Wikileaks makes us less safe not more. - HotUKDeals
We use cookie files to improve site functionality and personalisation. By continuing to use HotUKDeals, you accept our cookie and privacy policy.
Get the HotUKDeals app free at Google Play

Search Error

An error occurred when searching, please try again!

Login / Sign UpSubmit

Wikileaks makes us less safe not more.

£0.00 @ Safe
So Samsung TV can listen to criminals, why does Wikileaks think this is a problem for law abiding people. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/mar/07/wikileaks-cia-documents-us-russia-conflict Read More
davewave Avatar
1m, 3w agoPosted 1 month, 3 weeks ago
So Samsung TV can listen to criminals, why does Wikileaks think this is a problem for law abiding people.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/mar/07/wikileaks-cia-documents-us-russia-conflict
Other Links From Safe:
davewave Avatar
1m, 3w agoPosted 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Options

Top Comments

(3)
20 Likes
Your view is why we're doomed!
10 Likes
Because you don't decide what is law abiding... what is ok today may suddenly be not tomorrow.

I am NOT and never will be OK with giving up my privacy just because I "have nothing to hide"

I as a human being have a right to privacy and I would like to keep hold of what little rights I have left.

So T May and the rest of the government... go feck yourselves.
9 Likes
splatsplatsplat
skipperjonce
oh dear God. Have you even heard of let alone read 1984? If not then read it then rethink your naivety.

Big Bro? People willingly publicise every move they make on social media.


I think you're confusing 'people' with 'idiots'

All Comments

(56) Jump to unreadPost a comment
Comments/page:
Page:
20 Likes #1
Your view is why we're doomed!
#2
Must admit, I also don't agree with leaking information that would put spies or people under cover at risk.

That being said, i'm not surprised at the latest revelations - everything connected to the web is suspect and open to abuse by state operatives or otherwise. I remember reading three or four years ago that a user was monitoring network traffic from his LG (so its not just Samsung) smart TV and it was transmitting the contents of a flash drive he had plugged into it. The biggest revelation by far is where the leak itself has come from......you cant really trust the Americans at all to keep a secret.
2 Likes #3
praevalens
Your view is why we're doomed!
doomed, good one.
1 Like #4
davewave
praevalens
Your view is why we're doomed!
doomed, good one.


Thanks. I didn't want to waste too much time on this so I was succinct. Read up rather than relying on uninformed peers.
1 Like #5
oh dear God. Have you even heard of let alone read 1984? If not then read it then rethink your naivety.
3 Likes #6
Who said it makes us more safe, it's nothing to do with more or less safe, it achieves neither its a moot point. What it does is reveal the truth and we should all be in favour of transparency.
1 Like #7
freakstyler
Must admit, I also don't agree with leaking information that would put spies or people under cover at risk.

That being said, i'm not surprised at the latest revelations - everything connected to the web is suspect and open to abuse by state operatives or otherwise. I remember reading three or four years ago that a user was monitoring network traffic from his LG (so its not just Samsung) smart TV and it was transmitting the contents of a flash drive he had plugged into it. The biggest revelation by far is where the leak itself has come from......you cant really trust the Americans at all to keep a secret.

You know what they say about American intelligence
#8
skipperjonce
oh dear God. Have you even heard of let alone read 1984? If not then read it then rethink your naivety.

Big Bro? People willingly publicise every move they make on social media.
9 Likes #9
splatsplatsplat
skipperjonce
oh dear God. Have you even heard of let alone read 1984? If not then read it then rethink your naivety.

Big Bro? People willingly publicise every move they make on social media.


I think you're confusing 'people' with 'idiots'
3 Likes #10
Curlyman83
splatsplatsplat
skipperjonce
oh dear God. Have you even heard of let alone read 1984? If not then read it then rethink your naivety.
Big Bro? People willingly publicise every move they make on social media.
I think you're confusing 'people' with 'idiots'

How do you know they are telling the truth and not trying to look interesting.

You never see anyone saying i got up this morning had tea went superdugs to buy sanitary towels, watched tv and fell asleep on the sofa.

