Poor tube drivers being asked to drive trains not on their normal route - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

Poor tube drivers being asked to drive trains not on their normal route

£0.00 @
Poor drivers will strike this week because they are being asked to drive trains on lines which they don't normally work on. In turn passengers will have to travel on lines which they dont normally …
davewave Avatar
4w, 3h agoPosted 4 weeks, 3 hours ago
Poor drivers will strike this week because they are being asked to drive trains on lines which they don't normally work on.

In turn passengers will have to travel on lines which they dont normally travel on.
Tags:
davewave Avatar
4w, 3h agoPosted 4 weeks, 3 hours ago
Options

Top Comments

(5)
12 Likes
Oh thee who know so little oO Please don't post on things you do not understand . Tube Drivers ,like train drivers have to "know" the route . That is- where every signal is ,where every station is , where every speed limit is , where every crossing is - I could go on . A train driver or tube driver cannot be made to drive a route he has not qualified for , but can quite rightly refuse to drive a route that he is not certified on . Try to get your facts right please . I am not a driver but work in the Rail industry .
10 Likes
Quite agree with the drivers - they might take the wrong turning and get lost!!!
7 Likes
davewave
Lame excuse to strike because they don't like the government, not about safety but about flexibility of drivers.
Hardly a lame excuse when the safety of passengers could be at risk , but I dare say you are an expert in the field of Rail Safety ?
6 Likes

Ah so you dont like workers striking.

I wonder if you have EVER thought about the safety aspect of changing routes?

I bet you havent. In fact I know you havent.
6 Likes
davewave
rogparki
davewave
Lame excuse to strike because they don't like the government, not about safety but about flexibility of drivers.
Hardly a lame excuse when the safety of passengers could be at risk , but I dare say you are an expert in the field of Rail Safety ?
Oh safety...the age old excuse.http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/06/07/2B21A72200000578-3186671-Milking_it_Tube_drivers_striking_across_the_city_today_are_earni-m-48_1438843723264.jpg
So you don't understand -but are good at posting pics - say no more :(

All Comments

(60) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
Page:
1 Like #2
Train strikes are getting out of hand now for ridiculous reasons....
6 Likes #3

Ah so you dont like workers striking.

I wonder if you have EVER thought about the safety aspect of changing routes?

I bet you havent. In fact I know you havent.
12 Likes #4
Oh thee who know so little oO Please don't post on things you do not understand . Tube Drivers ,like train drivers have to "know" the route . That is- where every signal is ,where every station is , where every speed limit is , where every crossing is - I could go on . A train driver or tube driver cannot be made to drive a route he has not qualified for , but can quite rightly refuse to drive a route that he is not certified on . Try to get your facts right please . I am not a driver but work in the Rail industry .
#5
Lame excuse to strike because they don't like the government, not about safety but about flexibility of drivers.
7 Likes #6
davewave
Lame excuse to strike because they don't like the government, not about safety but about flexibility of drivers.
Hardly a lame excuse when the safety of passengers could be at risk , but I dare say you are an expert in the field of Rail Safety ?
10 Likes #7
Quite agree with the drivers - they might take the wrong turning and get lost!!!
3 Likes #8
rogparki
davewave
Lame excuse to strike because they don't like the government, not about safety but about flexibility of drivers.
Hardly a lame excuse when the safety of passengers could be at risk , but I dare say you are an expert in the field of Rail Safety ?
Oh safety...the age old excuse.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/06/07/2B21A72200000578-3186671-Milking_it_Tube_drivers_striking_across_the_city_today_are_earni-m-48_1438843723264.jpg
6 Likes #9
davewave
rogparki
davewave
Lame excuse to strike because they don't like the government, not about safety but about flexibility of drivers.
Hardly a lame excuse when the safety of passengers could be at risk , but I dare say you are an expert in the field of Rail Safety ?
Oh safety...the age old excuse.http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/06/07/2B21A72200000578-3186671-Milking_it_Tube_drivers_striking_across_the_city_today_are_earni-m-48_1438843723264.jpg
So you don't understand -but are good at posting pics - say no more :(
2 Likes #10
oh the horror of it...

