397°Expired

Sharp 32 Inch LC-32CHF4041K HD Ready LED TV with Freeview HD - £119 @ Tesco Direct

Found 6th Jan 2017

Ok its not full HD and its only 32 inch but for the kids room this seems like a good deal with freeview built in.

Product specifications
Interfaces/Ports

Total HDMI Connections 3
Total Scart Sockets 1
Total USB Ports 2
Total MHL Ports 0
HDMI Standard 1.4
Component Input Y
Ethernet Port Y
Headphone Socket Y
PC Input HDMI
Built-in Devices

Built-in DVD N
Built-in Freeview HD Y
Energy Performance

Energy Efficiency Class A
Power Consumption - Average 31
Screen Size 32 "
Energy Consumption (Annual) 45 kWh/annum
Energy Consumption (On Mode) 31 W
Power

Power Consumption - Standby 0.5W
Dimensions

Viewing Angle (°) 176 degrees
Height With Tabletop Stand (cm) 49.3
Height Without Tabletop Stand (cm) 44.5
Weight With Tabletop Stand (kg) 4.7
Weight Without Tabletop Stand (kg) 4.5
Sound

Total Audio Power Output (Watts RMS) 20W
Digital Audio Output Yes - optical
Display & Graphics

Maximum Resolution 1366x768
Type LED TV
Screen Type Flat
HD Ready / Full HD / Ultra HD HD Ready
Key Information

Colour Black
3D

3D Ready N
Variant

Colour Black
Features

Electronic Programme Guide 7
Wall-mountable Y
DLNA Compliant N
Miracast N
Tuner Freeview HD
Smart / Internet TV N
WiDi N

Read more at tesco.com/dir…prd

Post Share

New Comment Save for later

Groups

Audiovisual100713 deals

26 Comments

6th Jan 2017

Link goes nowhere.

6th Jan 2017

http://www.tesco.com/direct/sharp-32-inch-lc-32chf4041k-hd-ready-led-tv-with-freeview-hd/657-7904.prd?source=others
See if that works.

Meh........tried loads - link still u/s...I give up.

Edited by: "Copperface" 6th Jan 2017

Original Poster

6th Jan 2017

link works for me and the link you posted does too, strange.

is it working for anyone else?

6th Jan 2017

Links work fine

6th Jan 2017

heat.

6th Jan 2017

Thanks OP. Went for one for the bedroom. Will do the trick.

6th Jan 2017

Is this a re-badge job?

6th Jan 2017

hammeredpizza
Is this a re-badge job?

Who cares, good specs for the price

6th Jan 2017

I brought this for 149 and it's great for bedroom

6th Jan 2017

yulu91
Who cares, good specs for the price

Just in terms of failure rate - it's between this and the 1080p Samsung for £179.99 from Currys / PC World for me.

6th Jan 2017

hammeredpizza
Just in terms of failure rate - it's between this and the 1080p Samsung … Just in terms of failure rate - it's between this and the 1080p Samsung for £179.99 from Currys / PC World for me.

Oh £179.99, 50% more expensive than this, not really comparable.

6th Jan 2017

yulu91
Oh £179.99, 50% more expensive than this, not really comparable.

Also has 100% more pixels, so it potentially justifies the additional cost there.

6th Jan 2017

hammeredpizza
Also has 100% more pixels, so it potentially justifies the additional … Also has 100% more pixels, so it potentially justifies the additional cost there.

OK yes you can even spend a few hundred pound more to get 4K resolution, larger size, smart functions, 3D...blablabla
By all means post that Samsung one you mentioned if you think it's a deal. Otherwise this post is about a budget TV which is a good deal for the price.

6th Jan 2017

My mother in law has this TV. It has a decent picture, but the sound on these Sharp's are terrible. Expect to have to buy speakers/a soundbar or put up with very tinny sound.

6th Jan 2017

Hot

6th Jan 2017

hammeredpizza
Is this a re-badge job?

Indeed it is

Original Poster

6th Jan 2017

hammeredpizza
Is this a re-badge job?

At this price I would say so, don't know which but I'm sure someone will be able to say.

Banned

6th Jan 2017

hammeredpizza
Just in terms of failure rate - it's between this and the 1080p Samsung … Just in terms of failure rate - it's between this and the 1080p Samsung for £179.99 from Currys / PC World for me.

go for the Samsung, the software is abominable on this set- so laggy, will drive you nuts

6th Jan 2017

poison3k
link works for me and the link you posted does too, strange.is it working … link works for me and the link you posted does too, strange.is it working for anyone else?

Aha, worked out that it was Ublock on Firefox relooping it back.
Chrome and FF w/o Ublock all ok - my fault