EXPIRED

Do you find Biffy67's avatar offensive?

Banned
Avatar in next post

28 Comments

Original Poster Banned

hotukdeals.com/forums/customavatars/avatar45632_3.gif" alt="http://www.hotukdeals.com/forums/customavatars/avatar45632_3.gif" />
Biffy67 the image is hosted on hotukdeals.com so I take no liability for any offence caused

Banned

if its a women i dont find it offensive

if a man then YES i find it offensive

oh my god

its a bum

nah its alrite, seen plenty of bums in my time

Banned

well, ive seen members, members with alot of those little red dots under their name, with a bum in a thong, boobs in a skimpy bra, handguns,knives. i find this falls in the same category. if their avatar has not been requested to move, i dont see why he's should.

im not sticking up for no one. im neutral on this. just making a point though.

Original Poster Banned

But it's naked :w00t:

and with these red dots you get concessions on what you can get away with

Offensive, no.

Sad.... That's another question entirely.

Banned

theres a guy who has an avatar with two stick people sha**ing!!

id rather members not have any of the above mentioned ive opsted but hey all biffy can say is if theyve got it so can he!

Original Poster Banned

Shengis;4365498

Offensive, no.Sad.... That's another question entirely.



What you doing awake ? :?

lumoruk;4365502

What you doing awake ? :?



I'm normally awake at this time, just not posting :lol:

Only time I can watch TV in peace :w00t:

Banned

Shengis;4365498

Offensive, no.Sad.... That's another question entirely.



shengis u always make me :giggle:

Brainiac repeats are just so much fun !

All bottoms are offensive at one time or another.

Omg A Bum!!!!

Banned

offensive? its a bum. everyone has one... whats to be offended about?

dear god(no offence to the atheists or those who don't believe in a deity going by the term "god") I think this Biffy character should be named, shamed then publicly flogged at noon on the streets of our great capital Londinium by her majesty the Queen(no offence to the republicans amongst us either).

Down with this sort of thing!!!!

Thats not a bum, this is a bum......

http://www.vyuz.com/images/bumfights.jpg

Craig david;4365490

if its a women i dont find it offensiveif a man then YES i find it … if its a women i dont find it offensiveif a man then YES i find it offensive:)



+1

Loads of users on here have posted pics of bare backsides and in larger size pics as well!!! Personally I dont find it offensive.

What the question should be is, what is HUKDs policy on naked pictures of any sort given that it is generally accepted as a family forum.

But regarding the users avatar then no, I dont find it offensive. :thumbsup:

id this is a family forum..which its meant to be..and u cant use the word CARP on here then i cant see why u can put bums and shagging sticks on here!!

shengis that bum pic was so funny!

not offensive to me tho i'm not easily offended

could be worse someone could have the wee jamjar guy as an avatar . :thumbsup:

http://i40.tinypic.com/35l6h05.jpg

;-) nothing wrong with that bum pic as long as it aint got hairs on or showing!

Personally, it doesn't offend me as long as it doesn't go too far. However, if it leads to an over-sexualised site or one where women are being routinely objectified, then I think it probably does become a problem. You could for example make the argument that StevenA2000_uk's avartar (see above) is more offensive than the bum in this case.

I've seen a couple of sites that ban avatars which include nudity, animated bouncing boobs etc . HUKD is more relaxed about this.

thats a peach of an ass....

Liddle ol' me;4365960

Personally, it doesn't offend me as long as it doesn't go too far. … Personally, it doesn't offend me as long as it doesn't go too far. However, if it leads to an over-sexualised site or one where women are being routinely objectified, then I think it probably does become a problem. You could for example make the argument that StevenA2000_uk's avartar (see above) is more offensive than the bum in this case. I've seen a couple of sites that ban avatars which include nudity, animated bouncing boobs etc . HUKD is more relaxed about this.



nowt wrong with my avi.... it's not rude

Banned

Sexual innuendos from flutterring eye lashes and the potential connection to beastiality shouldn't be allowed either.

guv;4366344

Sexual innuendos from flutterring eye lashes and the potential connection … Sexual innuendos from flutterring eye lashes and the potential connection to beastiality shouldn't be allowed either.



I'll never think of the donkey out of shrek in the same light again lol.............

Banned

I like big butts and i cannot lie....................

Liddle ol' me;4365960

Personally, it doesn't offend me as long as it doesn't go too far. … Personally, it doesn't offend me as long as it doesn't go too far. However, if it leads to an over-sexualised site or one where women are being routinely objectified, then I think it probably does become a problem. You could for example make the argument that StevenA2000_uk's avartar (see above) is more offensive than the bum in this case.



liddle, wtf is this? seriously?
Post a comment
Avatar
@
    Text
    Top Discussions
    1. hOW SHOCKED WERE YOU AT THE GLASGOW FRUIT MARKET CONFLAGRATION??77
    2. Xbox One X - (News, updates, etc)3381
    3. Any PS4 News Here29213601
    4. Now TV CODES - Free Sky Entertainment/Kids/Cinema/Sports812

    See more discussions