"Two viewers were concerned....." - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HUKD, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HUKD app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

"Two viewers were concerned....."

cookingfat Avatar
2y, 5m agoPosted 2 years, 5 months ago
"Two viewers were concerned....."

Seriously!!???
cookingfat Avatar
2y, 5m agoPosted 2 years, 5 months ago
Options

Top Comments

(5)
13 Likes
"Two viewers were concerned" enough to complain, out of what, 3 million viewers?

I can think of two viewers who need to get a life.
banned 11 Likes
I like him. It's so good to see someone who's not afraid to tell it like it is these days in this cesspool of political correctness that we have to wade through before we say anything.

The people who get offended at things like this and then go out of their way to make a complaint are just pathetic.

Remember people, offence is taken, not given!

Edited By: KillFelix on Jul 28, 2014 14:23: sp
8 Likes
Jeremy Clarkson personally went to meet these 2 viewers
http://i.imgur.com/PyAAPpA.gif
banned 6 Likes
https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/6004862208/hDD73E3BA/
banned 6 Likes
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry

All Comments

(101) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
Page:
4 Likes #3
Thats a new on one me. Never ever heard that word being said in a racist way. He isn't a silly man though, if it is a racist term, I think he would have known exactly what he was doing/saying. Still, I thought more than 2 would need to complain before anything was highlighted.
banned 6 Likes #4
https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/6004862208/hDD73E3BA/
banned 4 Likes #5
JC was mildly amusing when a 30 year old 'lad'. As a fifty something he's a fool and should be put out to pasture.
banned 11 Likes #6
I like him. It's so good to see someone who's not afraid to tell it like it is these days in this cesspool of political correctness that we have to wade through before we say anything.

The people who get offended at things like this and then go out of their way to make a complaint are just pathetic.

Remember people, offence is taken, not given!

Edited By: KillFelix on Jul 28, 2014 14:23: sp
#7
Op wtf..that was my choice of username that a mod said wasn't allowed..lol

JC should go join Ukip as a candidate MP, he would go down a storm..:)
1 Like #8
Not going to post my comment as I know it will be removed and no reasons given

Seems that someone @ HUKD's is working @ Ofcom or the Equality and Human Rights Commission (sad that neither are doing a proper job)
1 Like #9
Never heard that term in my life. Everyone gets offended by something
1 Like #10
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.
banned 6 Likes #11
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry
1 Like #12
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry

Pretty sure he did, why would he say sorry if he said nothing?
banned#13
haritori
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry

Pretty sure he did, why would he say sorry if he said nothing?

Have a listen for yourself. Also bear in mind it wasn't even broadcast!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hcsefsI1S4
#14
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry


Jeremey Clarkson relies on people being offended to keep him in a job.

He shouldn't be surprised his "it was only a joke" antics backfire.

Replace him with Stewart Lee I say.
#15
KillFelix
haritori
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry

Pretty sure he did, why would he say sorry if he said nothing?

Have a listen for yourself. Also bear in mind it wasn't even broadcast!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hcsefsI1S4

I have and i dont know, but i dont like clarkson so i dont care lol.
banned#16
komakino
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry


Jeremey Clarkson relies on people being offended to keep him in a job.

He shouldn't be surprised his "it was only a joke" antics backfire.

Replace him with Stewart Lee I say.

I think he relies on the world wide sales of Top Gear, really.

If you look at it, he never says anything really bad, it's just the press blow it all out of proportion as usual.

What was the one before that? Oh yeah he said in a passing comment that public sector strikers should be shot.

Is that really that offensive? I mean really?
#17
haritori
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry

Pretty sure he did, why would he say sorry if he said nothing?

According to him, it sounded like he did, but he didn't. Unusual show of contrition from him here.
banned 1 Like #18
haritori
KillFelix
haritori
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry

Pretty sure he did, why would he say sorry if he said nothing?

Have a listen for yourself. Also bear in mind it wasn't even broadcast!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hcsefsI1S4

I have and i dont know, but i dont like clarkson so i dont care lol.

