320°
EXPIRED
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens £109.97 @ Tesco Direct
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens £109.97 @ Tesco Direct

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens £109.97 @ Tesco Direct

Buy forBuy forBuy for£109.97
GETGet dealVisit site and get deal
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens, great price for the USM version. (currently £249 @ Jessops and £229 @ warehouse express)

Free cleaning kit worth £4.97

33 Comments

Crap lens, you'll be crying if you buy this, get the 55-250 canon IS lens instead, its only a few quid more.

I agree with mikeleslie, the 55-250 is a belter, and it's got a 4 stop image stabilizer.
Read reviews of both and then decide.

PS. I did vote hot as it's a good price.
Edited by: "inspectorblakey" 22nd Jun 2011

Good price, but agree with above.

it is an 'ok' price. you can get it on ebay for about the same. but, it's a crap lens. i'm a fan of the 18-200 canon is which goes for about $500 and is extremely versatile.

Nice price, unsure about the quality of this lens however, but gotta be good as a starter zoom lens.

Thanks for the info guys.
What you think if the 16-85 ?

Not Tesco's after the 60D debacle (!)
I've voted hot as already have it.
Only tend to use it with mono/tri-pod.

sold this lens in favour of the Sigma 70 - 300 DG APO Macro
but they both need a tripod for anything but bright sunlight.

This is not a bad lens, and for the money, its superb. Yes the 55-250 is better, but the extra 50mm makes this one a winner for shooting far away!

The 55-250mm with 4 stop IS currently £154 at Tesco Direct - brilliant lens for the price, use mostly for portraits.
>> direct.tesco.com/q/R…spx

not a bad price, but better the 55-250mm is a much better lens.
No IS so you would need a tripod, etc. - personally I'd look at the
2nd hand market for the little use it may get. Those serious about
shooting 300mm would only find this as a stop gap until you decide
for an L

aircanman

This is not a bad lens, and for the money, its superb. Yes the 55-250 is … This is not a bad lens, and for the money, its superb. Yes the 55-250 is better, but the extra 50mm makes this one a winner for shooting far away!



Blurry images or walk 20% closer, I know which I'd prefer.

If you know about photography you don't get blurry images....Anyway that is not a bad price for an usm lens....and 55-250mm lens is better lens than this....

mikeleslie

Blurry images or walk 20% closer, I know which I'd prefer.


mikeleslie

Blurry images or walk 20% closer, I know which I'd prefer.



Agreed, or crop also!

Soft as dog do when wide open. Perfectly adequate when not. I've taken probably 10k shots with one of these. Paid £65 from a mate though so mustn't grumble. Looking to replace with the 55-250 now.

Good price, nearly posted this myself a couple of days ago, but read the reviews first. It's cheap, and cheap for a reason. Image quality referred to as mediocre.

the-digital-picture.com/Rev…spx

Worth a look.

Junk lens, don't waste your money.

Go for the 55-250mm instead.

Sometimes you can't walk closer and have a tripod and can shoot at f8, then it's ok ish
but the bottom line is that it's a cheap lens at a great price for the budget sensitive
still hot

Dunno if these are still available or not as the site is down but might be a better bet if you can suffer the loss of 100mm but gain OS

hotukdeals.com/dea…456
Edited by: "Rich44" 23rd Jun 2011

I have to agree with everyone who favours the 55-250mm over this - well worth the extra.

Get this 75-300mm and I guarantee you will be disappointed....

I have the 55-250 is, but this deal still voted hot as its a great price, roughly 20quid cheaper than even ebay.

I have one of these lenses, bought about 6 years ago when I got my EOS300D .. it's a crap lens! In very bright light (eg. outdoors, daytime, bright day) you can get decentish shots, still not with much contrast. Anything else - forget it! It also weighs 500g it's a pain to lug about, and the wide end 75mm is still a telephoto (especially once you factor in the 1.6x crop) so not useful for anything else.

This is a good price for this lens, and as such, I've voted hot. However, as others have suggested, the 55-250mm *is* a better lens, and if I were in the market for a telephoto zoom, I'd very much try to justify the extra £50 on that one.

Don't forget the 70-300 is an EF lens.
The 55-250 is an EF-S.

