Small Glitch > £5 off £30/ £10 off £50 lingerie code takes it off Pre-offer Prices on 3 for 2 Items @ M&S
193°Expired

Small Glitch > £5 off £30/ £10 off £50 lingerie code takes it off Pre-offer Prices on 3 for 2 Items @ M&S

Mod & Ed 17
Mod & Ed
Found 6th Sep 2016Made hot 7th Sep 2016
M&S has a code that takes £5 off £30 / £10 off £50 Spend on lingerie at the moment (BRAFIT), in itself it's not exceptional, but on 3 for 2 or buy 1 Get 1 Half Price lingerie offers it's taking the discount off the Subtotal price before the offer discounts are applied.
So, I added 6 x £6 pairs of knickers, total £36, added code BRAFIT, took it to £31, then the 3 for 2 offer kicked in & it took the basket down to £20.66.
Tested on 9 pairs of £6 knickers, total £54, added code, took the baskey to £44, then 3 for 2 offer kicked in & took the basket to £29.33,
Even better savings can be had on the Buy 1 Get 1 Half Price Cami / Vest tops they have on ie; I added 10 x £6 Vest Tops, total £60, added code, took it to £50, offer kicked in taking the basket to £37.50.
Another example; add 6 x £5 Vest tops, total £30, add code, basket now £25, offer kicks in taking basket to £18.76.

Only a few pounds saved & only really worth it if you want to but multiples of knickers / vest tops or are after M&S lingerie anyway, but thought it worth sharing

17 Comments

So not a glitch then....

Original Poster Mod & Ed

PAULTRD

So not a glitch then....



Yes, because the code should work AFTER the 3 for 2 offers, not before, so the codes are working on baskets that are actually lower than the code criteria, I call that a glitch

wishihadadonkey

Yes, because the code should work AFTER the 3 for 2 offers, not before, … Yes, because the code should work AFTER the 3 for 2 offers, not before, so the codes are working on baskets that are actually lower than the code criteria, I call that a glitch



£36 - £5 = £31. £31 - 1/3 = £20.66 which is correct. it would be a glitch if it were £36 - 1/3 = £24. £24 - £5 = £19.

So much glitching going on here

Original Poster Mod & Ed

PAULTRD

£36 - £5 = £31. £31 - 1/3 = £20.66 which is correct. it would be a glitch … £36 - £5 = £31. £31 - 1/3 = £20.66 which is correct. it would be a glitch if it were £36 - 1/3 = £24. £24 - £5 = £19.




As above, the code SHOULD NOT work on sub totals, it should work after the 3 for 2 discount is applied ie 6 x £36 = £36 - £12 = £24 - code should not work as basket total is BELOW the £30 spend threshold.

Thanks for taking the time to check out the offer, it's appreciated

No pictures

https://media0.giphy.com/media/xTk9ZOLgUNKlF82JvW/giphy.gif

I really appreciate the time you go to with all your posts thank you

change title to "smalls" glitch

Very useful...got some nice combinations

I'm sure Louise minchin wears m&s undies she looked amazing this morning on BBC breakfast

She could pummel me in to submission..............:|

LOUGHBORO GUY

I'm sure Louise minchin wears m&s undies she looked amazing this morning … I'm sure Louise minchin wears m&s undies she looked amazing this morning on BBC breakfast


She's no Susanna Reid. It's funny, I never missed my alarm the mornings she was on.

Holeinone

She's no Susanna Reid. It's funny, I never missed my alarm the mornings … She's no Susanna Reid. It's funny, I never missed my alarm the mornings she was on.


I agree but leggy Louise would look lovely in black hold ups and suspenders

Same goes for leggy Sally Nugent

LOUGHBORO GUY

I'm sure Louise minchin wears m&s undies she looked amazing this morning … I'm sure Louise minchin wears m&s undies she looked amazing this morning on BBC breakfast



Doesn't do it for me I'm afraid...

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1681291/images/o-LOUISE-MINCHIN-facebook.jpg

I wish real girls, like you actually meet, had tummies like the main top model. I normally find it is something you can snuggle up against as an alternative to breasts, but have to admit the tight tummy does look good

good value
Post a comment
Avatar
@
    Text