Split (Blu-ray) £4.49 (Prime) £6.48 (Non Prime) @ Amazon
595°Expired

Split (Blu-ray) £4.49 (Prime) £6.48 (Non Prime) @ Amazon

40
Found 23rd Jan
Good price for this psycological horror from M. Night Shyamalan, starring James McAvoy.
Community Updates

Groups

Top comments
Part of me likes this film......
40 Comments
Part of me likes this film......
Avatar
deleted199509
Great movie, great price, hot.
Dammit, knew this would happen, paid £6 in Fopp last week. Good film, great price. Looking forward to seeing the next one, hope Shyamalan doesn't drop the ball...
Great film. Love ***** ***** ** the end. Not too sure about the wall crawling bit but I'll forgive that for the Hedwig dance scene.
Edited by: "AgentDaleCooper" 24th Jan
One of the worst films I've ever seen. I think only The Snowman beat it from last year.
sparc3 m ago

One of the worst films I've ever seen. I think only The Snowman beat it …One of the worst films I've ever seen. I think only The Snowman beat it from last year.


Didn't you like the rendition of "We're walking in the air" ?
Harefoot2 m ago

Didn't you like the rendition of "We're walking in the air" ?


Oh was that what Val Kilmer was saying? I couldn't understand him.
Great film.
Editor
Loved this movie, great price, thanks @m3racer123
Liked it up until the end, when it got too ridiculous for me. Clearly set it up for a sequel.
I like James McAvoy. He’s good people.
xenophon1 h, 36 m ago

Liked it up until the end, when it got too ridiculous for me. Clearly set …Liked it up until the end, when it got too ridiculous for me. Clearly set it up for a sequel.



Same here!! I was really enjoying it, thought it was great - but that ending ruined it for me!
This isnt the awful film about him having 20 personalities isit?
Avatar
deleted800342
sparc16 h, 47 m ago

One of the worst films I've ever seen. I think only The Snowman beat it …One of the worst films I've ever seen. I think only The Snowman beat it from last year.


Might be every one of my top ten worst films too.
Rubbish movie IMO
Avatar
deleted800342
snowtiger15 m ago

Rubbish movie IMO


No need for the IMO, you're 100% correct.
Brilliant film, Shyamalan back on form
Great showcase of how amazing our mind works and its capabilities. Cringingly good acting.
Look after your mental health.
xenophon2 h, 22 m ago

Liked it up until the end, when it got too ridiculous for me. Clearly set …Liked it up until the end, when it got too ridiculous for me. Clearly set it up for a sequel.


I thought it was set up for a sequel perfectly, can't wait to see what happens with you know who involved!
This guy has a lot of personality (s)
Haha I can see why this film is drawing mixed reviews. I loved the concept and McAvoy's portrayal of multiple characters, but couldn't stand the dippy / weak females making bad choices and a couple of unreal bits towards the end where a character climbs a wall and bends iron bars. Looking past the short-lived frustrations though, this is worth a watch.
carlos777uk20 m ago

Haha I can see why this film is drawing mixed reviews. I loved the …Haha I can see why this film is drawing mixed reviews. I loved the concept and McAvoy's portrayal of multiple characters, but couldn't stand the dippy / weak females making bad choices and a couple of unreal bits towards the end where a character climbs a wall and bends iron bars. Looking past the short-lived frustrations though, this is worth a watch.


The superhero powers are covered in the movie "Unbreakable"
AgentDaleCooper18 h, 25 m ago

Great film. Love ***** ****** at the end. Not too sure about the wall …Great film. Love ***** ****** at the end. Not too sure about the wall crawling bit but I'll forgive that for the Hedwig dance scene.


Why not just say “love the twist at the end”? You know, for those who don’t know the twist. I thought it was the best part and completely changed my opinion of the film. I hate the way you just throw it out there with no consideration for anyone who may not have seen it
deleted80034224th Jan

No need for the IMO, you're 100% correct.


There is a need for IMO, because duh, it’s his opinion. Why not just agree with him instead of trying to force your opinion as fact.

Bloody hell this website is annoying me this morning lol
Wow, a TERRIBLE film - don't waste your money!
Avatar
deleted800342
Jon7923 m ago

There is a need for IMO, because duh, it’s his opinion. Why not just a …There is a need for IMO, because duh, it’s his opinion. Why not just agree with him instead of trying to force your opinion as fact. Bloody hell this website is annoying me this morning lol


Why take everything so seriously?
Maybe take a break from the internet for a while.
Brilliant film. 79% like it on Rotten Tomatoes, 7.3/10 on IMDB, so we're in the majority I'd say
Jon791 h, 40 m ago

There is a need for IMO, because duh, it’s his opinion. Why not just a …There is a need for IMO, because duh, it’s his opinion. Why not just agree with him instead of trying to force your opinion as fact. Bloody hell this website is annoying me this morning lol


Not just annoying you
AgentDaleCooper23 h, 43 m ago

Great film. Love Bruce Willis at the end. Not too sure about the wall …Great film. Love Bruce Willis at the end. Not too sure about the wall crawling bit but I'll forgive that for the Hedwig dance scene.