So for a DSLR you're probably going to get around 100-450 out of it and only 55-250 out of the EF-S. (for those confused, you get a bit more zoom for your money)
(If I remember rightly it's a *1.6 on zoom from EF -> EF-S???)

I have an EF 70-300 IS on a DSLR and at maximum zoom it can be a bit soft.
I never noticed the gap in zooms between the 18-55 EF-S and the 70-300 EF you can compensate for that with a short walk.

max_lan

Don't forget the 70-300 is an EF lens.The 55-250 is an EF-S.So for a DSLR … Don't forget the 70-300 is an EF lens.The 55-250 is an EF-S.So for a DSLR you're probably going to get around 100-450 out of it and only 55-250 out of the EF-S. (for those confused, you get a bit more zoom for your money)(If I remember rightly it's a *1.6 on zoom from EF -> EF-S???)I have an EF 70-300 IS on a DSLR and at maximum zoom it can be a bit soft.I never noticed the gap in zooms between the 18-55 EF-S and the 70-300 EF you can compensate for that with a short walk.



the 70-300mm is a different and much better lens than the 75-300 (and 55-250), don't mix them up.

This lens sucks. Get a 55-250 IS for £150~. This lens is worth, at most, around £75 and frankly should be discontinued.

max_lan

Don't forget the 70-300 is an EF lens.The 55-250 is an EF-S.So for a DSLR … Don't forget the 70-300 is an EF lens.The 55-250 is an EF-S.So for a DSLR you're probably going to get around 100-450 out of it and only 55-250 out of the EF-S. (for those confused, you get a bit more zoom for your money)



Canon doesn't calculate in crop factors. All focal lengths are the full frame equivalents be it an EF or EF-S lens. So both the 70-300 and 55-250 will get a 1.6 multiplier on a APS-C camera.

So the 55-250 will be 88-400, and the 70-300 will be 112-480 relative to a full frame camera. The reason a lot of people think that Canon do this on their EF-S line is because Nikon does...

Canon decided a long time ago to use the same scale on both so they can be easily compared. You know that a X-Y lens can be 1:1 compared to any other X-Y lens no matter what the lens frame.

If you want a cheap zoom, get the 55-250, if you want an EF 70-300, then get the new (Dec' 2010) Tamron SP 70-300 VC. It is a far more modern, and frankly better, lens than the Canon 70-300 IS. All three lenses are better than this hori-bad 75-300, which you'll find in the clearance bins at most photography stores.

I have the 55-250 and it's fab - would recommend paying a bit extra (£157 on Amazon).
I had to buy a new one because I had problems with my Sigma EF lens - the camera (550D) kept complaining that there was a fault communicating with the lens, which works perfectly well on my old EOS650. Anyone else had problems with EF lenses? Though to be honest I was glad for an excuse to ditch the old clunker.

Cold. £103.35 at Amazon.

ashok

If you know about photography you don't get blurry images....Anyway that … If you know about photography you don't get blurry images....Anyway that is not a bad price for an usm lens....and 55-250mm lens is better lens than this....



If you know about photography you wouldn't buy this lens.

I'm confused, which lens is better?

qwerta369

Cold. £103.35 at … Cold. £103.35 at [url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.co.uk%2FCanon-75-300mm-4-0-5-6-III-Lens%2Fdp%2FB00005K47Y%2Fref%3Dsr_1_2%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Delectronics%26qid%3D1308827454%26sr%3D8-2]Amazon[/url].




That's a different lens without USM, a much nastier lens all together, this USM one is far better

qwerta369

Cold. £103.35 at … Cold. £103.35 at [url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.co.uk%2FCanon-75-300mm-4-0-5-6-III-Lens%2Fdp%2FB00005K47Y%2Fref%3Dsr_1_2%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Delectronics%26qid%3D1308827454%26sr%3D8-2]Amazon[/url].



My appologies, Amazon is very confusing

The lens is described as "Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III Lens " ie no USM
But the image shows a USM model

Hmmm I don't know what Amazon are selling.

I'd guess they would sent you the cheaper "Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III" rather than the "Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM" and claim the photo is for illustration purposes only ?

It's a bit sloppy
Edited by: "gmcoates" 24th Jun 2011
Post a comment
Avatar
@
    Text