Members at Hainault, Leytonstone and Loughton Depots are to take part in the strike against plans to move eight train operators from three depots on the Central Line to other depots.

http://www.sopitas.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/lloro.gif
1 Like #11
Keep on striking your way to redundancy. Driverless cars, taxis, buses and lorries are all on the very close horizon. Tube trains would be the easiest to convert to self driving. They control the speed and when to stop..... all on a contained track. Bye Bye drivers.
3 Likes #12
davewave
oh the horror of it...Members at Hainault, Leytonstone and Loughton Depots are to take part in the strike against plans to move eight train operators from three depots on the Central Line to other depots.http://www.sopitas.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/lloro.gif
Sadly in your ignorance , you have posted (rather repeated a newspaper article ) one of the few legitimate complaints the rail staff have . DOO (The excuse for the Southern Rail disruption) has been certified as being safe and is widely operated over the network and is an excuse for the militant unions to go beyond their remit .

Driving a train on a route the driver has not been certified for is unsafe and illegal . Please try to get some facts right :(
2 Likes #13

Be honest Dave, how many times have you been turned down for a train driver job? X)

On a serious note, I completely agree with this...

"If [London Underground] are allowed to get away with this move on the Central Line they will start shunting drivers around at the drop of a hat regardless of the consequences," he added.

If workers knew the changes were a possibility from day one of signing up to the job, then fair enough. But to suddenly have big changes forced on you without negotiation is a little unfair imo. Why should workers have to make changes to their working pattern etc when the company refuses to hire enough staff or make fair decisions by consulting their staff first?

Don't get why they (tfl, other companies...) keep doing it tbh. They know it almost always ends up with a strike, why not plan ahead, talk to their staff and deal with changes appropriately & fairly? Makes me think this is exactly what they want to so more people back them to replace "ungrateful, overpaid" staff by machines. (_;)
#14
rogparki
davewave
oh the horror of it...Members at Hainault, Leytonstone and Loughton Depots are to take part in the strike against plans to move eight train operators from three depots on the Central Line to other depots.http://www.sopitas.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/lloro.gif
Sadly in your ignorance , you have posted (rather repeated a newspaper article ) one of the few legitimate complaints the rail staff have . DOO (The excuse for the Southern Rail disruption) has been certified as being safe and is widely operated over the network and is an excuse for the militant unions to go beyond their remit .
Driving a train on a route the driver has not been certified for is unsafe and illegal . Please try to get some facts right :(
If it's illegal then why do they need to strike? Surely they can just take the appropriate legal action?
1 Like #15
davewave
rogparki
davewave
Lame excuse to strike because they don't like the government, not about safety but about flexibility of drivers.
Hardly a lame excuse when the safety of passengers could be at risk , but I dare say you are an expert in the field of Rail Safety ?
Oh safety...the age old excuse.http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/06/07/2B21A72200000578-3186671-Milking_it_Tube_drivers_striking_across_the_city_today_are_earni-m-48_1438843723264.jpg

I like the fact that they tube driver attacks as rare but the numbers aren't that different.
1 Like #16
Maybe they can use the time off to learn the new routes. :)
#17
They work underground like miners ... very stressful...
#18
davewave
rogparki
davewave
Lame excuse to strike because they don't like the government, not about safety but about flexibility of drivers.
Hardly a lame excuse when the safety of passengers could be at risk , but I dare say you are an expert in the field of Rail Safety ?
Oh safety...the age old excuse.http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/06/07/2B21A72200000578-3186671-Milking_it_Tube_drivers_striking_across_the_city_today_are_earni-m-48_1438843723264.jpg

