Only a matter of time before john venables identity is revealed - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit
Expired

Only a matter of time before john venables identity is revealed

barky Avatar
6y, 10m agoPosted 6 years, 10 months ago
The government have blocked the sun from printing details of his offence which got him returned to jail. Yes,I know its the sun but getting a high court injunction suggests that this time its actually true.

He has supposedly commited a serious sexual offence and was working as a bouncer.

He will have to get a court trial for this offence wont he? So only a matter of time before the cats out of the bag methinks.
barky Avatar
6y, 10m agoPosted 6 years, 10 months ago
Options

All Comments

(77) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
Page:
#1
There is a complete worldwide injunction against naming him, which includes the internet, so threads like this won't last long thankfully.
#2
i hope his identity is revealed i dont think this scum bag has the right to be protected not after what he has done to james.
#3
This just reminds me of Maxine Carr who was also given a new identity - a new protected life - and its sickening.

btw Barky, she lives in East Kilbride - fact.
#4
his name is MR SMITH
#5
greyparrot
i hope his identity is revealed i dont think this scum bag has the right to be protected not after what he has done to james.


agree:thumbsup:
banned#6
thesaint
There is a complete worldwide injunction against naming him, which includes the internet, so threads like this won't last long thankfully.


I hope you're not suggesting you have spammed this thread or trying to get others to do so? Tut tut.
#7
thesaint
There is a complete worldwide injunction against naming him, which includes the internet, so threads like this won't last long thankfully.


is that even possible?
what court has the authority to make a worldwide injunction?
#8
He will be named before the month is out imo,the publicity for the newspaper would far outweigh any possible punishment by the courts


the stain is talking poop as usual
#9
thesaint
There is a complete worldwide injunction against naming him, which includes the internet, so threads like this won't last long thankfully.


I think though that anywhere else can publish details just not the UK. Even scotland can I believe
#10
thesaint
There is a complete worldwide injunction against naming him, which includes the internet, so threads like this won't last long thankfully.


really? well they better close down the bbc at the same time they deal with this thread then cos its all been discussed on bbc news this morning. how exactly does the british justice system enforce a "worldwide injunction"anyways? I can just imagine other countries are queuing up to be told what to do by a judge in the high court.
banned#11
wolf359
is that even possible?
what court has the authority to make a worldwide injunction?


They don't. He's deluded.
#12
wolf359
is that even possible?
what court has the authority to make a worldwide injunction?


my point exactly-its impossible-the SECOND someone gets his name it will be all over the internet
#13
i've googled it. apparently there is a worldwide injuction (and its not the first) although how on earth a british court could force say a chinese website for instance, not to publish the information is beyond me. i think its un-enforcable
#14
I have been following this story and was wondering why something hasnt been posted before. On facebook there are a few sites up regarding this and some off the coments are not worth reading!

I remember some years ago the News off the World published a story about where one off the two was living, I was once told that the other lives in the South West, possibly Torbay.

Tragic what happened. Now I have kids myself it makes you think even more about things like this!
#15
Guys, keep tabs on Wikileaks. If the truth leaks, it'll be there.
#16
think its disgusting that jamie bulgers own mum is not entitled to be given information like other victims - where the parole board have a duty to inform you if anything happens

stop protecting the criminals and protect the victims - they havent in this case as stated he has committed another serious offence
#17
If the Sun has it, surely the Scottish Sun are allowed to print it?

Isnt there a rule up here allowing Scottish Newspapers to reveal identities? I vaguely remember a story a few years back regarding Jack Straws son.
#18
hes probs a member on here loooool
banned#19
wolf359
i think its un-enforcable


This ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

When China tells the UK not to report incidents like Tiananmen Square, we always comply!:w00t:
#20
I heard he actually stabbed someone, hence why he was back in jail.
#21
wolf359
i've googled it. apparently there is a worldwide injuction (and its not the first) although how on earth a british court could force say a chinese website for instance, not to publish the information is beyond me. i think its un-enforcable


that would be correct, its more of a recommendation not to do it (please) and especially diplomatic countries should comply.
banned#22
wolf359
i've googled it. apparently there is a worldwide injuction (and its not the first) although how on earth a british court could force say a chinese website for instance, not to publish the information is beyond me. i think its un-enforcable


well its been enforced for 9 years
banned#23
sassie
well its been enforced for 9 years


Not in the slightest. There is a huge difference between reporting information and not knowing information. The fact Venables has been in the public and presumably committed another crime, I would imagine people are now aware of his new identity. Just a matter of time before that's revealed IMHO.
banned#24
guv
Not in the slightest. There is a huge difference between reporting information and not knowing information. The fact Venables has been in the public and presumably committed another crime, I would imagine people are now aware of his new identity. Just a matter of time before that's revealed IMHO.


