Unisex (Youths) converse trainers reduced to £12.99 @ M&M Direct more ladies Converse £12.99 plus £4.49 p&p
504°Expired

Unisex (Youths) converse trainers reduced to £12.99 @ M&M Direct more ladies Converse £12.99 plus £4.49 p&p

£17.48£49.9965%MandM Direct Deals
20
Found 1st AprEdited by:"myusernamehasgone234"
Unisex converse trainers reduced to just £12.99 size 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5

2919425.jpg
Also these ladies one’

mandmdirect.com/01/…avy


2919425.jpg

Theses too

mandmdirect.com/01/…ite


2919425.jpg

More styles

2919425.jpg
Community Updates

Groups

20 Comments
Shame no size 6. Voted hot
Ordered. Thank you
Edited by: "honeyblossom_01" 1st Apr
4.5 in the pumps ordered , thanks
HSG113 m ago

@LeahsMintytoutou @summerof76 @maccy1


Thanks Harvey... shame they don't have white ones. I already got black. These in this sale arnt really my style. Thanks anyway
Why does the title have them as women when they are listed under unisex?
Original Poster
londonlad1924 m ago

Why does the title have them as women when they are listed under unisex?


Due to the small size

Could be Youths

All the others were listed as women’s too
Edited by: "myusernamehasgone234" 1st Apr
Great price... heat
londonlad191 h, 20 m ago

Why does the title have them as women when they are listed under unisex?


Well...it's half right I suppose
Blimey! I hate my big feet...damn youuuuuuuu!
Fab thanks
Unisex = For Women or Men with tiny feet.
Original Poster
PressPlay2 m ago

Unisex = For Women or Men with tiny feet.


I put ladies people complain, change to unisex and i’m still getting grief
myusernamehasgone2342 m ago

I put ladies people complain, change to unisex and i’m still getting grief …I put ladies people complain, change to unisex and i’m still getting grief


I wasn't giving you grief I was joking, maybe I should have put tiny todgers instead of feet
Original Poster
PressPlay46 s ago

I wasn't giving you grief I was joking, maybe I should have put tiny …I wasn't giving you grief I was joking, maybe I should have put tiny todgers instead of feet


Original Poster
myusernamehasgone2341 m ago


I had wondered how many guys have size 3 feet hence the orginal ladies title that was moaned at.

I guess these are probably better suited as unisex youths
myusernamehasgone2341 h, 35 m ago

I had wondered how many guys have size 3 feet hence the orginal ladies …I had wondered how many guys have size 3 feet hence the orginal ladies title that was moaned at.I guess these are probably better suited as unisex youths


I didn't moan I asked a question. They were labelled as unisex and you decided to label them as womens because in your opinion only women would have feet that size. Not forgetting the different sizes of men out there or kids/teens that have not fully grown yet. How's that tunnel vision working out for you? Now it's moaning.
Original Poster
londonlad194 h, 19 m ago

I didn't moan I asked a question. They were labelled as unisex and you …I didn't moan I asked a question. They were labelled as unisex and you decided to label them as womens because in your opinion only women would have feet that size. Not forgetting the different sizes of men out there or kids/teens that have not fully grown yet. How's that tunnel vision working out for you? Now it's moaning.


I put women’s as all the others I was looking at were women’s. I hadn’t noticed they were labelled unisex when I was putting the post together. I tagged them in ladies and kids section to cover youths. I opted not tag men’s fashion as blokes would moan the sizes were too small which they even do when larger sizes 6,7 are posted previously.

When you pointed out they were unisex I changed the title. But explained my previous reasoning.

I still believe only a very small percentage of adult male would wear those sizes so still haven’t added to men fashion as it’s not fair to disappoint.

I find your tunnel vision comment very upsetting

plus its 2018 people can wear whatever they want, does it matter how it’s labelled.
Edited by: "myusernamehasgone234" 2nd Apr
Post a comment
Avatar
@
    Text