You see wooo look at me i went to a Indie gig in a soho bar and partied until dawn.
1 Like #11
Error440
Curlyman83
splatsplatsplat
skipperjonce
oh dear God. Have you even heard of let alone read 1984? If not then read it then rethink your naivety.
Big Bro? People willingly publicise every move they make on social media.
I think you're confusing 'people' with 'idiots'

How do you know they are telling the truth and not trying to look interesting.

You never see anyone saying i got up this morning had tea went superdugs to buy sanitary towels, watched tv and fell asleep on the sofa.

You see wooo look at me i went to a Indie gig in a soho bar and partied until dawn.


Those who are constantly on social media websites using their phones are giving away a lot more information than just what they are posting. These websites know where you are, where you've been and what your daily movement patterns are.
4 Likes #12
would law abiding people, like random strangers sitting in their house listening to their conversation? or is the tv that can do it, less intrusive?
#13
pothole
Error440
Curlyman83
splatsplatsplat
skipperjonce
oh dear God. Have you even heard of let alone read 1984? If not then read it then rethink your naivety.
Big Bro? People willingly publicise every move they make on social media.
I think you're confusing 'people' with 'idiots'
How do you know they are telling the truth and not trying to look interesting.
You never see anyone saying i got up this morning had tea went superdugs to buy sanitary towels, watched tv and fell asleep on the sofa.
You see wooo look at me i went to a Indie gig in a soho bar and partied until dawn.
Those who are constantly on social media websites using their phones are giving away a lot more information than just what they are posting. These websites know where you are, where you've been and what your daily movement patterns are.

You don't need to go on anything, the mobile phone companies track you anyway and very likely sell that info on, they can turn the mic on anytime they like and the camera. This has been known for years, indeed there was a thread about Chinese phones tracking you a few months ago to which i replied i trust the Chinese government with my data more then i trust American companies.

And people nowdays carry the things everywhere inside the home and out, my ex did that he never left the thing alone, it sat on his bedside cupboard at night and was in his pocket or mainly his hand the rest of the day, he like many others didn't need a smart tv or anything else he willingly carried his tracking device everywhere he went.
1 Like #14
davewave
Error440
Curlyman83
splatsplatsplat
skipperjonce
oh dear God. Have you even heard of let alone read 1984? If not then read it then rethink your naivety.
Big Bro? People willingly publicise every move they make on social media.
I think you're confusing 'people' with 'idiots'
How do you know they are telling the truth and not trying to look interesting.
You never see anyone saying i got up this morning had tea went superdugs to buy sanitary towels, watched tv and fell asleep on the sofa.
You see wooo look at me i went to a Indie gig in a soho bar and partied until dawn.
Yeah the authorities would have no idea of your political thoughts, you wouldn't share that would you? (on say a shopping site.)

Dave why should i fear the government knowing my political thoughts? The day that happens will be the day of revolution, totalitarianism shouldn't be tolerated by the people.
10 Likes #15
Because you don't decide what is law abiding... what is ok today may suddenly be not tomorrow.

I am NOT and never will be OK with giving up my privacy just because I "have nothing to hide"

I as a human being have a right to privacy and I would like to keep hold of what little rights I have left.

So T May and the rest of the government... go feck yourselves.
1 Like #16
It'll be the Amazon Echo next.
3 Likes #17
As per the other thread, this misc section has some strange views.

Congratulations of being dehumanised by the government OP! Years of media manipulation and so on have converted you into a good little sheep for the government.
4 Likes #18
Daddio
It'll be the Amazon Echo next.

One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; Amazon will soon take over here. And I for one welcome our new Amazon overlords. I’d like to remind them that I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground kindle caves.
#19
The biggest problem is what happens when the CIA/NSA/GCHQ loose control of these tools, or when the crooks find the flaws in systems that these departments dont report.

It's all well and good saying I dont mind them listening in on my mobile, but when some russian teen gets his hands on leaked CIA tools and drains your bank account, you'll soon complain.
#20
Error440
davewave
Error440
Curlyman83
splatsplatsplat
skipperjonce
oh dear God. Have you even heard of let alone read 1984? If not then read it then rethink your naivety.
Big Bro? People willingly publicise every move they make on social media.
I think you're confusing 'people' with 'idiots'
How do you know they are telling the truth and not trying to look interesting.
You never see anyone saying i got up this morning had tea went superdugs to buy sanitary towels, watched tv and fell asleep on the sofa.
You see wooo look at me i went to a Indie gig in a soho bar and partied until dawn.
Yeah the authorities would have no idea of your political thoughts, you wouldn't share that would you? (on say a shopping site.)
Dave why should i fear the government knowing my political thoughts? The day that happens will be the day of revolution, totalitarianism shouldn't be tolerated by the people.