you saying you believe the papers have never known who/where they are, you saying that every person that has come into contact with them have never known who they are? behave their pics where plastered all over the world when they where 10, they hadnt been locked in a room from the age of 10 till their release
banned#25
Of course it will leak on the internet, these things always do these days. It was like when Harry was sent off to fight in the Army, that was supposed to be under a media blackout and it popped up on an Australian website

Same with the John Terry story recently, everyone KNEW who it was but couldn't actually say yet it was all over the interwebs
banned#26
It probably will, and some vigilante will probably end up trying to kill him.

And then hopefully that person will be sent to prison and we have one less idiot roaming the streets.
#27
FilthAndFurry
It probably will, and some vigilante will probably end up trying to kill him.

And then hopefully that person will be sent to prison and we have one less idiot roaming the streets.


or Trolling on internet forums :whistling:
banned#28
bassman_uk
or Trolling on internet forums :whistling:


But who will post the Daily Mail stories and support the BNP when he's gone?:thumbsup:
banned#29
thesaint
There is a complete worldwide injunction against naming him, which includes the internet, so threads like this won't last long thankfully.


Where does this thread name him? Or is there another reason why it should be removed?
#30
colinsunderland
Where does this thread name him? Or is there another reason why it should be removed?


The thread doesn't name him. I was the first person to reply.

What it will do is lead to wild speculation of what he has done, what his new name is, where he's living, threats of violence etc etc.
There are many unintelligent people that will believe the rumours and conjecture and end up getting themselves in hot water, and possibly this website.
banned#31
holly100
think its disgusting that jamie bulgers own mum is not entitled to be given information like other victims - where the parole board have a duty to inform you if anything happens

stop protecting the criminals and protect the victims - they havent in this case as stated he has committed another serious offence


You only have to read some of the comments on here to see that he clearly needs protecting.
#32
sassie
you saying you believe the papers have never known who/where they are, you saying that every person that has come into contact with them have never known who they are? behave their pics where plastered all over the world when they where 10, they hadnt been locked in a room from the age of 10 till their release


the papers won't print it because of the injunction, but the injunction won't prevent foreign papers or websites from releasing the information and once its in the public domain the papers are fre to print the story.
banned#33
wolf359
the papers won't print it because of the injunction, but the injunction won't prevent foreign papers or websites from releasing the information and once its in the public domain the papers are fre to print the story.


i know that, but guv was inferring that nothing had ever been released because nobody knew anything rather than the injunction stopping them
#34
at first i believe he should have his identity private because" he did his time" and moved on
however since he has commited a crime he should lose his right to privacy
#35
jasonrat

however since he has commited a crime


Link?
banned#36
jasonrat
at first i believe he should have his identity private because" he did his time" and moved on
however since he has commited a crime he should lose his right to privacy


nobody knows anything at the moment
#37
sassie
nobody knows anything at the moment


ok sorry because of "extremely serious allegations"
banned#38
thesaint
The thread doesn't name him. I was the first person to reply.

What it will do is lead to wild speculation of what he has done, what his new name is, where he's living, threats of violence etc etc.
There are many unintelligent people that will believe the rumours and conjecture and end up getting themselves in hot water, and possibly this website.


Wht not just post some pics of burning torches and pitch forks like normal? Or better still, just stick to beg repping and "congrats on 100 posts" replies.

sassie
i know that, but guv was inferring that nothing had ever been released because nobody knew anything rather than the injunction stopping them


Erm. No I didn't. I suggested that a "world wide injunction" was BS. True, the US managed to gag Al-Jazeera in Baghdad by bombing the building, but in general terms, the UK can control the media inside its borders, but not outside and it certainly can't control the internet.

thesaint
Link?


I refer you to your first post above. He is back in prison. The home office have said he has been arrested for (allegedly) committing a serious offence. Read the news instead of relying on an internet shopping forum.
banned#39
sassie
well its been enforced for 9 years


guv
Not in the slightest. There is a huge difference between reporting information and not knowing information. The fact Venables has been in the public and presumably committed another crime, I would imagine people are now aware of his new identity. Just a matter of time before that's revealed IMHO.


guv




Erm. No I didn't. I suggested that a "world wide injunction" was BS. True, the US managed to gag Al-Jazeera in Baghdad by bombing the building, but in general terms, the UK can control the media inside its borders, but not outside and it certainly can't control the internet.

.


im sorry, but thats what it looked like to me
#40
thank god for torch burners......any decent deals around?

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!