South Africa v Mexio discusion ****SPOILERS**** - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

South Africa v Mexio discusion ****SPOILERS****

Redking Avatar
6y, 5m agoPosted 6 years, 5 months ago
A thread for all those watching who have skiving work to watch the match!

Team news:
South Africa

* 16 Khune
* 02 Gaxa
* 04 Mokoena Captain
* 15 Thwala
* 20 Khumalo
* 08 Tshabalala
* 10 Pienaar
* 11 Modise
* 12 Letsholonyane
* 13 Dikgacoi
* 09 Katlego Mphela


Mexico

* 01 Perez
* 02 Rodriguez
* 03 Salcido
* 04 Marquez
* 05 Osorio
* 12 Aguilar
* 16 Juarez
* 06 Torrado Captain
* 09 Franco
* 11 Vela
* 17 Giovani
Tags:
Redking Avatar
6y, 5m agoPosted 6 years, 5 months ago
Options

All Comments

(91) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
Page:
#1
reckon this will be a draw myself, gone for Franco to score first and it to finish 2 -2

bit of a long shot I know
#2
lmao yellow are green tops yukkk! x
#3
i reckon 2-1 to south africa x just a guess x
#4
xbecky07x
lmao yellow are green tops yukkk! x


brazil wear similar and everyone says their kit is amazing
[mod]#5
3-1 Mexico.

Shame Hernandez is not playing.
suspended#6
My free money is on Mexico but cant help wanting South Africa to win

Head says 1-1 though lol
banned#7
Come on SA.
#8
magicjay1986
3-1 Mexico.

Shame Hernandez is not playing.


cant see South Africa losing to such a large score on their first match, the fans will be right behind them and they'll be up for it
banned#9
c'mon mexico :thumbsup:
2-0 to mexico
#10
theres gona be goals in this game
#11
I've got my money on

mexico win
mexico win 2-1
mexico/mexico

then an outside at 33/1 for south africa/mexico
banned#12
I've had £25 on south africa/mexico @33/1
#13
SA really need to get their foot on the ball and settle, Mexico are gona run rings around them otherwise
#14
CANT HEAR COMMENTARY. Or is that a good thing?


Fetching Horns.
#15
Adam2050
CANT HEAR COMMENTARY. Or is that a good thing?


Fetching Horns.


surely they'll get tired in a few mins?
banned#16
anyone else getting bored of all these stupid slow mo replays of random things?
#17
tired will theyyy eck them horns r doiin our heads in! x
banned#18
Adam2050
CANT HEAR COMMENTARY. Or is that a good thing?


Fetching Horns.


guaranteed some idiot will have one in the pub tonight!
pretty sure he will need it removed from his arse by closing time :thumbsup:
#19
roryk83
surely they'll get tired in a few mins?


Nope they don't seem too. I have a headache, don't think the surround sounds going on this world cup.
#20
rm13_hammer
guaranteed some idiot will have one in the pub tonight!
pretty sure he will need it removed from his arse by closing time :thumbsup:


:thumbsup:
#21
I was deciding wether to go to south africa for a few of these matches, glad i didn't now. Those horns are the worst idea ever!!

I like it when you can hear the chants from each supporters, this is ridiculous, not a good atmosphere at all
[mod]#22
I love a World Cup.
#23
Hopefully enough people will complain about them that they will ban them from the matches. I am just NOT enjoying this at all
#24
magicjay1986
I love a World Cup.


I love a D cup
#25
roryk83
I love a D cup


DD?
[mod]#26
roryk83
I love a D cup


Adam2050
DD?


More than a handful is a waste.
#27
ivegotalobon
I was deciding wether to go to south africa for a few of these matches, glad i didn't now. Those horns are the worst idea ever!!

I like it when you can hear the chants from each supporters, this is ridiculous, not a good atmosphere at all


attack of the killer bees......

same as the confederations cup last year

crap for tv but probably decent if youre there blowing 1:w00t:
#28
casparwhite


crap for tv but probably decent if youre there blowing 1:w00t:


thats what all the girls say
#29
I think this is going to backfire for them, the only thing this world cup is going to be remembered for is this god awful racket
#30
game needs a goal!
[mod]#31
It does need a goal.
#32
wasnt there a man on the line for that corner so how was it offside?
#33
roryk83
wasnt there a man on the line for that corner so how was it offside?


The keeper was in front of the goalscorer therefore making the man on the line irrelevant
#34
ivegotalobon
The keeper was in front of the goalscorer therefore making the man on the line irrelevant


really? never heard of that part of the offside rule before
#35
A player is in an offside position if he is in his opponents' half of the field and is nearer to his opponents' goal line than both the ball and the [COLOR="Red"]next to last opponent.[/COLOR]

The 2005 edition of the Laws of the Game included a new International Football Association Board decision that stated being "[COLOR="red"]nearer to an opponent's goal line" meant that "any part of his head, body or feet is nearer to his opponents' goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent (the last opponent typically being the goalkeeper).[/COLOR] The arms are not included in this definition."[1] This is taken to mean that any part of the attacking player named in this decision has to be past the part of the second-last defender closest to his goal line (excluding the arms) and past the part of the ball closest to the defenders' goal line.

It is not necessary that the goalkeeper be one of the last two opponents. It should be noted that any attacker that is even with or behind the ball is not in an offside position and may never be sanctioned for an offside offense. Regardless of position, there is no offside offense if a player receives the ball directly from a goal kick, corner kick, or throw-in.


Because the goalkeeper advanced ahead of the attacker, the man on the line was essentially playing the part of the goalkeeper in the offside rule you are probably accustomed to. :)
#36
xbecky07x
lmao yellow are green tops yukkk! x


The world cup from the perspective of a woman.
#37
roryk83
wasnt there a man on the line for that corner so how was it offside?


the keeper was ahead of the player

easier to think about it as once the keeper was ahead of him the man on the line essentially becomes the keeper and since there was a flick on to the striker, it was offside
#38
borolad94
The world cup from the perspective of a woman.


yes excatly!
#39
ivegotalobon
A player is in an offside position if he is in his opponents' half of the field and is nearer to his opponents' goal line than both the ball and the [COLOR="Red"]next to last opponent.[/COLOR]

The 2005 edition of the Laws of the Game included a new International Football Association Board decision that stated being "[COLOR="red"]nearer to an opponent's goal line" meant that "any part of his head, body or feet is nearer to his opponents' goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent (the last opponent typically being the goalkeeper).[/COLOR] The arms are not included in this definition."[1] This is taken to mean that any part of the attacking player named in this decision has to be past the part of the second-last defender closest to his goal line (excluding the arms) and past the part of the ball closest to the defenders' goal line.

It is not necessary that the goalkeeper be one of the last two opponents. It should be noted that any attacker that is even with or behind the ball is not in an offside position and may never be sanctioned for an offside offense. Regardless of position, there is no offside offense if a player receives the ball directly from a goal kick, corner kick, or throw-in.


Because the goalkeeper advanced ahead of the attacker, the man on the line was essentially playing the part of the goalkeeper in the offside rule you are probably accustomed to. :)


fair enough
#40
Must say the officials have been on the ball so far, apart from maybe the cheap yellow card earlier for the handball/blocking african player from taking the free kick, could have just given him a warning for that.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!