Nikon 55-200MM F4.5-5.6 AF-S VR DX Black Lens now £144.99 Delivered @ Amazon
272°Expired

Nikon 55-200MM F4.5-5.6 AF-S VR DX Black Lens now £144.99 Delivered @ Amazon

£144.99
27
Found 5th Aug 2010Made hot 6th Aug 2010
* High-performance 3.6x zoom lens designed specifically for use with Nikon
digital SLR sensors
* Vibration Reduction (VR) stabilization system enables more flexible hand-held
shooting
* Nikon's exclusive SWM (Silent Wave Motor) for fast, precise, and super-quiet
autofocus
* ED glass and aspherical lens elements minimize chromatic aberration,
astigmatism, and other forms of distortion

Nikon lens @ great price

27 Comments

Good price voted hot even though im a Canon owner oO

Cheaper on this link at amazon only £140.95 delivered

Your text here

Due to shopofhorrors123 pointing out that a different Amazon Seller is selling the same lens at a lower price then this has gotta get a cold one from me! Sorry... And I'm a Nikon DSLR user!
http://www.outdoortravelhumor.com/camera-smiley.jpg
Edited by: "Blasphemous" 5th Aug 2010

Blasphemous

Due to shopofhorrors123 pointing out that a different Amazon Seller is … Due to shopofhorrors123 pointing out that a different Amazon Seller is selling the same lens at a lower price then this has gotta get a cold one from me! Sorry... And I'm a Nikon DSLR user!



Mmm... the posted lens is delivered by amazon. The "cheaper" marketplace seller would not be allowed here on Hot UK. So, the best offer for HotUK members is the posted lens for £144.99.

Also, if you have "prime" (next day) delivery, you cannot use it on the (cheaper) marketplace offer.

Therefore HOT from me

pet2000

Mmm... the posted lens is delivered by amazon. The "cheaper" marketplace … Mmm... the posted lens is delivered by amazon. The "cheaper" marketplace seller would not be allowed here on Hot UK. So, the best offer for HotUK members is the posted lens for £144.99.Also, if you have "prime" (next day) delivery, you cannot use it on the (cheaper) marketplace offer.Therefore HOT from me

'Allowed HERE' is the important bit. Personally I couldn't give a monkeys chuff what HUKDs thinks should and shouldn't be allowed. I voted on the PRICE and that is what this place is all about.

Bought one of these off good seller on eBay today for £129.50 free delivery but i collected it myself from Canary Wharf - one year warranty etc

If you can afford it I'd recommend you spring for a 70-300mm VR...beast of a lens, and gives more reach than this lens.

A few months ago, these where £200+ everywhere, mind you a year before that they where £150 which is what it is worth really. I have one and it takes good pics when it doesn't mis-focus which it does quite often.

Basically, this is very hot for what it is. It is back to a sensible price and from a decent retailer. Warehouse Express are charging £240 still!

Banned

Thanks!

This is scorching.

Cold, got mine alot cheaper on ebay.

Triggster

Cold, got mine alot cheaper on ebay.



Get a grip.

Boopop

If you can afford it I'd recommend you spring for a 70-300mm VR...beast … If you can afford it I'd recommend you spring for a 70-300mm VR...beast of a lens, and gives more reach than this lens.



Hardly a reasonable comparison though. Three times the price, massively heavier and with an effective 'wide' end of 100mm.

I'd say if you're offering an option, the 18-200 would be a better one.

Sadly, as a D700 owner, I'm a bit of a lens snob these days, and if it's not f2.8 or better through the range, then I avoid it.

stonebear

I have one and it takes good pics when it doesn't mis-focus which it … I have one and it takes good pics when it doesn't mis-focus which it does quite often. Basically, this is very hot for what it is. It is back to a sensible price and from a decent retailer.



