Roman Polanski - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

Roman Polanski

iNSOMANiAC Avatar
7y, 3m agoPosted 7 years, 3 months ago
Why does this self confessed paedophile seem to have support from everyone, everywhere. From all the people who have starred in his films and now the French president, it seems if you're rich and famous enough, it doesnt matter if you used to fiddle with kids.

He should be dragged back to the US and charged.
iNSOMANiAC Avatar
7y, 3m agoPosted 7 years, 3 months ago
Options

All Comments

(30) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
#2
or stoned in the middle east...
banned#3
or chemically castrated in poland
#4
he should get a hold of wacko jackos lawyers.
banned#5
Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown.
#6
Id rather he got hold of his pharmacist to be honest
#7
'it seems if you're rich and famous enough, it doesnt matter if you used to fiddle with kids'

Example #2 : Michael Jackson
banned#8
funlovincriminal
'it seems if you're rich and famous enough, it doesnt matter if you used to fiddle with kids'

Example #2 : Michael Jackson


Found innocent - move on:whistling:
#9
FilthAndFurry;6411910
Found innocent - move on:whistling:

This is true.
#10
Michael Jackson was aquitted due to lack of evidence

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/14/jackson.trial/index.html


that is a world away from being 'found innocent'
#11
Jackson touched children...
#12
Guilty until proven innocent; doesn't apply to Roman though he's already admitted guilt.

iNSOMANiAC
He should be dragged back to the US and charged.


Here's hoping!
#13
rossg91
Jackson touched children...


He did not ! Just ask the parents he paid off before the ones thats took him to court
banned#14
iNSOMANiAC
He did not ! Just ask the parents he paid off before the ones thats took him to court


He didn't pay them off.

Polanski was unlucky that he was up against The Godfather - Part Two at the 1974 Oscars. Great movie though.
#15
http://i.cdn.turner.com/trutv/thesmokinggun.com/graphics/art3/0616042retainer1.gif
#16
roman polanski, michael jackson and didnt bill wyman admit to it? outside of celebrity lala land the would be called the sick pervs that they are, and saying jacko was innocent is like saying oj simpson was a model husband.:x
#17
chezz2
roman polanski, michael jackson and didnt bill wyman admit to it? outside of celebrity lala land the would be called the sick pervs that they are, and saying jacko was innocent is like saying oj simpson was a model husband.:x


You cant tell some people, they like to argue for the sake of it without knowing any of the facts.
banned#18
iNSOMANiAC
You cant tell some people, they like to argue for the sake of it without knowing any of the facts.


Please, let's not talk about facts. It won't help you.

The fact of the Michael Jackson payout is that he didn't want to pay the family - his insurers did so as to avoid the publicity of a case.
banned#19
chezz2
roman polanski, michael jackson and didnt bill wyman admit to it? outside of celebrity lala land the would be called the sick pervs that they are, and saying jacko was innocent is like saying oj simpson was a model husband.:x


Saying Michael Jackson (and incidentally OJ) was not guilty is just respecting the rule of law and wanting to avoid making libellous statements.
#20
You cannot argue with followers of cult figures,There are still people who thought it was okay to let David koresh have sex with their kids,
#21
iNSOMANiAC
He did not ! Just ask the parents he paid off before the ones thats took him to court


Check your facts before posting utter *****.

Jackson's Insurance Company was the ones that did the deal, they are the ones that paid off the kid and his family, Jackson refused to do so but was pushed, he wanted to go to court.
#22
Wotwot123
Check your facts before posting utter *****.

Jackson's Insurance Company was the ones that did the deal, they are the ones that paid off the kid and his family, Jackson refused to do so but was pushed, he wanted to go to court.


Is this the same bloke that swore he never bleached his skin and had only had one nose job that wanted to go to court ? :-D :roll: , some people lol.
#23
iNSOMANiAC
Is this the same bloke that swore he never bleached his skin and had only had one nose job that wanted to go to court ? :-D :roll: , some people lol.


And his only vice was the odd glass of jesus juice,Honest all the way,,,,,,,
banned#24
iNSOMANiAC
Is this the same bloke that swore he never bleached his skin and had only had one nose job that wanted to go to court ? :-D :roll: , some people lol.


http://intertubes.info/downloads/images/motivation/facepalm.jpg
#25
perhaps the people who spend so much time considering the letter of the law would like to consider how they would feel facing upto the financial might of one of these celebs if their own child had been abused. to take someone to court and put your child through the wringer is horrendous enough in a british court to have to do it against a celeb is a david and goliath endeavour. most will cave in. to think that money cannot buy their freedom is naive.
banned#26
chezz2
perhaps the people who spend so much time considering the letter of the law would like to consider how they would feel facing upto the financial might of one of these celebs if their own child had been abused. to take someone to court and put your child through the wringer is horrendous enough in a british court to have to do it against a celeb is a david and goliath endeavour. most will cave in. to think that money cannot buy their freedom is naive.


Not sure how much money I would need to be appeased at my child being molested.
#27
:) polanski to have 3 weeks holiday in mc donalds...that should make him happy!!!!
#28
paying off parents to avoid court 'to avoid adverse publicity' rather than fighting to clear your name is certainly an ..........interesting plan lol, despite the fact is makes you appear more guilty i suppose it does have the positive effect of making law suits disappear.
#29
iNSOMANiAC
paying off parents to avoid court 'to avoid adverse publicity' rather than fighting to clear your name is certainly an ..........interesting plan lol, despite the fact is makes you appear more guilty i suppose it does have the positive effect of making law suits disappear.


id say that about sums it up insomniac
banned#30
chezz2
id say that about sums it up insomniac


If you look at it very simplistically it does, without factoring in the insurer's concerns.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!