If a revolution was required it would have to come early on, they are taking away privacy a bit at a time so the public don't notice and making it the norm with social media/gadgets.

If you get to the stage where we need to revolt and suddenly the government can hear and see all...were in trouble.
1 Like #21
davewave

So Samsung TV can listen to criminals, why does Wikileaks think this is a problem for law abiding people.https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/mar/07/wikileaks-cia-documents-us-russia-conflict
Why do law abidding people has a problem? Answer: for the same security and privacy reason why one has a lock to the front door, a safe in a shop, a car door lock, a password lock to one's laptop.....and discretion like: clothes to cover up one's naughty bits, hide when one pick's one's nose....and commercial in confidence like giving a commercial advantage to a third party who then uses those analytics to exploit one...and so on.
.
Law abidding does not mean others would be law abidding and commercially friendly so as to reciprocate in one's favour. A case in point is Article 50 triggering, just because UK has nothing to hide, law abidding with the House of Lords, does not mean we should not hide our hands.
.
Law abidding does not mean one gets a sticker on one's forehead so others would see this sticker and respect you and don't exploit and steal from you nor prevent you from being taken for a ride.

Edited By: splender on Mar 08, 2017 09:24: amended last sentence
#22
On the cost front, the more they collate and to process, the more it cost us tax payers. Any data collected, irrespective on what, costs money to collate, to store, to process per megabyte.
.
Analogy is, in one's household expenditure, if one spends so much money so one needs to borrow money from a bank to buy more security data collection devices, employ people to process and to store one's data , then it is reasonable for one to question why one spend's more in this than the household food bill.
2 Likes #23
Wikileaks think they're being clever telling us Samsung TV's have been hacked.

They obviously haven't seen Gogglebox on Channel 4. Noobs.
1 Like #24
splender
On the cost front, the more they collate and to process, the more it cost us tax payers. Any data collected, irrespective on what, costs money to collate, to store, to process per megabyte.
.
Analogy is, in one's household expenditure, if one spends so much money so one needs to borrow money from a bank to buy more security data collection devices, employ people to process and to store one's data , then it is reasonable for one to question why one spend's more in this than the household food bill.


if it helps to prevent attacks in UK would it be cost effective?
#25
The jews in 1920s Germany had "nothing to hide".
#26
davewave
splender
On the cost front, the more they collate and to process, the more it cost us tax payers. Any data collected, irrespective on what, costs money to collate, to store, to process per megabyte.
.
Analogy is, in one's household expenditure, if one spends so much money so one needs to borrow money from a bank to buy more security data collection devices, employ people to process and to store one's data , then it is reasonable for one to question why one spend's more in this than the household food bill.
if it helps to prevent attacks in UK would it be cost effective?
Let us know here after you have donated money and how much money that you are prepared to pay more to prevent attacks to here http://www.supportpolice.com/ to prevent attacks, or donate/sponsor here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20156574
#27
Rubisco
The jews in 1920s Germany had "nothing to hide".
A leader of USA just said journalists are the enemies of the people. Will some journalists start to get locked up in the future?!
#28
splender
Rubisco
The jews in 1920s Germany had "nothing to hide".
A leader of USA just said journalists are the enemies of the people. Will some journalists start to get locked up in the future?!

