Just a reminder as I saw this over a month ago now on here, these are branded cables that carry HDMI and Ethernet - ideal for future proofing your AV setup.
Just arrived at my local in Nuneaton and weren't available when last posted on here, so may be worth a check!
Just arrived at my local in Nuneaton and weren't available when last posted on here, so may be worth a check!
Groups
This is what I find. Different areas have the items at different times so a reminder is always worthy
profiles...just launched,delivery 3-4 weeks from taiwan,dispatch from hong kong 25 days! oO
nah,sooner go to 99p store
There is two for 89p that ship from the UK. I however noticed they do not have ethernet so removed my post before you posted.
And wow , what a risk 89p cant risk buying from someone without a review for 89p. You must live in a bubble.
A foole & his money,
be soone at debate:
which after with sorow,
repents him to late.
The more expensive the cable the better the picture! Ignore all the idiots who say its a digital signal so it doesn't matter, it does! Cheap cables are only limited to passing digital 1's and zeros. Expensive ones can pass the 3's and 4's needed for 3D.
Nice
LOL I use HDMI 1.4 cables that I got off of Amazon from the UK for under £2. 3D works perfectly fine and never had problems with the picture quality or interference using the cables. I would never be a sucker and pay more for a HDMI cable.
haha... good one... for money well spend....give £89 to charity and the buy this one...
LOL!!!!!
ITS DIGITAL
It either works or it doesn't .. it's not giving you give you rounder 0's or straighter ones - accepted the better cables are marginally better .. not that you will notice
LMAO!
First... the cheap cables are usualy up to 75 MHz and the expensive ones are up to 340 MHz so there is some sense in buying the little more expensive cable if you have really expensive equipment at home, but you'll personally not see the difference even if you really try!
Second... could you PLEASE explain the "Expensive ones can pass the 3's and 4's" part? Maybe I've misunderstood but since when digital signal have those? :-D
Wow. Someone really took the PC World sales spiel to heart!
Voted hot, great price!
Didn't realise you were joking until I read the last line, haha :p. Sadly others won't realise...
Yep, basically an AV receiver can accept the internet connection via Ethernet, and then if shared accross to Smart TV, Sky Box , Blu Ray players etc, each individual unit won't require its own connection as it can take it through the HDMI cables direct from the AV receiver.
Means less wires in the long run if you have a lot of these things - wouldn't be surprised if Consoles couldn't use this - wired is usually a better connection that wireless
Genuinely interested as opposed to trying to put anyone down as I've not found much info with this up and running anywhere.
So it turns out, much to my surprise and previous experience, that slightly the more expensive cables do seem to make a difference albeit only when using a switcher box. And even then we're still talking sub-£10 vs £1 cables and definitely not the silly prices charged in PC World etc!
I think the point is thought that if they work then a 99p cable and a £100 cable are gonna give the exact same picture/sound. I would agree though that if you need a long run or are going through switchers/splitters and run into problems with the cheapest quality cable it's worth trying a slightly better one. Better cables can be less fussy but if a 99p cable is working with no problems then no amount of cash spent on a better one is gonna make a difference.