I don't get why people compare people's jobs either.
Boooohhh you have it better than me! IT'S SO UNFAIR! *cries in the corner*
3 Likes #19
Aiden1512
Be honest Dave, how many times have you been turned down for a train driver job? X)
On a serious note, I completely agree with this...
"If [London Underground] are allowed to get away with this move on the Central Line they will start shunting drivers around at the drop of a hat regardless of the consequences," he added.
If workers knew the changes were a possibility from day one of signing up to the job, then fair enough. But to suddenly have big changes forced on you without negotiation is a little unfair imo. Why should workers have to make changes to their working pattern etc when the company refuses to hire enough staff or make fair decisions by consulting their staff first?
Don't get why they (tfl, other companies...) keep doing it tbh. They know it almost always ends up with a strike, why not plan ahead, talk to their staff and deal with changes appropriately & fairly? Makes me think this is exactly what they want to so more people back them to replace "ungrateful, overpaid" staff by machines. (_;)
I travel to work by train and tube, and that's honestly why its so grating, they arent doctors or lawyers - their jobs simply aren't as complex as even a nurse but they provide a vital service with a blackmailing union in tow.
6 Likes #20
davewave
Aiden1512
Be honest Dave, how many times have you been turned down for a train driver job? X)
On a serious note, I completely agree with this...
"If [London Underground] are allowed to get away with this move on the Central Line they will start shunting drivers around at the drop of a hat regardless of the consequences," he added.
If workers knew the changes were a possibility from day one of signing up to the job, then fair enough. But to suddenly have big changes forced on you without negotiation is a little unfair imo. Why should workers have to make changes to their working pattern etc when the company refuses to hire enough staff or make fair decisions by consulting their staff first?
Don't get why they (tfl, other companies...) keep doing it tbh. They know it almost always ends up with a strike, why not plan ahead, talk to their staff and deal with changes appropriately & fairly? Makes me think this is exactly what they want to so more people back them to replace "ungrateful, overpaid" staff by machines. (_;)
I travel to work by train and tube, and that's honestly why its so grating, they arent doctors or lawyers - their jobs simply aren't as complex as even a nurse but they provide a vital service with a blackmailing union in tow.
I think you are still showing you do not understand a drivers job and the learning and route knowledge required - trust me its not like being a bus or HGV driver - I for one wouldn't do it .
#21
davewave
Aiden1512
Be honest Dave, how many times have you been turned down for a train driver job? X)
On a serious note, I completely agree with this...
"If [London Underground] are allowed to get away with this move on the Central Line they will start shunting drivers around at the drop of a hat regardless of the consequences," he added.
If workers knew the changes were a possibility from day one of signing up to the job, then fair enough. But to suddenly have big changes forced on you without negotiation is a little unfair imo. Why should workers have to make changes to their working pattern etc when the company refuses to hire enough staff or make fair decisions by consulting their staff first?
Don't get why they (tfl, other companies...) keep doing it tbh. They know it almost always ends up with a strike, why not plan ahead, talk to their staff and deal with changes appropriately & fairly? Makes me think this is exactly what they want to so more people back them to replace "ungrateful, overpaid" staff by machines. (_;)
I travel to work by train and tube, and that's honestly why its so grating, they arent doctors or lawyers - their jobs simply aren't as complex as even a nurse but they provide a vital service with a blackmailing union in tow.

I get that, but there's no point comparing their job to anyone else's. Tbh, I think 1 train drivers job is more important than that of a doctor or lawyer. Look what happens when a few train drivers strike, London goes into absolute meltdown and it creates chaos. If the same number of doctors or nurses strikes, there's plenty more to do their job whilst they're not there and it won't cause as much of a disruption. This is the point the employers don't seem to grasp. You said it yourself, they provide an extremely vital service and in turn the company who hires them should recognise their importance and take them a little more seriously when they say they are being treated unfairly.
#22
davewave
oh the horror of it...Members at Hainault, Leytonstone and Loughton Depots are to take part in the strike against plans to move eight train operators from three depots on the Central Line to other depots.http://www.sopitas.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/lloro.gif
And of course if you had signed up to work at your Local Tesco , for instance , you would be quite happy to find you were now required to work at a Tesco 20 miles away - would you ?
2 Likes #23
japes
Keep on striking your way to redundancy. Driverless cars, taxis, buses and lorries are all on the very close horizon. Tube trains would be the easiest to convert to self driving. They control the speed and when to stop..... all on a contained track. Bye Bye drivers.