So you don't care that he got hounded by the press and forced into issuing an apology for something that he really didn't do that also nearly cost him his job, purely because you don't like him?

Seems rational oO
#19
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry


Jeremey Clarkson relies on people being offended to keep him in a job.

He shouldn't be surprised his "it was only a joke" antics backfire.

Replace him with Stewart Lee I say.

I think he relies on the world wide sales of Top Gear, really.

If you look at it, he never says anything really bad, it's just the press blow it all out of proportion as usual.

What was the one before that? Oh yeah he said in a passing comment that public sector strikers should be shot.

Is that really that offensive? I mean really?

Well I don't find it offensive. But he knew some would, given the context. And a lot of his humour relies on that.

Offence can be intended. A lot of comedy relies on that.
banned 3 Likes #20
komakino
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry


Jeremey Clarkson relies on people being offended to keep him in a job.

He shouldn't be surprised his "it was only a joke" antics backfire.

Replace him with Stewart Lee I say.

I think he relies on the world wide sales of Top Gear, really.

If you look at it, he never says anything really bad, it's just the press blow it all out of proportion as usual.

What was the one before that? Oh yeah he said in a passing comment that public sector strikers should be shot.

Is that really that offensive? I mean really?

Well I don't find it offensive. But he knew some would, given the context. And a lot of his humour relies on that.

Offence can be intended. A lot of comedy relies on that.

I'd say most comedy does.

It's just bonkers though. Because he has a bit of a reputation for being mildly offensive then stupidly minor things get picked up on.

It's almost as if people go looking to get offended by him, going through his every word with a fine comb.

I mean two people were concerned about a line that was broadcast 4 months ago and it makes the news. Incredible. Far more offensive things on TV every single day.

Edited By: KillFelix on Jul 28, 2014 15:23
#21
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry


Jeremey Clarkson relies on people being offended to keep him in a job.

He shouldn't be surprised his "it was only a joke" antics backfire.

Replace him with Stewart Lee I say.

I think he relies on the world wide sales of Top Gear, really.

If you look at it, he never says anything really bad, it's just the press blow it all out of proportion as usual.

What was the one before that? Oh yeah he said in a passing comment that public sector strikers should be shot.

Is that really that offensive? I mean really?

Well I don't find it offensive. But he knew some would, given the context. And a lot of his humour relies on that.

Offence can be intended. A lot of comedy relies on that.

I'd say most comedy does.

It's just bonkers though. Because he has a bit of a reputation for being mildly offensive then stupidly minor things get picked up on.

It's almost as if people go looking to get offended by him, going through his every word with a fine comb.

I mean two people were concerned about a line that was broadcast 4 months ago and it makes the news. Incredible. Far more offensive things on TV every single day.

And those two people had a point according to Ofcom.
banned 3 Likes #22
komakino
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry


Jeremey Clarkson relies on people being offended to keep him in a job.

He shouldn't be surprised his "it was only a joke" antics backfire.

Replace him with Stewart Lee I say.

I think he relies on the world wide sales of Top Gear, really.

If you look at it, he never says anything really bad, it's just the press blow it all out of proportion as usual.

What was the one before that? Oh yeah he said in a passing comment that public sector strikers should be shot.

Is that really that offensive? I mean really?

Well I don't find it offensive. But he knew some would, given the context. And a lot of his humour relies on that.

Offence can be intended. A lot of comedy relies on that.

I'd say most comedy does.

It's just bonkers though. Because he has a bit of a reputation for being mildly offensive then stupidly minor things get picked up on.

It's almost as if people go looking to get offended by him, going through his every word with a fine comb.

I mean two people were concerned about a line that was broadcast 4 months ago and it makes the news. Incredible. Far more offensive things on TV every single day.

And those two people had a point according to Ofcom.