Sorry, but how can you possibly consider a lens 'hot' if it often fails to focus properly? I'd suggest that either (a) you haven't mastered the basics of your camera yet, or (b) your lens is faulty and should be returned.

londislagerhound

Hardly a reasonable comparison though. Three times the price, massively … Hardly a reasonable comparison though. Three times the price, massively heavier and with an effective 'wide' end of 100mm.I'd say if you're offering an option, the 18-200 would be a better one.Sadly, as a D700 owner, I'm a bit of a lens snob these days, and if it's not f2.8 or better through the range, then I avoid it.



I have gone another route, cos of money, lol.

I have manual lenses that cost buttons and are just as sharp as the best current auto lenses that cost thousands. I realise that taking manual pics is a hassle though, lol.

Liddle ol' me

Sorry, but how can you possibly consider a lens 'hot' if it often fails … Sorry, but how can you possibly consider a lens 'hot' if it often fails to focus properly? I'd suggest that either (a) you haven't mastered the basics of your camera yet, or (b) your lens is faulty and should be returned.



The 55-200mmVR mis-focussing is well known.

I said it was hot "for what it is".

In which case, I should add a (c): sell that lens!

Liddle ol' me

In which case, I should add a (c): sell that lens!



Yea. I should. :-) I have taken good shots with it tho. If your subject is very contrasty it works fine. It is very good for portraits. For action shots, it is hit and miss. I can't use my manual stuff for action.

I see where you're coming from now. This is a slow lens - at a maximum aperture of f/4.5, it shouldn't be expected to capture action.

As for mf lenses, if you pre-focus (admittedly a pain in the ass), you can capture great action shots. Although my 70-200mm f/2.8 is the lens of choice for sports action, I've surprised myself with what I could capture with a manual focus Nikon 135mm f/2.8. It's hard work, but it can be done if the 70-200mm has been left at home

Liddle ol' me

I see where you're coming from now. This is a slow lens - at a maximum … I see where you're coming from now. This is a slow lens - at a maximum aperture of f/4.5, it shouldn't be expected to capture action. As for mf lenses, if you pre-focus (admittedly a pain in the ass), you can capture great action shots. Although my 70-200mm f/2.8 is the lens of choice for sports action, I've surprised myself with what I could capture with a manual focus Nikon 135mm f/2.8. It's hard work, but it can be done if the 70-200mm has been left at home




Yea, it is very much a consumer lens. I have taken portrait type shots with a £20, 40 year old manual lens that blows this away....but manually doing everything isn't always possible. At least with this lens if you shoot a lot of pics you stand a good chance of getting one or two good shots.

londislagerhound

Hardly a reasonable comparison though. Three times the price, massively … Hardly a reasonable comparison though. Three times the price, massively heavier and with an effective 'wide' end of 100mm.I'd say if you're offering an option, the 18-200 would be a better one.Sadly, as a D700 owner, I'm a bit of a lens snob these days, and if it's not f2.8 or better through the range, then I avoid it.



The 18-200mm? But most people will have an 18-XXmm already as their kit lens, so the 18-200mm would make their kit lens redundant. Added to which the 18-200 is an all rounder so makes compromises. I wasn't saying the 70-300mm VR is a cheap buy, but it's certainly a better buy.

stonebear

Get a grip.



£144.99
-
£129.50
= £15.49 saving.

Therefore this deal is cold and you can 'get a grip'.
Edited by: "Triggster" 7th Aug 2010

there are loads of shops selling it for around 150£ on amazon. is it such a great deal when everybody does it?

Got mine off eBay £128.95 2 weeks ago, great bit off kit for not a lot of money

including a 5 year warranty - £140 from Friday 13th August

camerabox.co.uk/pro…643
Edited by: "paolo" 8th Aug 2010

paolo

including a 5 year warranty - £140 from Friday 13th … including a 5 year warranty - £140 from Friday 13th Augusthttp://www.camerabox.co.uk/productDA1.asp?ProductName=Nikon-55-200mm-F4-5.6G-VR-AF-S-DX-IF-ED&ProductID=2643



this looks to be a different model:
hotukdeals.com/mis…279
Post a comment
Avatar
@
    Text