​ out of curiosity, do you drive? and how close on the horizon are you talking? sure there is prototypes of driverless cars, are they affordable? ready for the masses? public transport overhaul by machines without drivers, won't happen in our lifetime.
in the meantime you'll have to put up with it lol
5 Likes #24

Here you go Mr Indenial

Look at the reasons for a majority of serious incidents on the tube network.

You will notice most of the accidents have been caused by derailment. Basically going to fast on a stretch of line.

Now NO ONE (INCLUDING YOU) can disagree with the fact that moving drivers about onto unfamiliar lines would increase the risk of derailments.

& guess who you would be suing if you were injured on a tube that derailed caused by an unfamiliar driver. I bet you wouldnt sue the driver.

Stop trolling.
#25
Jubilee line major delays today now this :(
#26
Aiden1512
Be honest Dave, how many times have you been turned down for a train driver job? X)
On a serious note, I completely agree with this...
"If [London Underground] are allowed to get away with this move on the Central Line they will start shunting drivers around at the drop of a hat regardless of the consequences," he added.
If workers knew the changes were a possibility from day one of signing up to the job, then fair enough. But to suddenly have big changes forced on you without negotiation is a little unfair imo. Why should workers have to make changes to their working pattern etc when the company refuses to hire enough staff or make fair decisions by consulting their staff first?
Don't get why they (tfl, other companies...) keep doing it tbh. They know it almost always ends up with a strike, why not plan ahead, talk to their staff and deal with changes appropriately & fairly? Makes me think this is exactly what they want to so more people back them to replace "ungrateful, overpaid" staff by machines. (_;)

It's not often I disagree with you and today might be the first.

They are tube drivers. I would expect them to drive tube trains wherever on the network. Yes they should and need to be given time to learn other routes. This should be standard so you have full coverage of the network.
They are not asking them to clean the toilets and paint the train. Just to drive more than one route.

If every delivery job (they are just delivering people from one place to another) striked everyone somebody changed the route everything would stop.
No buses today? No driver off.
No milk today? No drive off.
No post today? No drive off.
No petrol today? No driver off.

As has been said earlier it's a job that will be gone.
Just think one day we may have trains that run 24/7 and on time that never make mistakes. Welcome to automated tube networks!
#27
rogparki
davewave
oh the horror of it...Members at Hainault, Leytonstone and Loughton Depots are to take part in the strike against plans to move eight train operators from three depots on the Central Line to other depots.http://www.sopitas.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/lloro.gif
And of course if you had signed up to work at your Local Tesco , for instance , you would be quite happy to find you were now required to work at a Tesco 20 miles away - would you ?


yeah how will they get there?​
1 Like #28
They may get lost,there are no satnavs fitted on on the tube trains !
1 Like #29
Hmmm, they need to be careful what they wish for. Whilst i sympathise with the Southern Trains strikes regarding the safety aspect of closing doors - London Underground could be automated with relative ease.
DLR is an automated system, and the underground trains could be adapted to become automated.
I fear the management will see this as another nail in the coffin and another step towards an automated system. I wouldn't be surprised if its already on the drawing board.

Yep, i was right:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automation_of_the_London_Underground#Current_status

Edited By: 118luke on Jan 24, 2017 20:42
2 Likes #30
YouDontWantToKnow

Ah so you dont like workers striking.

I wonder if you have EVER thought about the safety aspect of changing routes?

I bet you havent. In fact I know you havent.


Passive aggressive much? Since when did you acquire the gift of mind reading? I don't disagree regarding the possibility of safety concerns. But dude, you could work on your communication skills so you don't come across as quite so arrogant perhaps? Knowing his thoughts?? X)
#31
rogparki
Oh thee who know so little oO Please don't post on things you do not understand . Tube Drivers ,like train drivers have to "know" the route . That is- where every signal is ,where every station is , where every speed limit is , where every crossing is - I could go on . A train driver or tube driver cannot be made to drive a route he has not qualified for , but can quite rightly refuse to drive a route that he is not certified on . Try to get your facts right please . I am not a driver but work in the Rail industry .