They also said it was a scripted line so surely the BBC, as his bosses and the people that ok'd the script, are to blame?
banned#23
Top rated comments on here are funny :D
#24
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry


Jeremey Clarkson relies on people being offended to keep him in a job.

He shouldn't be surprised his "it was only a joke" antics backfire.

Replace him with Stewart Lee I say.

I think he relies on the world wide sales of Top Gear, really.

If you look at it, he never says anything really bad, it's just the press blow it all out of proportion as usual.

What was the one before that? Oh yeah he said in a passing comment that public sector strikers should be shot.

Is that really that offensive? I mean really?

Well I don't find it offensive. But he knew some would, given the context. And a lot of his humour relies on that.

Offence can be intended. A lot of comedy relies on that.

I'd say most comedy does.

It's just bonkers though. Because he has a bit of a reputation for being mildly offensive then stupidly minor things get picked up on.

It's almost as if people go looking to get offended by him, going through his every word with a fine comb.

I mean two people were concerned about a line that was broadcast 4 months ago and it makes the news. Incredible. Far more offensive things on TV every single day.

And those two people had a point according to Ofcom.

They also said it was a scripted line so surely the BBC, as his bosses and the people that ok'd the script, are to blame?

Yup. He also bears partial responsibility too depending on how much input he had.
2 Likes #25
KillFelix
haritori
KillFelix
haritori
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry

Pretty sure he did, why would he say sorry if he said nothing?

Have a listen for yourself. Also bear in mind it wasn't even broadcast!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hcsefsI1S4

I have and i dont know, but i dont like clarkson so i dont care lol.

So you don't care that he got hounded by the press and forced into issuing an apology for something that he really didn't do that also nearly cost him his job, purely because you don't like him?

Seems rational oO

I was being cynical, he is part of the old institution, he is racist and prejudice generally, his comedy is for the old guys and top gears biggest audience the US simple don't get his humor so it slides fine over there... he was irrelevant a long time ago and teh BEEB insist on keeping him because they cannot see past the brand being Clarkson when in fact it isn't. i have no doubt Top Gear would be as popular if not more without him.

And yes he deserves to be hounded by the press as karma for all his racial slurs.
#26
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry


Jeremey Clarkson relies on people being offended to keep him in a job.

He shouldn't be surprised his "it was only a joke" antics backfire.

Replace him with Stewart Lee I say.

I think he relies on the world wide sales of Top Gear, really.

If you look at it, he never says anything really bad, it's just the press blow it all out of proportion as usual.

What was the one before that? Oh yeah he said in a passing comment that public sector strikers should be shot.

Is that really that offensive? I mean really?

Well I don't find it offensive. But he knew some would, given the context. And a lot of his humour relies on that.

Offence can be intended. A lot of comedy relies on that.

I'd say most comedy does.

It's just bonkers though. Because he has a bit of a reputation for being mildly offensive then stupidly minor things get picked up on.

It's almost as if people go looking to get offended by him, going through his every word with a fine comb.

I mean two people were concerned about a line that was broadcast 4 months ago and it makes the news. Incredible. Far more offensive things on TV every single day.

And those two people had a point according to Ofcom.

They also said it was a scripted line so surely the BBC, as his bosses and the people that ok'd the script, are to blame?

what was it our mothers used to say.....

If your friends jumped of a bridge, would you? no excuse, he coudl of refused it, and i am pretty sure he has a massive role in the scripting.
banned 3 Likes #27
komakino
Yup. He also bears partial responsibility too depending on how much input he had.

True - he's not completely innocent here but I still think it's not worth kicking up a fuss about.

What also annoys me is that people are deciding what is offensive to others. I see it all the time. Non-muslims saying "This is offensive to muslims!!" or British people saying "This is offensive to South Africans" for example.

Err, that is none of their business! I think that deciding what is and what isn't offensive on behalf others is more offensive than using the slur itself.

The term in question here (that I have never personally heard of before, and a lot of people are saying the same thing) is a word used to refer to someone of Asian descent.