I can see it happening. Trumpettes will celebrate that day. It would not surprise me if CNN/NY Times suffered a Charlie Hebdo style attack from a brainwashed rabid loon.
1 Like #29
Rubisco
The jews in 1920s Germany had "nothing to hide".


no, they didn't, do you think our government shouldn't be tackling the Islamist terrorists, an odd analogy.
#30
splender
Rubisco
The jews in 1920s Germany had "nothing to hide".
A leader of USA just said journalists are the enemies of the people. Will some journalists start to get locked up in the future?!


probably not.
#31
davewave
Rubisco
The jews in 1920s Germany had "nothing to hide".
no, they didn't, do you think our government shouldn't be tackling the Islamist terrorists, an odd analogy.
Of course they do tackle terrorist by spending, probably started in the Middle Ages if not before, the question is how many more £billions we want to pay extra, which translates to up to how many thousands of pounds per head you want to raise VAT or income tax to pay for more. For example, how about whacking up VAT from 20% to 30%? You can google this, I think a rough figure is 100 billion US$ that UK spends on anti-terror.
#32
A lot of these exploits are zero day so they could not be used for mass surveillance.
I think people overreact to thinking that the government is looking to spy on everyone.
People working in our intelligence communities are generally decent people with respect for the rule of law and their fellow citizens.
These leaks damage our ability to fight our adversaries and terrorism.
They probably originate in Russia and are anti-Western.
At least wikileaks had a small amount of decency to redact names this time.
I think it's good to have some checks on what the government and security services are up to but these huge tranches of leaks are a gift to Russia, who hacked and leaked to help Trump get into office, China, Iran and everyone else.

Edited By: Rom on Mar 08, 2017 12:56
1 Like #33
Nothing to hide? Lets make all bank statements, medical records and passwords public information.:D

Edited By: david_wavid on Mar 08, 2017 15:22
2 Likes #34
The article doesn't mention Samsung at all davewave. Which privacy issue should law abiding people be more concerned with. The one you are alluding to, or the one mentioned in the article?
1 Like #35
davewave
Rubisco
The jews in 1920s Germany had "nothing to hide".
no, they didn't, do you think our government shouldn't be tackling the Islamist terrorists, an odd analogy.
If an Orwellian dystopia is what we're otherwise expected to suffer under, then let them burn it all down for all I care.
2 Likes #36
moneysavingkitten
The article doesn't mention Samsung at all davewave. Which privacy issue should law abiding people be more concerned with. The one you are alluding to, or the one mentioned in the article?
Plenty of other publications do though, including the Mirror and the Independent! Your Samsung smart TVs can be used as a covert microphone! ;)
#37
IT wasn't too long ago that half of the U.K. Secret service were Soviet spies. Most of them somehow managed to escape, presumably with the assistance of others who didn't get caught. Ordinary people aren't the only ones spied on and since blackmail is far cheaper than bribery, perhaps this explains the antics of our politicians who consistently do things that are detrimental to ordinary citizens.
1 Like #38
haritori
Daddio
It'll be the Amazon Echo next.
One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; Amazon will soon take over here. And I for one welcome our new Amazon overlords. I’d like to remind them that I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground kindle caves.
I think you mean sky 'dungeons' hari
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/29/amazon-plans-for-giant-airship-warehouses-revealed

Just because the cuddly kitten friendly CIA has this tech doesn't mean it can and has been used by 'criminals'
http://www.hotukdeals.com/misc/zombie-army-cctv-cameras-attacks-2532534
The irony there quite deliberate :{

Edited By: thewongwing101 on Mar 08, 2017 17:16
#39
Moonwolf1976
moneysavingkitten
The article doesn't mention Samsung at all davewave. Which privacy issue should law abiding people be more concerned with. The one you are alluding to, or the one mentioned in the article?
Plenty of other publications do though, including the Mirror and the Independent! Your Samsung smart TVs can be used as a covert microphone! ;)

I know. You're entirely missing the point I was making. Who is listening also relevant, not just how.
#40
promithius
The biggest problem is what happens when the CIA/NSA/GCHQ loose control of these tools, or when the crooks find the flaws in systems that these departments dont report.
It's all well and good saying I dont mind them listening in on my mobile, but when some russian teen gets his hands on leaked CIA tools and drains your bank account, you'll soon complain.


Lose control or the crooks find the flaws? Who do you think they are employing, the best hackers don't get trained to do it by a government training course, the governments are relying on the crooks as are large companies.

Post a Comment

You don't need an account to leave a comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.

...OR log in with your social account

...OR comment using your social account

Thanks for your comment! Keep it up!
We just need to have a quick look and it will be live soon.
The community is happy to hear your opinion! Keep contributing!