Jumanji: Welcome To The Jungle [2017] £5.99 on Amazon Prime (non-prime +£2.99)
297°Expired

Jumanji: Welcome To The Jungle [2017] £5.99 on Amazon Prime (non-prime +£2.99)

14
Found 23rd Jun
Cheap for a recent release DVD and it's a fun movie starring The Rock and Jack Black as Bethany.
Community Updates

Groups

Top comments
sam_of_london6 m ago

Saw for £1.99 on Amazon.4K


Yes you did.......to rent and that promotion is no longer on this movie.
Edited by: "feed_me_chocs" 23rd Jun
14 Comments
34116547-MJFw5.jpg
Saw for £1.99 on Amazon.4K
Edited by: "sam_of_london" 23rd Jun
sam_of_london6 m ago

Saw for £1.99 on Amazon.4K


Yes you did.......to rent and that promotion is no longer on this movie.
Edited by: "feed_me_chocs" 23rd Jun
sam_of_london3 m ago

Saw for £1.99 on Amazon.4K


could you give a link please? I would definitely buy at that price!

As to this deal it's just ok IMHO bearing in mind DVD is a old format at this stage and doesn't display that great on modern TVs, it's resolution was made to match the old tube TVs most of us have abandoned long ago...
jcrider1 m ago

Link please...


He's talking rubbish
ST31234 h, 12 m ago

could you give a link please? I would definitely buy at that price!As to …could you give a link please? I would definitely buy at that price!As to this deal it's just ok IMHO bearing in mind DVD is a old format at this stage and doesn't display that great on modern TVs, it's resolution was made to match the old tube TVs most of us have abandoned long ago...


jcrider2 h, 27 m ago

Link please...

amazon.co.uk/gp/…5J9 £13.99 4K
johnwillowlfc40 m ago

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/video/detail/B07C3565J9 £13.99 4K


So, not the £1.99 Sam said then
jcrider15 m ago

So, not the £1.99 Sam said then


I think they meant rent for £1.99 as the word 'saw' was used rather than purchased.
IronGlaive19 m ago

I think they meant rent for £1.99 as the word 'saw' was used rather than …I think they meant rent for £1.99 as the word 'saw' was used rather than purchased.


great, where?

I guess it boils down to interpretation and insinuation. The thread is about a purchase, therefore its reasonable to think a flippant '£1.99' comment is related to a purchase. However, you 'think' they meant a rental for £1.99, but a rental would have nothing to do with this thread.

It seems to me that this is yet more of sam's usual flippant, ill informed dribble again misinforming readers.

(I hasten to add, its not a pop at you IronGlaive as I'm sure you meant well)
Edited by: "jcrider" 23rd Jun
jcrider14 m ago

great, where?


Google it
IronGlaive2 m ago

Google it


No need. Its doesn't exist (I updated my earlier comment btw)
Edited by: "jcrider" 24th Jun
Good deal OP
'It seems to me that this is yet more of sam's usual flippant, ill informed dribble again misinforming readers'
l put him on ignore, it saves having to look at the said dribble
Edited by: "Peggotty" 24th Jun
jcrider10 h, 47 m ago

great, where?I guess it boils down to interpretation and insinuation. … great, where?I guess it boils down to interpretation and insinuation. The thread is about a purchase, therefore its reasonable to think a flippant '£1.99' comment is related to a purchase. However, you 'think' they meant a rental for £1.99, but a rental would have nothing to do with this thread.It seems to me that this is yet more of sam's usual flippant, ill informed dribble again misinforming readers.(I hasten to add, its not a pop at you IronGlaive as I'm sure you meant well)



Thats not problem, I didn't take anything by it. I personally simply read then re-read comments and then try to work out what I think what meant...then reply accordingly. If I often didn't do this....it would seem as if nearly everything I read is counter productive or in spite to get attention lol. However, I wasn't aware the particular user is known for cryptic or miseadling replies from what seems to be known by others.
Post a comment
Avatar
@
    Text