I'd be very interested to hear if the two people complaining were in fact of Asian descent, because I have a gut feeling they are not.
banned#28
haritori
KillFelix
haritori
KillFelix
haritori
KillFelix
haritori
Its an old school racist comment, I've heard once or twice, but its better forgotten.

Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time? regardless of who it offended or how little it was another racist comment by Clarkson and again he gets to keep being employed by a company that likes to cover up.

The last time he didn't even say anything lol!


“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so ******* what."

- Stephen Fry

Pretty sure he did, why would he say sorry if he said nothing?

Have a listen for yourself. Also bear in mind it wasn't even broadcast!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hcsefsI1S4

I have and i dont know, but i dont like clarkson so i dont care lol.

So you don't care that he got hounded by the press and forced into issuing an apology for something that he really didn't do that also nearly cost him his job, purely because you don't like him?

Seems rational oO

I was being cynical, he is part of the old institution, he is racist and prejudice generally, his comedy is for the old guys and top gears biggest audience the US simple don't get his humor so it slides fine over there... he was irrelevant a long time ago and teh BEEB insist on keeping him because they cannot see past the brand being Clarkson when in fact it isn't. i have no doubt Top Gear would be as popular if not more without him.

And yes he deserves to be hounded by the press as karma for all his racial slurs.

Irrelevant? Nah. He's one of the BBC's biggest earners. His retirement from TG is fast approaching though. I'd give it 3-5 years tops.

If he ran for PM then he'd get my vote :D
#29
dont think i have heard it before but he obviously knows what it means and its obviously 'slang' so not going to be positive
assume something to do with eyes?
#30
brilly
dont think i have heard it before but he obviously knows what it means and its obviously 'slang' so not going to be positive
assume something to do with eyes?

I believe it's the slope of the forehead used by Australians and Americans in the 1970's as a reference to Vietnamese.
#31
I've never heard the term and watched the program and took it to mean the structural aspect of the bridge and nothing else. All this has done is now highlight that it is a derogatory term to a wider audience.
1 Like #32
KillFelix
komakino
Yup. He also bears partial responsibility too depending on how much input he had.

True - he's not completely innocent here but I still think it's not worth kicking up a fuss about.

What also annoys me is that people are deciding what is offensive to others. I see it all the time. Non-muslims saying "This is offensive to muslims!!" or British people saying "This is offensive to South Africans" for example.

Err, that is none of their business! I think that deciding what is and what isn't offensive on behalf others is more offensive than using the slur itself.

The term in question here (that I have never personally heard of before, and a lot of people are saying the same thing) is a word used to refer to someone of Asian descent.

I'd be very interested to hear if the two people complaining were in fact of Asian descent, because I have a gut feeling they are not.

If there's no one around to hear a racial slur against them, does it stop becoming a racial slur? :|

I agree to a certain extent with your post but if someone *knowingly* chooses to use a racial slur, that's wrong IMO.

Being a man of the world and of a certain age (Clarkson - not me), I personally think Clarkson took a calculated risk and it didn't pay off.

Well, it did...he's still in a job.
banned 1 Like #33
komakino
KillFelix
komakino
Yup. He also bears partial responsibility too depending on how much input he had.

True - he's not completely innocent here but I still think it's not worth kicking up a fuss about.

What also annoys me is that people are deciding what is offensive to others. I see it all the time. Non-muslims saying "This is offensive to muslims!!" or British people saying "This is offensive to South Africans" for example.

Err, that is none of their business! I think that deciding what is and what isn't offensive on behalf others is more offensive than using the slur itself.

The term in question here (that I have never personally heard of before, and a lot of people are saying the same thing) is a word used to refer to someone of Asian descent.

I'd be very interested to hear if the two people complaining were in fact of Asian descent, because I have a gut feeling they are not.

If there's no one around to hear a racial slur against them, does it stop becoming a racial slur? :|

I agree to a certain extent with your post but if someone *knowingly* chooses to use a racial slur, that's wrong IMO.

