Glenlivet 18 Year Old Scotch Whisky, 70 cl £63 @ Amazon
-147°

Glenlivet 18 Year Old Scotch Whisky, 70 cl £63 @ Amazon

5
5 Comments

I picked 4 bottles of this up at Tesco for £20 each a couple of years ago. That was cheap! Decent at this price though for now.

Fairly poor price for Amazon really. It's been cheaper for most of the last 2 years.

I suggest you look up Amazon products on camelcamelcamel to confirm it's a special price before posting them here:
uk.camelcamelcamel.com/Gle…XX4

Well thankyou for posting the deal. Whilst it might not be the cheapest ever you have highlighted an aged whisky at in this day and age a reasonable price. And if people are not agreeing hopefully they will post some better deals and then we may benefit. I give you heat!!

Biggushlong3 h, 19 m ago

Well thankyou for posting the deal. Whilst it might not be the cheapest …Well thankyou for posting the deal. Whilst it might not be the cheapest ever you have highlighted an aged whisky at in this day and age a reasonable price. And if people are not agreeing hopefully they will post some better deals and then we may benefit. I give you heat!!


We're not downvoting it out of spite, we're downvoting it because it's not a good deal. This is a deal site, isn't it? Do you really want the site swamped in bad deals that we give heat anyway just for the sake of not hurting anyone's feelings? Is heat now a participation award? I think it's more useful to explain to newbies if what they've posted isn't a good deal and why not, rather than just pretending it was good.

In this case, it's not just "not the cheapest ever", it's more expensive than usual. The relative value of the whisky at this price to other similarly aged whiskys is irrelevant - the fact is you can usually buy this whisky for less, so why would you pay this much?

I don't mean to sound harsh here btw, please don't take offense or think I'm trying to start an argument with you, I'm just explaining my viewpoint, and it's apparently the same viewpoint shared by the majority since this has been voted pretty cold.

Original Poster

DancingOmelette32 m ago

We're not downvoting it out of spite, we're downvoting it because it's not …We're not downvoting it out of spite, we're downvoting it because it's not a good deal. This is a deal site, isn't it? Do you really want the site swamped in bad deals that we give heat anyway just for the sake of not hurting anyone's feelings? Is heat now a participation award? I think it's more useful to explain to newbies if what they've posted isn't a good deal and why not, rather than just pretending it was good.In this case, it's not just "not the cheapest ever", it's more expensive than usual. The relative value of the whisky at this price to other similarly aged whiskys is irrelevant - the fact is you can usually buy this whisky for less, so why would you pay this much?I don't mean to sound harsh here btw, please don't take offense or think I'm trying to start an argument with you, I'm just explaining my viewpoint, and it's apparently the same viewpoint shared by the majority since this has been voted pretty cold.

Thanks for your comment. To be honest I don't even know the prices of these things. Just saw some going for over 200 and though wow! But I was explained about the different technuiqes used. For sure I won't be posting deals I don't know about in the future

I appreciate your comment though. Have a great day
Post a comment

Deal posting newbie! This is ismail_allam-102517956494097512806 first deal post. Help out by leaving a posting tip or just to show your appreciation for their contribution.

Avatar
@
    Text