PROOF THAT THE SYSTEM WORKS
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16963116
>
>
>
>
>
>
Bailout of banks cost £289bn of taxpayer money
>
>
>
>
>
Damage of 1.5 trillion to the economy
>
>
>
>
>
Bank of England to inject £50bn into the economy
>
>
>
>
>
>
The system works
On a serious note - if there is any more information you can give me that'd be great :-)
There's always two sides to every story (in this case; corruption and greed)
All Comments (23)
Jump to unread Post a CommentFrom my calculations it screws the rich more than the poor, so at least thats one ray of sunshine X)
rising prices hit the poor far more than the rich
But percentage wise the rich have lost more. I'd rather lose 10% of £100 than 10% of a million.
I'd rather lose 10% of a million cos I'd still have £900,000 in my bank rather than £90 ;)
Me too but feel the pain of losing 100k X)
From my calculations it screws the rich more than the poor, so at least thats one ray of sunshine X)
rising prices hit the poor far more than the rich
But percentage wise the rich have lost more. I'd rather lose 10% of £100 than 10% of a million.
I'd rather lose 10% of a million cos I'd still have £900,000 in my bank rather than £90 ;)
Me too but feel the pain of losing 100k X)
It's all relative to percentages imo.
If I had £100 life savings and gave £10 to charity
If someone else had £1000 and gave £20 to charity
Who has given more?
It's all relative to percentages imo.
If I had £100 life savings and gave £10 to charity
If someone else had £1000 and gave £20 to charity
Who has given more?
Now your talking semantics.
Spok he say" £20 to charity".
Bleeding heart liberal(Plum) he say "£100 life savings and gave £10 to charity".
Cameron he say "Were all in it together" he means were all equal, but some of us are more equal than others.
Miliband he say "durpy durp durp".