Being a man of the world and of a certain age (Clarkson - not me), I personally think Clarkson took a calculated risk and it didn't pay off.

Well, it did...he's still in a job.

Seems it depends on who says it, which is a bit racist in itself really.

I mean just search for the n-word on the music section on Amazon. It seems it's ok if black people use it, even right there on the front of their album!
13 Likes #34
"Two viewers were concerned" enough to complain, out of what, 3 million viewers?

I can think of two viewers who need to get a life.
banned#35
komakino
KillFelix
komakino
Yup. He also bears partial responsibility too depending on how much input he had.

True - he's not completely innocent here but I still think it's not worth kicking up a fuss about.

What also annoys me is that people are deciding what is offensive to others. I see it all the time. Non-muslims saying "This is offensive to muslims!!" or British people saying "This is offensive to South Africans" for example.

Err, that is none of their business! I think that deciding what is and what isn't offensive on behalf others is more offensive than using the slur itself.

The term in question here (that I have never personally heard of before, and a lot of people are saying the same thing) is a word used to refer to someone of Asian descent.

I'd be very interested to hear if the two people complaining were in fact of Asian descent, because I have a gut feeling they are not.

If there's no one around to hear a racial slur against them, does it stop becoming a racial slur? :|

I agree to a certain extent with your post but if someone *knowingly* chooses to use a racial slur, that's wrong IMO.

Being a man of the world and of a certain age (Clarkson - not me), I personally think Clarkson took a calculated risk and it didn't pay off.

Well, it did...he's still in a job.

Also I'm not saying that if there's no one around to hear a racial slur, I'm sure are tens of thousands of people of Asian descent that watch Top Gear. Did they complain?
banned#36
deeky
"Two viewers were concerned" enough to complain, out of what, 3 million viewers?

I can think of two viewers who need to get a life.

350 million viewers a week worldwide
2 Likes #37
haritori
Pretty sure the BBC stated the last time it was Clarksons final warning, so what happened this time?
This incident predates that other incident. This is just a report by Ofcom, he hasn't done anything new.
3 Likes #38
KillFelix
deeky
"Two viewers were concerned" enough to complain, out of what, 3 million viewers?

I can think of two viewers who need to get a life.

350 million viewers a week worldwide

Which further emphasises my point. I was just guessing the weekly BBC2 viewing figures.
#39
KillFelix
komakino
KillFelix
komakino
Yup. He also bears partial responsibility too depending on how much input he had.

True - he's not completely innocent here but I still think it's not worth kicking up a fuss about.

What also annoys me is that people are deciding what is offensive to others. I see it all the time. Non-muslims saying "This is offensive to muslims!!" or British people saying "This is offensive to South Africans" for example.

Err, that is none of their business! I think that deciding what is and what isn't offensive on behalf others is more offensive than using the slur itself.

The term in question here (that I have never personally heard of before, and a lot of people are saying the same thing) is a word used to refer to someone of Asian descent.

I'd be very interested to hear if the two people complaining were in fact of Asian descent, because I have a gut feeling they are not.

If there's no one around to hear a racial slur against them, does it stop becoming a racial slur? :|

I agree to a certain extent with your post but if someone *knowingly* chooses to use a racial slur, that's wrong IMO.

Being a man of the world and of a certain age (Clarkson - not me), I personally think Clarkson took a calculated risk and it didn't pay off.

Well, it did...he's still in a job.

Seems it depends on who says it, which is a bit racist in itself really.

I mean just search for the n-word on the music section on Amazon. It seems it's ok if black people use it, even right there on the front of their album!

Yup - Chris Rock (NSFW) does an interesting skit on that.

In an ideal world no one should use that word.

But there's an historical context in which some black people try to reclaim the word from white people.

I can partially see where they're coming from.

Edited By: komakino on Jul 28, 2014 17:00
2 Likes #40
deeky
"Two viewers were concerned" enough to complain, out of what, 3 million viewers?

I can think of two viewers who need to get a life.
are you saying its okay to be racist because only two people complained? (_;)

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!