Unfortunately, this deal is no longer valid
The Only Plane in the Sky: The Oral History of 9/11 Kindle Edition £1.99 @ Amazon
181° Expired

The Only Plane in the Sky: The Oral History of 9/11 Kindle Edition £1.99 @ Amazon

15
Posted 17th Sep

This deal is expired. Here are some options that might interest you:

It's on Amazon's daily kindle sale. Only came out a week ago, physical version is £17.
Community Updates

Groups

15 Comments
Purchased - thanks OP!
Thank you
Sister in law was there. Got out. Swears blind she heard explosions before the towers fell.
Good spot OP - bought and heated - looking forward to this once I have finished the Ardennes book I bought off here.
black flag of course - before shale oil.
CaptainSocks17/09/2019 08:06

Sister in law was there. Got out. Swears blind she heard explosions before …Sister in law was there. Got out. Swears blind she heard explosions before the towers fell.


Saw a program recently that suggests the explosions may have been caused by molten aluminium from the plane fuselage pouring through floors after burning for an hour and contacting the gallons of water from the sprinklers, restrooms, kitchenettes etc.
A molten liquid was seen pouring down the side of the building to back this up.
The program was rational and came to the conclusion that all the right chemicals and ingredients found in the building and plane (full of aviation fuel) caused the collapse of both towers.
Occam's razor.
Mr_Rossi17/09/2019 11:20

Saw a program recently that suggests the explosions may have been caused …Saw a program recently that suggests the explosions may have been caused by molten aluminium from the plane fuselage pouring through floors after burning for an hour and contacting the gallons of water from the sprinklers, restrooms, kitchenettes etc.A molten liquid was seen pouring down the side of the building to back this up.The program was rational and came to the conclusion that all the right chemicals and ingredients found in the building and plane (full of aviation fuel) caused the collapse of both towers.Occam's razor.




Could be! That's literally the complete opposite of Occam's Razor though dude. The simpliest explanation is there were bombs, which is of course why so many jump to that.

It's a shame they didn't bother to do a proper investigation study into the causes of the collapse really. Still can't quite get my head around that one.
I was just recommended this, thanks for posting
CaptainSocks17/09/2019 11:44

Could be! That's literally the complete opposite of Occam's Razor though …Could be! That's literally the complete opposite of Occam's Razor though dude. The simpliest explanation is there were bombs, which is of course why so many jump to that. It's a shame they didn't bother to do a proper investigation study into the causes of the collapse really. Still can't quite get my head around that one.


No, the simplest statement is that there were bombs, but that is not an explanation.
Thanks for posting this I prefer audio books to kindle as find it easier to make the time. Has anyone listened to the audio book and recommend? Audible just has few minds of into hard to get a feel.
Mr_Rossi17/09/2019 12:07

No, the simplest statement is that there were bombs, but that is not an …No, the simplest statement is that there were bombs, but that is not an explanation.


Depends on your point of view I guess! A shame all we have are theories because evidence wasn't examined.
CaptainSocks17/09/2019 11:44

Could be! That's literally the complete opposite of Occam's Razor though …Could be! That's literally the complete opposite of Occam's Razor though dude. The simpliest explanation is there were bombs, which is of course why so many jump to that. It's a shame they didn't bother to do a proper investigation study into the causes of the collapse really. Still can't quite get my head around that one.


No, the simplest explanation is that a religious fundamentalist organised for two passenger airlines to be flown into the towers. As he admitted to for the rest of the time that he remained alive.

You should be a bit concerned that you refuse to believe what is at this point irrefutable.
CaptainSocks17/09/2019 13:04

Depends on your point of view I guess! A shame all we have are theories …Depends on your point of view I guess! A shame all we have are theories because evidence wasn't examined.


Have a look at this, an explanation from nearly 8 years ago summed up in the documentary I mentioned.
This is still Occam's razor.
Assuming aluminium was in a molten state. Long time ago I remember reading that the temperature needed to melt metal could not have been achieved by the burning of aeroplane fuel.
CaptainSocks17/09/2019 08:06

Sister in law was there. Got out. Swears blind she heard explosions before …Sister in law was there. Got out. Swears blind she heard explosions before the towers fell.


Such far forward thinking from the bombers to plant the bombs during construction in 1970 and to bide their time for 31 years.
Edited by: "Ricky302" 17th Sep
Post a comment

Deal posting newbie! This is MattR95 first deal post. Help out by leaving a posting tip or just to show your appreciation for their contribution.

Avatar
@
    Text