Raid Hard Drives.... - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HotUKDeals, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HotUKDeals app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

Raid Hard Drives....

£0.00 @
Hi, i have a quick question, I am going to Raid one of my drives (C;/) so i can have a backup of all data incase the drive dies. My question is when i do this, can i then have another raid 1 for an… Read More
max401 Avatar
7y, 5m agoPosted 7 years, 5 months ago
Hi, i have a quick question, I am going to Raid one of my drives (C;/) so i can have a backup of all data incase the drive dies.

My question is when i do this, can i then have another raid 1 for another drive? so basically 2 drives and both being mirrored on another 2 drives

thanks
max401 Avatar
7y, 5m agoPosted 7 years, 5 months ago
Options

All Comments

(6) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#1
Kinda of confusing.
So am i right in saying you have 4 hard disks. You want to set up a raid, so therefore you have 2 matching pairs of hard disks. Or maybe they are all the same. Right?

Why don't you set up a Raid 0 for performance and with the other 2 keep the same information on both.
As I don't think if you wanted to backup information a RAID is in your best interests. As if one hard disk goes down then you loose all your information. So in theory you double your chances of loosing your data if one of those hard disks dies.

Actually you could setup a RAID 5 with all four hard disks, if one fails you should still have your data, if two fail, it's lost. That's my understanding.
#2
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6558
Have a read.

Still don't think a RAID is the safest option.
#3
Kermit2004;7066564
Kinda of confusing.
So am i right in saying you have 4 hard disks. You want to set up a raid, so therefore you have 2 matching pairs of hard disks. Or maybe they are all the same. Right?

Why don't you set up a Raid 0 for performance and with the other 2 keep the same information on both.
As I don't think if you wanted to backup information a RAID is in your best interests. As if one hard disk goes down then you loose all your information. So in theory you double your chances of loosing your data if one of those hard disks dies.

Actually you could setup a RAID 5 with all four hard disks, if one fails you should still have your data, if two fail, it's lost. That's my understanding.



Go with RAID 5 and connect 4 hard disks. Two separate RAID 1's would be overkill unless you need it for a critical system with very high read/write rates.
#4
RAID is not a backup system, it's a redundancy system. The only thing it protects against is disk failure and won't protect against accidentally deleted, corrupted or otherwise lost files like a backup system.
#5
from memory
raid 0 = striping (for performance, workload is spread amongst several disks appearing as one volume)
raid 1= mirrored, work is written to both disks ensuring copy incase of drive failure
raid 5= 2 disks in raid 0 plus one containing checksum data to recreate failed disk 1 or 2
raid 0+1(sometimes called raid 10) this is where drives are striped but also duplicated (incase of drive failure)on spare disks so number of disks need to be 4 plus.
the advantage of raid 1 and 10 is that the array can continue working even if a single drive fails.
#6
Putting truely identical drives in a PC will more than likely result in all failing at the same time.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!