### Top Discussions

### Top Discussions

### Popular Groups

PS430034 deals

Xbox One59937 deals

Nintendo Switch2607 deals

TV50741 deals

PC43743 deals

Laptop30454 deals

iPhone27848 deals

Tablet19577 deals

Shoes33247 deals

Camera20531 deals

Headphones13264 deals

Perfume15908 deals

Watch18042 deals

Toys56451 deals

Lego17651 deals

Dyson2290 deals

Washing Machine7236 deals

Sim Only3466 deals

Car Leasing1397 deals

Credit Card1349 deals

That would be 5+4 =9

My bad, added 4 to 7.

Yep.

To Ollie's original question - no, they can't all be prime, as exactly one of {a,a+2,a+4} must be divisible by 3.

To see this, do you understand modular arithmetic?

If a ≡ 0 (mod 3), then it's divisible by 3 and hence not prime.

If a ≡ 1 (mod 3), then (a + 2) ≡ 0 (mod 3) and hence is not prime

If a ≡ 2 (mod 3), then (a + 1) ≡ 0 (mod 3) and hence is not prime

If the above doesn't make sense, let me know.

I'm hopng that we're not just doing your homework for you?

Edited by:"Illusionary" 2nd Apri will leave it there for my stupidity

in my head it went 17 19 23 haha

Edited by:"pinkleponkle" 2nd AprThen a + 4 = 21 = 3 × 7

Edited by:"Illusionary" 2nd AprIf you add 2 it will probably make it divisible by 3 and if not the it will be divisible by 5.

A=7 9 11 9/3

A=11 13 15 15/5

A=9 11 13 9/3

A= 13 15 17 15/3 or 5

All primes can’t be even after 2 and cannot end with 5 or 0.

Divisibility by 5 is a red herring, but considering divisibility by 3 is indeed the way to go. See my post above for a full explanation.

Therefore if A+2 is odd, A, A+2 and A+4 are 3 consecutive odd numbers. Out of 3 consecutive odd numbers one will always be divisible by 3.

Where A>3 it eliminates 1,3,5 and 3,5,7 which are the only 2 exceptions.

Yep - just make sure that you understand how to prove your assertion about three consutive odd numbers.