Looking into getting Photography back as a hobby. Used to do alot of portrait and landscape, though kinda lost interest over the years.
Probably looking for a Canon entry level D-slr. The thing is, I've seen older 400/450 body going for less than a halve fo the new 550D. Part of me do want the latest, and greatest - full HD video, 18mp high ISO performance sensor, etc.
Though when push comes to shove, is the difference in the image quality, enough to justify twice the price? It's the artist, not the gears, right?