Don't be inconsiderate mate, edit your post and consider other people who you'll be spoiling the same surprise for if you don't!
Edited by: "schnide" 24th Jan
s24adm22 m ago

Brilliant film. 79% like it on Rotten Tomatoes, 7.3/10 on IMDB, so we're …Brilliant film. 79% like it on Rotten Tomatoes, 7.3/10 on IMDB, so we're in the majority I'd say


Now hang on a second - X Factor gets millions of viewers but that doesn't mean it's high quality. Rotten Tomatoes doesn't really mean that much and IMDB are user ratings too. Meanwhile, critical reviews, aggregated and weighted on Metacritic are at 62%:

metacritic.com/mov…lit

And given Shyamalan's history after The Village (and some people even hate that) I'll trust critic reviews over the public vote!
Banned
snowtiger4 h, 0 m ago

Rubbish movie IMO


Maybe it is but i enjoyed the storyboard of this movie
schnide1 h, 50 m ago

Now hang on a second - X Factor gets millions of viewers but that doesn't …Now hang on a second - X Factor gets millions of viewers but that doesn't mean it's high quality. Rotten Tomatoes doesn't really mean that much and IMDB are user ratings too. Meanwhile, critical reviews, aggregated and weighted on Metacritic are at 62%:http://www.metacritic.com/movie/splitAnd given Shyamalan's history after The Village (and some people even hate that) I'll trust critic reviews over the public vote!


surely ratings have nothing to do with the amount of viewers?

The link you posted actually has 29 positive reviews, 14 mixed and only 4 negative, that still sounds like more people like it than not to me?
schnide2 h, 12 m ago

Don't be a d**k mate, edit your post and consider other people who you'll …Don't be a d**k mate, edit your post and consider other people who you'll be spoiling the same surprise for if you don't.


A bit strong but I agree and have edited. I was just assuming people who like M Night films and would likely buy it would have seen it already - apologies all round. You cant see but I am expressing an apologetic face to all and sundry
AgentDaleCooper1 h, 10 m ago

A bit strong but I agree and have edited. I was just assuming people who …A bit strong but I agree and have edited. I was just assuming people who like M Night films and would likely buy it would have seen it already - apologies all round. You cant see but I am expressing an apologetic face to all and sundry


You're right, I amended mine too. Many apologies and glad you enjoyed it (I love Unbreakable, personally).
s24adm1 h, 37 m ago

surely ratings have nothing to do with the amount of viewers?The link you …surely ratings have nothing to do with the amount of viewers?The link you posted actually has 29 positive reviews, 14 mixed and only 4 negative, that still sounds like more people like it than not to me?


You can assume that if someone's watching something on TV, it's because they're generally a fan of it as all you have to do is switch off the TV. Same as buying rags like The S*n or The Daily Hatemail. Sure, it's trash but people like it. My point is that just because lots of people consume it, doesn't mean it's good.

And I don't trust the opinions of random voters compared to someone who's well versed in a wide range of movies and has to produce a well-justified review in order to earn a living.
schnide14 h, 14 m ago

You can assume that if someone's watching something on TV, it's because …You can assume that if someone's watching something on TV, it's because they're generally a fan of it as all you have to do is switch off the TV. Same as buying rags like The S*n or The Daily Hatemail. Sure, it's trash but people like it. My point is that just because lots of people consume it, doesn't mean it's good.And I don't trust the opinions of random voters compared to someone who's well versed in a wide range of movies and has to produce a well-justified review in order to earn a living.


I agree on the first point, I never mentioned anything about how many people watched anything, you did in your reply? and your "well-versed people" on that link rated the film generally positive too so I struggle to see the argument?
s24adm2 h, 8 m ago

I agree on the first point, I never mentioned anything about how many …I agree on the first point, I never mentioned anything about how many people watched anything, you did in your reply? and your "well-versed people" on that link rated the film generally positive too so I struggle to see the argument?


Yes I did and I've already explained why once. We don't have approval ratings for TV shows, so therefore we have to assume that large regular audiences of TV shows like those shows. And I'm saying people love them en mass, but it doesn't mean they're good. Same for lots of movies. I don't trust your average movie watcher who doesn't watch a wide range of films. To them, dross is more likely to be considered good.

Critic reviews, who provided a Metacritic lower than the ratings on the sites you chose to put forward, are therefore more trustworthy in my opinion that the meaningless (RT) or public rated (IMDb) approval ratings.

On top of that, Shyamalan is a notoriously bad director on average. Your average moviegoer wouldn't even have heard of him and are more likely to see a film based on marketing. I think it's important to be more discerning with your time and money.
schnide7 m ago

Yes I did and I've already explained why once. We don't have approval …Yes I did and I've already explained why once. We don't have approval ratings for TV shows, so therefore we have to assume that large regular audiences of TV shows like those shows. And I'm saying people love them en mass, but it doesn't mean they're good. Same for lots of movies. I don't trust your average movie watcher who doesn't watch a wide range of films. To them, dross is more likely to be considered good.Critic reviews, who provided a Metacritic lower than the ratings on the sites you chose to put forward, are therefore more trustworthy in my opinion that the meaningless (RT) or public rated (IMDb) approval ratings.On top of that, Shyamalan is a notoriously bad director on average. Your average moviegoer wouldn't even have heard of him and are more likely to see a film based on marketing. I think it's important to be more discerning with your time and money.


*mind blown* I still don't see your point. nothing there contradicts anything of what I said in the first place!?
bones2324th Jan

Same here!! I was really enjoying it, thought it was great - but that …Same here!! I was really enjoying it, thought it was great - but that ending ruined it for me!



But the ending made perfect sense considering what the film was about and as a Shyamalan film.
s24adm25th Jan

*mind blown* I still don't see your point. nothing there contradicts …*mind blown* I still don't see your point. nothing there contradicts anything of what I said in the first place!?



Just because a lot of people like something doesn't mean it's objectively good. I don't think I can put it any plainer and the nuances aren't obviously going in here.

Don't worry about it any further and have a great weekend either way
Post a comment
Avatar
@
    Text