You're right but I think this dispute is purely about displacement, ie being made to transfer to a different depot. As you rightly said, they can't/wouldn't ever be made, or even asked, to drive a train on a route they don't 'sign'. It just wouldn't happen.


Edited By: deeky on Jan 24, 2017 21:21: .
#32
BagABargain78
Knowing his thoughts?? X)

lol

I know David.

Stick around. It will not take you long either.
#33
YouDontWantToKnow
BagABargain78
Knowing his thoughts?? X)

lol

I know David.

Stick around. It will not take you long either.


Hmmmmm. To be fair, I have begun to notice a common theme with David's threads.
#34
BagABargain78
YouDontWantToKnow
BagABargain78
Knowing his thoughts?? X)

lol

I know David.

Stick around. It will not take you long either.


Hmmmmm. To be fair, I have begun to notice a common theme with David's threads.


​you seem familiar?
2 Likes #35
118luke
Hmmm, they need to be careful what they wish for. Whilst i sympathise with the Southern Trains strikes regarding the safety aspect of closing doors - London Underground could be automated with relative ease.
DLR is an automated system, and the underground trains could be adapted to become automated.
I fear the management will see this as another nail in the coffin and another step towards an automated system. I wouldn't be surprised if its already on the drawing board.
Yep, i was right:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automation_of_the_London_Underground#Current_status

If you automated the the tube you'd still need staff on the trains for safety reasons, DLR is a smaller system thats mainly overground and a clear route, the tube is a rabbit warren of lines crisscrossing both used and unused, pitch dark, overheated tunnels and is very deepon some lines.
5 Likes #36
rogparki
Oh thee who know so little oO Please don't post on things you do not understand . Tube Drivers ,like train drivers have to "know" the route . That is- where every signal is ,where every station is , where every speed limit is , where every crossing is - I could go on . A train driver or tube driver cannot be made to drive a route he has not qualified for , but can quite rightly refuse to drive a route that he is not certified on . Try to get your facts right please . I am not a driver but work in the Rail industry .

Agree with every single word.......and just for the record......I AM a train driver. Fancy driving 500 miles in dense fog, visibility 5 metres? Did I mention you have to do it at over 100mph, drive at the correct speed limits for each area and manage to stop your train on a platform that is just about long enough? Those of you that say we should learn more routes......there's something called route retention. Means you have to be able to go over the route every so often so that you don't forget it.......and yes, remembering the route does come in handy when driving in the aforementioned fog. I won't even bother replying to the poster who tried to compare us to bus drivers.

The actual dispute that has been referred to has nothing to do with routes. The dispute is that the companies are moving drivers from one short staffed depot to another short staffed depot instead of recruiting more drivers to fill vacancies. Robbing Peter to pay Paul. All that happens is that staff will get uprooted from their normal workplace to work somewhere else, leaving the original depot even more short staffed leading to more cancellations.

Edited By: t_kaay on Jan 25, 2017 00:08
#37
There are already driver less trains. In fact the Victoria, Jubilee and central lines are not controlled by a driver. They do have one on board who opens the doors. They need to develop this more so they can get rid of the whinging drivers.
#38
666FU
There are already driver less trains. In fact the Victoria, Jubilee and central lines are not controlled by a driver. They do have one on board who opens the doors.

This is a joke right?

Or have i just fallen for the bait and replied to your trolling :(
#39
MajesticUnicorn
666FU
There are already driver less trains. In fact the Victoria, Jubilee and central lines are not controlled by a driver. They do have one on board who opens the doors.
This is a joke right?
Or have i just fallen for the bait and replied to your trolling :(

Trolling

No driverless trains exist bar some on the Docklands Light
1 Like #40
Project Envy, average wage in London is £35000 , plenty of self employed jobbers earn this money easily. What's that you need to earn at least to get a cheap flat in the suburbs again !? Just because many earn less, but 40% of Londoners earn more and they there are not 3 million bankers in London, project Envy wants to drive everyone's wages to the bottom.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Looking for Twitter login?
Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!