Groups

    Roman Polanski

    Why does this self confessed paedophile seem to have support from everyone, everywhere. From all the people who have starred in his films and now the French president, it seems if you're rich and famous enough, it doesnt matter if you used to fiddle with kids.

    He should be dragged back to the US and charged.

    30 Comments

    or stoned in the middle east...

    Banned

    or chemically castrated in poland

    he should get a hold of wacko jackos lawyers.

    Banned

    Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown.

    Original Poster

    Id rather he got hold of his pharmacist to be honest

    'it seems if you're rich and famous enough, it doesnt matter if you used to fiddle with kids'

    Example #2 : Michael Jackson

    Banned

    funlovincriminal;6411898

    'it seems if you're rich and famous enough, it doesnt matter if you used … 'it seems if you're rich and famous enough, it doesnt matter if you used to fiddle with kids'Example #2 : Michael Jackson



    Found innocent - move on:whistling:

    FilthAndFurry;6411910

    Found innocent - move on:whistling:


    This is true.

    Original Poster

    Michael Jackson was aquitted due to lack of evidence

    cnn.com/200…tml


    that is a world away from being 'found innocent'

    Jackson touched children...

    Guilty until proven innocent; doesn't apply to Roman though he's already admitted guilt.

    iNSOMANiAC

    He should be dragged back to the US and charged.



    Here's hoping!

    Original Poster

    rossg91;6411939

    Jackson touched children...



    He did not ! Just ask the parents he paid off before the ones thats took him to court

    Banned

    iNSOMANiAC;6411984

    He did not ! Just ask the parents he paid off before the ones thats took … He did not ! Just ask the parents he paid off before the ones thats took him to court



    He didn't pay them off.

    Polanski was unlucky that he was up against The Godfather - Part Two at the 1974 Oscars. Great movie though.

    Original Poster

    http://i.cdn.turner.com/trutv/thesmokinggun.com/graphics/art3/0616042retainer1.gif

    roman polanski, michael jackson and didnt bill wyman admit to it? outside of celebrity lala land the would be called the sick pervs that they are, and saying jacko was innocent is like saying oj simpson was a model husband.:x

    Original Poster

    chezz2;6412021

    roman polanski, michael jackson and didnt bill wyman admit to it? outside … roman polanski, michael jackson and didnt bill wyman admit to it? outside of celebrity lala land the would be called the sick pervs that they are, and saying jacko was innocent is like saying oj simpson was a model husband.:x



    You cant tell some people, they like to argue for the sake of it without knowing any of the facts.

    Banned

    iNSOMANiAC;6412045

    You cant tell some people, they like to argue for the sake of it without … You cant tell some people, they like to argue for the sake of it without knowing any of the facts.



    Please, let's not talk about facts. It won't help you.

    The fact of the Michael Jackson payout is that he didn't want to pay the family - his insurers did so as to avoid the publicity of a case.

    Banned

    chezz2;6412021

    roman polanski, michael jackson and didnt bill wyman admit to it? outside … roman polanski, michael jackson and didnt bill wyman admit to it? outside of celebrity lala land the would be called the sick pervs that they are, and saying jacko was innocent is like saying oj simpson was a model husband.:x



    Saying Michael Jackson (and incidentally OJ) was not guilty is just respecting the rule of law and wanting to avoid making libellous statements.

    You cannot argue with followers of cult figures,There are still people who thought it was okay to let David koresh have sex with their kids,

    iNSOMANiAC;6411984

    He did not ! Just ask the parents he paid off before the ones thats took … He did not ! Just ask the parents he paid off before the ones thats took him to court



    Check your facts before posting utter *****.

    Jackson's Insurance Company was the ones that did the deal, they are the ones that paid off the kid and his family, Jackson refused to do so but was pushed, he wanted to go to court.

    Original Poster

    Wotwot123;6412087

    Check your facts before posting utter *****.Jackson's Insurance Company … Check your facts before posting utter *****.Jackson's Insurance Company was the ones that did the deal, they are the ones that paid off the kid and his family, Jackson refused to do so but was pushed, he wanted to go to court.



    Is this the same bloke that swore he never bleached his skin and had only had one nose job that wanted to go to court ? :-D :roll: , some people lol.

    iNSOMANiAC;6412095

    Is this the same bloke that swore he never bleached his skin and had only … Is this the same bloke that swore he never bleached his skin and had only had one nose job that wanted to go to court ? :-D :roll: , some people lol.



    And his only vice was the odd glass of jesus juice,Honest all the way,,,,,,,

    Banned

    iNSOMANiAC;6412095

    Is this the same bloke that swore he never bleached his skin and had only … Is this the same bloke that swore he never bleached his skin and had only had one nose job that wanted to go to court ? :-D :roll: , some people lol.



    http://intertubes.info/downloads/images/motivation/facepalm.jpg

    perhaps the people who spend so much time considering the letter of the law would like to consider how they would feel facing upto the financial might of one of these celebs if their own child had been abused. to take someone to court and put your child through the wringer is horrendous enough in a british court to have to do it against a celeb is a david and goliath endeavour. most will cave in. to think that money cannot buy their freedom is naive.

    Banned

    chezz2;6412134

    perhaps the people who spend so much time considering the letter of the … perhaps the people who spend so much time considering the letter of the law would like to consider how they would feel facing upto the financial might of one of these celebs if their own child had been abused. to take someone to court and put your child through the wringer is horrendous enough in a british court to have to do it against a celeb is a david and goliath endeavour. most will cave in. to think that money cannot buy their freedom is naive.



    Not sure how much money I would need to be appeased at my child being molested.

    polanski to have 3 weeks holiday in mc donalds...that should make him happy!!!!

    Original Poster

    paying off parents to avoid court 'to avoid adverse publicity' rather than fighting to clear your name is certainly an ..........interesting plan lol, despite the fact is makes you appear more guilty i suppose it does have the positive effect of making law suits disappear.

    iNSOMANiAC;6412390

    paying off parents to avoid court 'to avoid adverse publicity' rather … paying off parents to avoid court 'to avoid adverse publicity' rather than fighting to clear your name is certainly an ..........interesting plan lol, despite the fact is makes you appear more guilty i suppose it does have the positive effect of making law suits disappear.



    id say that about sums it up insomniac

    Banned

    chezz2;6413670

    id say that about sums it up insomniac



    If you look at it very simplistically it does, without factoring in the insurer's concerns.
    Post a comment
    Avatar
    @
      Text
      Top Discussions
      1. How dangerous is Donald trump?31150
      2. What do you feel like whinging about today?1917262
      3. ❅☁☁❅ I want☼to talk☼about the☔WEATHER☔no politics☃no religion❅☁☁❅18846194
      4. Just heard this...2 ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ congrats to all on 392k ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★7764288

      See more discussions