Get a free Heinz Caddy containing
Classic Barbecue Sauce 220ml
Seriously Good Mayonaise 220ml
Yellow Mustard 220ml
Sweet Chilli 220ml
Fill in the details, Make up a business name, use Morning Advertiser as Distributer
Classic Barbecue Sauce 220ml
Seriously Good Mayonaise 220ml
Yellow Mustard 220ml
Sweet Chilli 220ml
Fill in the details, Make up a business name, use Morning Advertiser as Distributer
Edit: Have a confirmation email saying they will ship it, so maybe
I got it sent to my work, so it's a real company too...
I'm stuck for that one too, help needed guys
Read the OP all the info is there...
Done that and thanks
Whats OP??
Read the post description
Yeh because pubs are on the same line as food banks joker
You know the majority of people who use foodbanks aren't homeless, right?
Then change "homeless" to "low income". What difference does it make? Find a grammatical error if you're the type that believes these things invalidate the point.
So what's your threshold where it becomes okay? Fight for your right... to cheat a company out of four small condiments? Why not some ketchup packets as well, who knows how daring teenage life can get.
At any rate, I don't think you're following. My main objection is that petty fraud is *always* an option. Freebie: Hide a Mars Bar in your coat pocket at WHSmith. Well yes, obviously. Or a Bounty. Or Snickers. Submitting these things is unnecessary clutter. It's irritating to open a deal to find it's not a deal at all, just a con that could apply, broadly, to anything at any time.
Grow up.
This is a terrible argument and I think you're misunderstanding why Heinz are offering this. It's not charity and it's not out of the goodness of their hearts. They're a multi million pound corporation trying to expand their business further. They'll offer this free sample to a business in the hopes that they will want to use them as their condiment supplier. The loss they make is very deliberate and is purely to make more money going forward which is completely fine because, hey, that's business. You can still argue that it is morally wrong for people to take advantage but it is in no way comparable to defrauding a charity.
What invalidates your point is making the assumption on members of this site's lifestyles.
You'd suspect quite a lot of members are tight up for cash (I was when I started using it) and are looking for a cheaper way to get by.
It's not your position to judge or shame people.
The food bank may ask for a proof of address!!
You scoundrels have probably bled them dry by now. However, I've applied. Thanks.