a link or similar, this will show on the forum page and bump it to the top, but the post will not show in thread. Same goes for someone deleting their post from a thread, it will remain at the top due to the server not being able to get rid of it quickly enough.

Just because you didn't see the post doesn't mean there wasn't one.
#26
The guy is just doing his job. people complain when mods don't and again when they do lol. And i can imagine the reports on this forum roll in thick and fast, not too mention countless pm's!! (sorry ascottishbloke, i'll cut my questions down)
:p
#27
That was my thread and I was some what surprised when I received a pm to say I'd received a warning. Anyway pointed out to the mod that the thread was over 5 years old and the warning was removed. We all make mistakes I guess, made me chuckle though !!
#28
adam787_1
That was my thread and I was some what surprised when I received a pm to say I'd received a warning. Anyway pointed out to the mod that the thread was over 5 years old and the warning was removed. We all make mistakes I guess, made me chuckle though !!


Have you still got the boxes??? ...... LOL :thumbsup:

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Looking for Twitter login?
Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!